The Effectiveness of Ebselen in Facial Nerve Crush Injury: An Experimental Study.

Lütfü Şeneldir, Veysel Alparslan Gölcük, Gökçe Tanyeri Toker, Ayşegül Verim, Pembegül Güneş
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Ebselen in Facial Nerve Crush Injury: An Experimental Study.","authors":"Lütfü Şeneldir, Veysel Alparslan Gölcük, Gökçe Tanyeri Toker, Ayşegül Verim, Pembegül Güneş","doi":"10.5152/iao.2024.231360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ebselen is a neuroprotective drug that protects cellular components from oxidative damage by modulating enzymatic cofactors, metalloproteins, gene expression, antioxidant-anti-inflammatory effects, and immunological systems. Our goal was to compare the efficacy of Ebselen and methylprednisolone on rat facial nerve crush injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty healthy male Wistar rats (mean weight of 245 g) were used in this study. The rats were randomly divided into four groups: Group 1 (ebselen group), Group 2 (methylprednisolone group), Group 3 (control group), and Group 4 (sham group (the right side of the control group)). Except for the sham group, all groups had their left facial nerve crushed. Three weeks after surgery, prospective functional, histologic, and electrophysiologic recovery was reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ebselen group and methylprednisolone group had similar and more significant recovery at Nerve Excitability Thresholds (NET) at the end of three weeks. These groups also showed similar features in terms of histopathological parameters such as axonal degeneration, vascular congestion, axon diameter, and myelin thickness. Except for the macrovacuolization parameter, both showed statistically better results than the control group. Although there was an earlier improvement in the whiskers and blink tests in the ebselen group compared to the methylprednisolone and control groups, complete recovery was observed in all groups on the 21st day.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ebselen was found to be similarly effective to methylprednisolone in nerve regeneration in a rat model of experimental facial nerve crush. Considering that methylprednisolone has serious systemic side effects, ebselen may be a good alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":94238,"journal":{"name":"The journal of international advanced otology","volume":"20 6","pages":"507-516"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11639602/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of international advanced otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2024.231360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ebselen is a neuroprotective drug that protects cellular components from oxidative damage by modulating enzymatic cofactors, metalloproteins, gene expression, antioxidant-anti-inflammatory effects, and immunological systems. Our goal was to compare the efficacy of Ebselen and methylprednisolone on rat facial nerve crush injury.

Methods: Thirty healthy male Wistar rats (mean weight of 245 g) were used in this study. The rats were randomly divided into four groups: Group 1 (ebselen group), Group 2 (methylprednisolone group), Group 3 (control group), and Group 4 (sham group (the right side of the control group)). Except for the sham group, all groups had their left facial nerve crushed. Three weeks after surgery, prospective functional, histologic, and electrophysiologic recovery was reported.

Results: The ebselen group and methylprednisolone group had similar and more significant recovery at Nerve Excitability Thresholds (NET) at the end of three weeks. These groups also showed similar features in terms of histopathological parameters such as axonal degeneration, vascular congestion, axon diameter, and myelin thickness. Except for the macrovacuolization parameter, both showed statistically better results than the control group. Although there was an earlier improvement in the whiskers and blink tests in the ebselen group compared to the methylprednisolone and control groups, complete recovery was observed in all groups on the 21st day.

Conclusion: Ebselen was found to be similarly effective to methylprednisolone in nerve regeneration in a rat model of experimental facial nerve crush. Considering that methylprednisolone has serious systemic side effects, ebselen may be a good alternative.

艾布利恩治疗面神经挤压损伤疗效的实验研究。
背景:艾布selen是一种神经保护药物,通过调节酶辅助因子、金属蛋白、基因表达、抗氧化-抗炎作用和免疫系统,保护细胞成分免受氧化损伤。我们的目的是比较艾布伦和甲基强的松龙对大鼠面神经挤压损伤的疗效。方法:选用健康雄性Wistar大鼠30只,平均体重245 g。将大鼠随机分为4组:1组(依布selen组)、2组(甲基强的松龙组)、3组(对照组)、4组(假手术组(对照组右侧)。除假手术组外,其余各组均有左侧面神经损伤。术后三周,预期功能、组织学和电生理恢复。结果:艾布林组与甲基强的松龙组在3周后神经兴奋阈值(NET)恢复相似且更显著。这些组在轴突变性、血管充血、轴突直径和髓鞘厚度等组织病理学参数方面也表现出相似的特征。除大空泡化参数外,两组结果均优于对照组。虽然与甲基强的松龙和对照组相比,艾布selen组的胡须和眨眼测试有较早的改善,但在第21天,所有组均完全恢复。结论:在实验性面神经损伤大鼠模型中,艾布selen与甲基强的松龙具有相似的神经再生效果。考虑到甲基强的松龙有严重的全身副作用,依布林可能是一个很好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信