Solid Lipid Nanoparticles and Nanostructured Lipid Particles: A Comparative Review on Lipid-Based Nanocarriers.

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Anjali Sharma, Devkant Sharma, Pritish Kumar Panda, Niladry Shekhar Ghosh
{"title":"Solid Lipid Nanoparticles and Nanostructured Lipid Particles: A Comparative Review on Lipid-Based Nanocarriers.","authors":"Anjali Sharma, Devkant Sharma, Pritish Kumar Panda, Niladry Shekhar Ghosh","doi":"10.2174/0122117385318686241003103005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lipid-based nanocarriers have emerged as promising vehicles for the delivery of various therapeutic agents, owing to their biocompatibility, stability, and ability to encapsulate both hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs. Among these lipid-based nanocarriers, Solid Lipid Nanoparticles (SLNs) and Nanostructured Lipid Carriers (NLCs) have gained significant attention in the field of drug delivery. This comparative review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of SLNs and NLCs, focusing on their formulation, physicochemical properties, drug-loading capacity, stability, and drug release profiles. The review highlights the differences in preparation techniques, particle size, zeta potential, drug encapsulation efficiency, stability, drug delivery, cosmetic and personal care, and food industry applications between SLN and NLC. Furthermore, the review discusses the toxicity and safety profiles of these nanoparticles, including cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, acute toxicity, and long-term toxicity. Finally, the review identifies the potential applications, limitations, and future research directions of SLN and NLC.In summary, this comparative review provides valuable insights into the formulation, physicochemical properties, drug-loading capacity, stability, and drug release profiles of SLNs and NLCs. By understanding the similarities and differences between these lipid-based nanocarriers, researchers and pharmaceutical scientists can make informed decisions regarding the selection of the most suitable nanocarrier for specific therapeutic applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":19774,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical nanotechnology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical nanotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0122117385318686241003103005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lipid-based nanocarriers have emerged as promising vehicles for the delivery of various therapeutic agents, owing to their biocompatibility, stability, and ability to encapsulate both hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs. Among these lipid-based nanocarriers, Solid Lipid Nanoparticles (SLNs) and Nanostructured Lipid Carriers (NLCs) have gained significant attention in the field of drug delivery. This comparative review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of SLNs and NLCs, focusing on their formulation, physicochemical properties, drug-loading capacity, stability, and drug release profiles. The review highlights the differences in preparation techniques, particle size, zeta potential, drug encapsulation efficiency, stability, drug delivery, cosmetic and personal care, and food industry applications between SLN and NLC. Furthermore, the review discusses the toxicity and safety profiles of these nanoparticles, including cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, acute toxicity, and long-term toxicity. Finally, the review identifies the potential applications, limitations, and future research directions of SLN and NLC.In summary, this comparative review provides valuable insights into the formulation, physicochemical properties, drug-loading capacity, stability, and drug release profiles of SLNs and NLCs. By understanding the similarities and differences between these lipid-based nanocarriers, researchers and pharmaceutical scientists can make informed decisions regarding the selection of the most suitable nanocarrier for specific therapeutic applications.

固体脂质纳米颗粒和纳米结构脂质颗粒:脂基纳米载体的比较研究。
基于脂质的纳米载体由于其生物相容性、稳定性和封装亲水性和疏水性药物的能力,已成为各种治疗药物递送的有前途的载体。在这些以脂质为基础的纳米载体中,固体脂质纳米颗粒(SLNs)和纳米结构脂质载体(NLCs)在给药领域受到了广泛的关注。本文旨在对sln和NLCs的配方、理化性质、载药量、稳定性和药物释放特性等方面进行比较分析。综述了SLN和NLC在制备技术、粒径、zeta电位、药物包封效率、稳定性、给药、化妆品和个人护理以及食品工业应用等方面的差异。此外,本文还讨论了这些纳米颗粒的毒性和安全性,包括细胞毒性、遗传毒性、急性毒性和长期毒性。最后,对SLN和NLC的潜在应用、局限性和未来的研究方向进行了展望。总之,这一比较综述为sln和NLCs的配方、理化性质、载药量、稳定性和药物释放谱提供了有价值的见解。通过了解这些基于脂质的纳米载体之间的异同,研究人员和制药科学家可以在选择最适合特定治疗应用的纳米载体方面做出明智的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical nanotechnology
Pharmaceutical nanotechnology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology publishes original manuscripts, full-length/mini reviews, thematic issues, rapid technical notes and commentaries that provide insights into the synthesis, characterisation and pharmaceutical (or diagnostic) application of materials at the nanoscale. The nanoscale is defined as a size range of below 1 µm. Scientific findings related to micro and macro systems with functionality residing within features defined at the nanoscale are also within the scope of the journal. Manuscripts detailing the synthesis, exhaustive characterisation, biological evaluation, clinical testing and/ or toxicological assessment of nanomaterials are of particular interest to the journal’s readership. Articles should be self contained, centred around a well founded hypothesis and should aim to showcase the pharmaceutical/ diagnostic implications of the nanotechnology approach. Manuscripts should aim, wherever possible, to demonstrate the in vivo impact of any nanotechnological intervention. As reducing a material to the nanoscale is capable of fundamentally altering the material’s properties, the journal’s readership is particularly interested in new characterisation techniques and the advanced properties that originate from this size reduction. Both bottom up and top down approaches to the realisation of nanomaterials lie within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信