Stefano Martinetti, Peter Molnar, Andrea Carminati, Marius G Floriancic
{"title":"Contrasting the soil-plant hydraulics of beech and spruce by linking root water uptake to transpiration dynamics.","authors":"Stefano Martinetti, Peter Molnar, Andrea Carminati, Marius G Floriancic","doi":"10.1093/treephys/tpae158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tree water status is mainly determined by the amount of water taken up from roots and lost through leaves by transpiration. Variations in transpiration and stomatal conductance are often related to atmospheric conditions and leaf water potential. Yet, few experimental datasets exist that enable to relate leaf water potential, transpiration dynamics and temporal variation of root water uptake from different depths during soil drying. Here we explored the soil-plant hydraulic system using field measurements of water potentials and fluxes in soils, roots, stems and leaves of beech (Fagus sylvatica) and spruce (Picea abies) trees. Spruce maintained less negative water potentials than beech during soil drying, reflecting a more stringent stomatal control. While root water uptake depths were similar between species, water potentials in plant tissues of spruce were rather constant and less correlated across roots and the stem, possibly because of large water storage and hydraulic capacitance in these tissues. Root water uptake from deep soil layers increased during dry periods, particularly for beech. Our data suggest that species-specific root hydraulic conductance, capacitance and water uptake strategy are linked and affect transpiration dynamics. Thus, it is important to include such species-specific hydraulics when predicting transpiration rates based on plant water status.</p>","PeriodicalId":23286,"journal":{"name":"Tree physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11761973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tree physiology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpae158","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Tree water status is mainly determined by the amount of water taken up from roots and lost through leaves by transpiration. Variations in transpiration and stomatal conductance are often related to atmospheric conditions and leaf water potential. Yet, few experimental datasets exist that enable to relate leaf water potential, transpiration dynamics and temporal variation of root water uptake from different depths during soil drying. Here we explored the soil-plant hydraulic system using field measurements of water potentials and fluxes in soils, roots, stems and leaves of beech (Fagus sylvatica) and spruce (Picea abies) trees. Spruce maintained less negative water potentials than beech during soil drying, reflecting a more stringent stomatal control. While root water uptake depths were similar between species, water potentials in plant tissues of spruce were rather constant and less correlated across roots and the stem, possibly because of large water storage and hydraulic capacitance in these tissues. Root water uptake from deep soil layers increased during dry periods, particularly for beech. Our data suggest that species-specific root hydraulic conductance, capacitance and water uptake strategy are linked and affect transpiration dynamics. Thus, it is important to include such species-specific hydraulics when predicting transpiration rates based on plant water status.
期刊介绍:
Tree Physiology promotes research in a framework of hierarchically organized systems, measuring insight by the ability to link adjacent layers: thus, investigated tree physiology phenomenon should seek mechanistic explanation in finer-scale phenomena as well as seek significance in larger scale phenomena (Passioura 1979). A phenomenon not linked downscale is merely descriptive; an observation not linked upscale, might be trivial. Physiologists often refer qualitatively to processes at finer or coarser scale than the scale of their observation, and studies formally directed at three, or even two adjacent scales are rare. To emphasize the importance of relating mechanisms to coarser scale function, Tree Physiology will highlight papers doing so particularly well as feature papers.