Cryo-EM reconstruction of helical polymers: Beyond the simple cases.

IF 7.2 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOPHYSICS
Mark A B Kreutzberger, Ravi R Sonani, Edward H Egelman
{"title":"Cryo-EM reconstruction of helical polymers: Beyond the simple cases.","authors":"Mark A B Kreutzberger, Ravi R Sonani, Edward H Egelman","doi":"10.1017/S0033583524000155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Helices are one of the most frequently encountered symmetries in biological assemblies. Helical symmetry has been exploited in electron microscopic studies as a limited number of filament images, in principle, can provide all the information needed to do a three-dimensional reconstruction of a polymer. Over the past 25 years, three-dimensional reconstructions of helical polymers from cryo-EM images have shifted completely from Fourier-Bessel methods to single-particle approaches. The single-particle approaches have allowed people to surmount the problem that very few biological polymers are crystalline in order, and despite the flexibility and heterogeneity present in most of these polymers, reaching a resolution where accurate atomic models can be built has now become the standard. While determining the correct helical symmetry may be very simple for something like F-actin, for many other polymers, particularly those formed from small peptides, it can be much more challenging. This review discusses why symmetry determination can be problematic, and why trial-and-error methods are still the best approach. Studies of many macromolecular assemblies, such as icosahedral capsids, have usually found that not imposing symmetry leads to a great reduction in resolution while at the same time revealing possibly interesting asymmetric features. We show that for certain helical assemblies asymmetric reconstructions can sometimes lead to greatly improved resolution. Further, in the case of supercoiled flagellar filaments from bacteria and archaea, we show that the imposition of helical symmetry can not only be wrong, but is not necessary, and obscures the mechanisms whereby these filaments supercoil.</p>","PeriodicalId":20828,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics","volume":"57 ","pages":"e16"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033583524000155","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Helices are one of the most frequently encountered symmetries in biological assemblies. Helical symmetry has been exploited in electron microscopic studies as a limited number of filament images, in principle, can provide all the information needed to do a three-dimensional reconstruction of a polymer. Over the past 25 years, three-dimensional reconstructions of helical polymers from cryo-EM images have shifted completely from Fourier-Bessel methods to single-particle approaches. The single-particle approaches have allowed people to surmount the problem that very few biological polymers are crystalline in order, and despite the flexibility and heterogeneity present in most of these polymers, reaching a resolution where accurate atomic models can be built has now become the standard. While determining the correct helical symmetry may be very simple for something like F-actin, for many other polymers, particularly those formed from small peptides, it can be much more challenging. This review discusses why symmetry determination can be problematic, and why trial-and-error methods are still the best approach. Studies of many macromolecular assemblies, such as icosahedral capsids, have usually found that not imposing symmetry leads to a great reduction in resolution while at the same time revealing possibly interesting asymmetric features. We show that for certain helical assemblies asymmetric reconstructions can sometimes lead to greatly improved resolution. Further, in the case of supercoiled flagellar filaments from bacteria and archaea, we show that the imposition of helical symmetry can not only be wrong, but is not necessary, and obscures the mechanisms whereby these filaments supercoil.

螺旋聚合物的低温电镜重建:超越简单的情况。
螺旋结构是生物结构中最常见的对称结构之一。螺旋对称已经在电子显微镜研究中被利用,因为有限数量的细丝图像,原则上可以提供做聚合物三维重建所需的所有信息。在过去的25年里,从低温电镜图像中重建螺旋聚合物的三维结构已经完全从傅里叶-贝塞尔方法转变为单粒子方法。单粒子方法使人们克服了很少有生物聚合物是有序结晶的问题,尽管大多数这些聚合物具有灵活性和非均质性,但达到精确原子模型的分辨率现在已成为标准。虽然对于像f -肌动蛋白这样的东西来说,确定正确的螺旋对称可能非常简单,但对于许多其他聚合物,特别是那些由小肽形成的聚合物,它可能更具挑战性。这篇综述讨论了为什么对称的确定是有问题的,以及为什么试错法仍然是最好的方法。对许多大分子组件的研究,如二十面体衣壳,通常发现不强加对称会导致分辨率大大降低,同时揭示可能有趣的不对称特征。我们表明,对于某些螺旋装配,不对称重建有时可以大大提高分辨率。此外,在细菌和古细菌的超螺旋鞭毛细丝的情况下,我们表明螺旋对称的强加不仅可能是错误的,而且不是必要的,并且模糊了这些细丝超螺旋的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics
Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics 生物-生物物理
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
1.60%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics covers the field of experimental and computational biophysics. Experimental biophysics span across different physics-based measurements such as optical microscopy, super-resolution imaging, electron microscopy, X-ray and neutron diffraction, spectroscopy, calorimetry, thermodynamics and their integrated uses. Computational biophysics includes theory, simulations, bioinformatics and system analysis. These biophysical methodologies are used to discover the structure, function and physiology of biological systems in varying complexities from cells, organelles, membranes, protein-nucleic acid complexes, molecular machines to molecules. The majority of reviews published are invited from authors who have made significant contributions to the field, who give critical, readable and sometimes controversial accounts of recent progress and problems in their specialty. The journal has long-standing, worldwide reputation, demonstrated by its high ranking in the ISI Science Citation Index, as a forum for general and specialized communication between biophysicists working in different areas. Thematic issues are occasionally published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信