Nurses' Perceptions of Their Professional Autonomy in Nonpharmacologic Pain Management: A Qualitative Study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Gözde Özaras Öz, Müjgan Onarici
{"title":"Nurses' Perceptions of Their Professional Autonomy in Nonpharmacologic Pain Management: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Gözde Özaras Öz, Müjgan Onarici","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim was to examine nurses' experiences and opinions regarding using their professional autonomy in nonpharmacologic pain management.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative descriptive approach was used in the study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted in the acute care services of a public hospital between December 10, 2022, and March 2023. It was completed with 29 nurses using the purposive sampling method. Data were collected using an ``Interview Guide'' consisting of semi-structured open-ended questions and analyzed using the content analysis method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four main categories emerged. (1) Individual qualities behind independent actions, (2) physician influence in professional autonomy, (3) establishing a positive therapeutic relationship in professional autonomy, and (4) recognizing barriers to professional autonomy. Nurses perceive that they enhance their professional autonomy in nonpharmacologic pain management by making independent decisions and selecting the nonpharmacologic intervention that will optimally benefit the patient. This is achieved by making the most beneficial nonpharmacologic application for the patient, having professional competencies, and realizing physician-nurse collaboration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nurses can improve their professional autonomy in nonpharmacologic pain management by gaining knowledge, skills, expertise, and leadership skills, participating in joint decision-making processes with physicians, and considering patient preferences and needs. Discussions regarding complete professional autonomy among nurses were limited by the patients' conditions, physicians' opinions, and management's decisions. Nurse managers can use their experience to offer additional details on care, protocols and practices.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Nurse managers can support nurses in their units and use their expertise to develop care, practices, and processes. At the organizational level, they can create a working environment in which nurses can better participate in multiprofessional working groups. Supportive management can have a significant positive impact on nurses' professional autonomy. It creates a work culture in the organization where there is an opportunity for shared decision-making and development of daily work without hierarchy and where employees feel trusted and valued.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim was to examine nurses' experiences and opinions regarding using their professional autonomy in nonpharmacologic pain management.

Design: A qualitative descriptive approach was used in the study.

Methods: The study was conducted in the acute care services of a public hospital between December 10, 2022, and March 2023. It was completed with 29 nurses using the purposive sampling method. Data were collected using an ``Interview Guide'' consisting of semi-structured open-ended questions and analyzed using the content analysis method.

Results: Four main categories emerged. (1) Individual qualities behind independent actions, (2) physician influence in professional autonomy, (3) establishing a positive therapeutic relationship in professional autonomy, and (4) recognizing barriers to professional autonomy. Nurses perceive that they enhance their professional autonomy in nonpharmacologic pain management by making independent decisions and selecting the nonpharmacologic intervention that will optimally benefit the patient. This is achieved by making the most beneficial nonpharmacologic application for the patient, having professional competencies, and realizing physician-nurse collaboration.

Conclusions: Nurses can improve their professional autonomy in nonpharmacologic pain management by gaining knowledge, skills, expertise, and leadership skills, participating in joint decision-making processes with physicians, and considering patient preferences and needs. Discussions regarding complete professional autonomy among nurses were limited by the patients' conditions, physicians' opinions, and management's decisions. Nurse managers can use their experience to offer additional details on care, protocols and practices.

Clinical implications: Nurse managers can support nurses in their units and use their expertise to develop care, practices, and processes. At the organizational level, they can create a working environment in which nurses can better participate in multiprofessional working groups. Supportive management can have a significant positive impact on nurses' professional autonomy. It creates a work culture in the organization where there is an opportunity for shared decision-making and development of daily work without hierarchy and where employees feel trusted and valued.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信