Elhanan Lehmann , Stephanie A. Pumphrey , Jane C. Lindsey , Lois A. Wetmore
{"title":"The effect of intravenous hydromorphone alone or in combination with midazolam or dexmedetomidine on intraocular pressure in dogs","authors":"Elhanan Lehmann , Stephanie A. Pumphrey , Jane C. Lindsey , Lois A. Wetmore","doi":"10.1016/j.vaa.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the effect of intravenous (IV) hydromorphone alone or in combination with midazolam or dexmedetomidine on intraocular pressure (IOP) in dogs.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Prospective, randomized, blinded, crossover study.</div></div><div><h3>Animals</h3><div>A group of seven healthy, ophthalmologically normal, adult Beagle dogs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of four IV drug combinations were evaluated: hydromorphone 0.1 mg kg<sup>–1</sup> (H); hydromorphone 0.1 mg kg<sup>–1</sup> and dexmedetomidine 0.001 mg kg<sup>–1</sup> (HD); hydromorphone 0.1 mg kg<sup>–1</sup> and midazolam 0.2 mg kg<sup>–1</sup> (HM2); and hydromorphone 0.1 mg kg<sup>–1</sup> and midazolam 0.4 mg kg<sup>–1</sup> (HM4). Treatment order was randomized, with a 2 week washout period between treatments. IOP and sedation scores were obtained before (T0) and 3, 30, 60, 240 and 480 minutes after drug injection. To account for repeated measurements for each dog across treatments and time points, mixed models were used to compare IOP at T0 by eye and to describe changes from T0 in IOP (averaged across eyes) and sedation scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In treatment H, IOP increased significantly from baseline levels [predicted mean increase of 5.5 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.7–7.3] at T3 (<em>p</em> < 0.001) and 2.7 mmHg (95% CI: 0.9–4.5) at T30 (<em>p</em> = 0.005)]. In treatment HD, mean IOP increased from baseline by 2.3 mmHg (95% CI: 0.5–4.1) at T30 (<em>p</em> = 0.014). In treatment HM2, mean IOP increased by 2.5 mmHg (95% CI: 0.2–4.9) at T30 (<em>p</em> = 0.035). In treatment HM4, IOP did not change significantly from baseline at any time point. Sedation scores over time did not differ significantly between treatments.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical relevance</h3><div>Injection of IV hydromorphone alone (0.1 mg kg<sup>–1</sup>) caused a transient increase in IOP and might not be appropriate if an acute increase in IOP is undesirable. Addition of dexmedetomidine or midazolam to hydromorphone, at the doses studied, appears to attenuate this increase in IOP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23626,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia","volume":"52 1","pages":"Pages 53-60"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467298724003386","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the effect of intravenous (IV) hydromorphone alone or in combination with midazolam or dexmedetomidine on intraocular pressure (IOP) in dogs.
A group of seven healthy, ophthalmologically normal, adult Beagle dogs.
Methods
A total of four IV drug combinations were evaluated: hydromorphone 0.1 mg kg–1 (H); hydromorphone 0.1 mg kg–1 and dexmedetomidine 0.001 mg kg–1 (HD); hydromorphone 0.1 mg kg–1 and midazolam 0.2 mg kg–1 (HM2); and hydromorphone 0.1 mg kg–1 and midazolam 0.4 mg kg–1 (HM4). Treatment order was randomized, with a 2 week washout period between treatments. IOP and sedation scores were obtained before (T0) and 3, 30, 60, 240 and 480 minutes after drug injection. To account for repeated measurements for each dog across treatments and time points, mixed models were used to compare IOP at T0 by eye and to describe changes from T0 in IOP (averaged across eyes) and sedation scores.
Results
In treatment H, IOP increased significantly from baseline levels [predicted mean increase of 5.5 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.7–7.3] at T3 (p < 0.001) and 2.7 mmHg (95% CI: 0.9–4.5) at T30 (p = 0.005)]. In treatment HD, mean IOP increased from baseline by 2.3 mmHg (95% CI: 0.5–4.1) at T30 (p = 0.014). In treatment HM2, mean IOP increased by 2.5 mmHg (95% CI: 0.2–4.9) at T30 (p = 0.035). In treatment HM4, IOP did not change significantly from baseline at any time point. Sedation scores over time did not differ significantly between treatments.
Conclusions and clinical relevance
Injection of IV hydromorphone alone (0.1 mg kg–1) caused a transient increase in IOP and might not be appropriate if an acute increase in IOP is undesirable. Addition of dexmedetomidine or midazolam to hydromorphone, at the doses studied, appears to attenuate this increase in IOP.
期刊介绍:
Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia is the official journal of the Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists, the American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia and the European College of Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. Its purpose is the publication of original, peer reviewed articles covering all branches of anaesthesia and the relief of pain in animals. Articles concerned with the following subjects related to anaesthesia and analgesia are also welcome:
the basic sciences;
pathophysiology of disease as it relates to anaesthetic management
equipment
intensive care
chemical restraint of animals including laboratory animals, wildlife and exotic animals
welfare issues associated with pain and distress
education in veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia.
Review articles, special articles, and historical notes will also be published, along with editorials, case reports in the form of letters to the editor, and book reviews. There is also an active correspondence section.