Evaluation of Currently Available Laboratory Methods to Detect Terbinafine Resistant Dermatophytes Including a Gradient Strip for Terbinafine, EUCAST Microdilution E.Def 11.0, a Commercial Real-Time PCR Assay, Squalene Epoxidase Sequencing and Whole Genome Sequencing.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Mycoses Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1111/myc.70005
Rosalie Sacheli, Sabrina Egrek, Khalid El Moussaoui, Rajae Darfouf, Akole Bahun Adjetey, Marie-Pierre Hayette
{"title":"Evaluation of Currently Available Laboratory Methods to Detect Terbinafine Resistant Dermatophytes Including a Gradient Strip for Terbinafine, EUCAST Microdilution E.Def 11.0, a Commercial Real-Time PCR Assay, Squalene Epoxidase Sequencing and Whole Genome Sequencing.","authors":"Rosalie Sacheli, Sabrina Egrek, Khalid El Moussaoui, Rajae Darfouf, Akole Bahun Adjetey, Marie-Pierre Hayette","doi":"10.1111/myc.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Terbinafine resistance in dermatophytes is an increasing problem worldwide. Several outbreaks of terbinafine-resistant dermatophytosis are currently occurring in India and surrounding countries, and these recent years, European countries have also been affected by this issue. Currently, antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes is not routinely performed in clinical laboratories.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Given the current situation and associated public health concerns, there is an urgent need for accurate and rapid detection of terbinafine resistance in laboratories. Therefore, we evaluated different methods currently available for the detection of terbinafine resistance in dermatophytes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-eight strains previously identified as T. indotineae/mentagrophytes/interdigitale were concurrently characterised using terbinafine gradient strips (HiMedia), EUCAST E.Def 11.0 microdilution, the DermaGenius resistance PCR assay (PathoNostics), and SQLE sequencing. These four methods were compared to terbinafine resistance characterisation obtained by whole genome sequencing (WGS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All four evaluated methods were able to detect terbinafine resistant strains either by showing high MICs (> 0.125 μg/mL) or by detecting SQLE substitutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The gradient strips, despite questionable essential agreement with EUCAST E.Def 11.0, can be an easy, fast and cheap method to screen terbinafine resistance among dermatophytes in clinical laboratories. The DermaGenius resistance PCR assay enables rapid detection of the most common substitutions in SQLE associated with terbinafine resistance. However, its inability to precisely determine specific substitutions on SQLE or identify new ones may pose a problem in the future. These limitations can be addressed by using SQLE sequencing or whole genome sequencing (WGS).</p>","PeriodicalId":18797,"journal":{"name":"Mycoses","volume":"67 12","pages":"e70005"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mycoses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.70005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Terbinafine resistance in dermatophytes is an increasing problem worldwide. Several outbreaks of terbinafine-resistant dermatophytosis are currently occurring in India and surrounding countries, and these recent years, European countries have also been affected by this issue. Currently, antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes is not routinely performed in clinical laboratories.

Objectives: Given the current situation and associated public health concerns, there is an urgent need for accurate and rapid detection of terbinafine resistance in laboratories. Therefore, we evaluated different methods currently available for the detection of terbinafine resistance in dermatophytes.

Methods: Twenty-eight strains previously identified as T. indotineae/mentagrophytes/interdigitale were concurrently characterised using terbinafine gradient strips (HiMedia), EUCAST E.Def 11.0 microdilution, the DermaGenius resistance PCR assay (PathoNostics), and SQLE sequencing. These four methods were compared to terbinafine resistance characterisation obtained by whole genome sequencing (WGS).

Results: All four evaluated methods were able to detect terbinafine resistant strains either by showing high MICs (> 0.125 μg/mL) or by detecting SQLE substitutions.

Conclusions: The gradient strips, despite questionable essential agreement with EUCAST E.Def 11.0, can be an easy, fast and cheap method to screen terbinafine resistance among dermatophytes in clinical laboratories. The DermaGenius resistance PCR assay enables rapid detection of the most common substitutions in SQLE associated with terbinafine resistance. However, its inability to precisely determine specific substitutions on SQLE or identify new ones may pose a problem in the future. These limitations can be addressed by using SQLE sequencing or whole genome sequencing (WGS).

评估目前可用的实验室检测特比萘芬耐药皮肤真菌的方法,包括特比萘芬梯度条带法、EUCAST微稀释E.Def 11.0、商业实时荧光定量PCR法、角鲨烯环氧化酶测序和全基因组测序。
背景:特比萘芬耐药是世界范围内日益严重的问题。目前在印度和周边国家发生了几次特比萘芬耐药皮肤真菌病暴发,近年来,欧洲国家也受到这一问题的影响。目前,临床实验室并未常规进行皮肤癣菌的抗真菌药敏试验。目标:鉴于目前的情况和相关的公共卫生问题,迫切需要在实验室中准确和快速地检测特比萘芬耐药性。因此,我们评估了目前可用于检测皮肤真菌特比萘芬耐药性的不同方法。方法:采用特比纳芬梯度条带(HiMedia)、EUCAST e.f def 11.0微量稀释、DermaGenius耐药PCR检测(PathoNostics)和SQLE测序,同时对28株先前鉴定为T. indotineae/mentagrophytes/interdigitale的菌株进行鉴定。将这四种方法与全基因组测序(WGS)获得的特比萘芬耐药性特征进行比较。结果:4种评价方法均能检测出高mic (0.125 μg/mL)或SQLE替代的特比萘芬耐药菌株。结论:尽管与EUCAST E.Def 11.0的基本一致性存在问题,但梯度试条可作为一种简便、快速、廉价的临床实验室皮肤真菌特比萘芬耐药筛查方法。DermaGenius耐药PCR检测能够快速检测与特比萘芬耐药相关的SQLE中最常见的替换。但是,它无法精确地确定SQLE上的特定替换或识别新的替换,这可能会在将来造成问题。这些限制可以通过使用SQLE测序或全基因组测序(WGS)来解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mycoses
Mycoses 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
8.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Mycoses provides an international forum for original papers in English on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapy, prophylaxis, and epidemiology of fungal infectious diseases in humans as well as on the biology of pathogenic fungi. Medical mycology as part of medical microbiology is advancing rapidly. Effective therapeutic strategies are already available in chemotherapy and are being further developed. Their application requires reliable laboratory diagnostic techniques, which, in turn, result from mycological basic research. Opportunistic mycoses vary greatly in their clinical and pathological symptoms, because the underlying disease of a patient at risk decisively determines their symptomatology and progress. The journal Mycoses is therefore of interest to scientists in fundamental mycological research, mycological laboratory diagnosticians and clinicians interested in fungal infections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信