Children Centered Care: child and parent perspectives on a multi-faceted concept for magnetic resonance imaging without anesthesia - a survey.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1007/s00247-024-06111-3
Stine Bjerrum Runge, Helle Precht, Ib Erik Jensen, Kim Jensen, Tine Abildgaard Johannesen, Malene Roland Vils Pedersen, Nicolaj Lyhne Christensen
{"title":"Children Centered Care: child and parent perspectives on a multi-faceted concept for magnetic resonance imaging without anesthesia - a survey.","authors":"Stine Bjerrum Runge, Helle Precht, Ib Erik Jensen, Kim Jensen, Tine Abildgaard Johannesen, Malene Roland Vils Pedersen, Nicolaj Lyhne Christensen","doi":"10.1007/s00247-024-06111-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anxiety-provoking healthcare procedures require specific child-friendly approaches. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can cause anxiety for children and general anesthesia (GA) is often used. We developed and tested a multi-faceted child-friendly concept, Children Centered Care, for MRI of children without GA.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate children's and parents' individual experiences with the concept using a survey. The main aim was to evaluate comfort for children and sense of security for parents during unsedated MRI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective study of 265 children aged 4-10 years enrolled in 2016 and 2017, the Children Centered Care concept is compared to a standard setup. The concept included an interactive app, trained pediatric radiographers, a children's lounge with a toy-scanner, and a child-friendly multimedia environment in the scanner room. A 25-item survey was used including a mix of open and closed questions, free text, and a visual analogue scale to evaluate self-reported child comfort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 154 children were included in the Children Centered Care group and 111 in the standard group. Overall, the mean age was 8.5 years (range 4.0-10.9 years). With Children Centered Care, child comfort increased (88% vs. 77%), P = 0.02. The app and toy-scanner were popular among children. More parents felt \"very much\" prepared (80% vs. 57%), P < 0.01, and \"very much\" secure (92% vs. 79%), P < 0.01.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With the use of a multi-faceted, child-friendly concept, MRI without GA is a feasible first choice for children aged 4-10 years, with high levels of comfort for children and parents.</p>","PeriodicalId":19755,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"334-346"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-024-06111-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anxiety-provoking healthcare procedures require specific child-friendly approaches. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can cause anxiety for children and general anesthesia (GA) is often used. We developed and tested a multi-faceted child-friendly concept, Children Centered Care, for MRI of children without GA.

Objective: To investigate children's and parents' individual experiences with the concept using a survey. The main aim was to evaluate comfort for children and sense of security for parents during unsedated MRI.

Materials and methods: In this prospective study of 265 children aged 4-10 years enrolled in 2016 and 2017, the Children Centered Care concept is compared to a standard setup. The concept included an interactive app, trained pediatric radiographers, a children's lounge with a toy-scanner, and a child-friendly multimedia environment in the scanner room. A 25-item survey was used including a mix of open and closed questions, free text, and a visual analogue scale to evaluate self-reported child comfort.

Results: A total of 154 children were included in the Children Centered Care group and 111 in the standard group. Overall, the mean age was 8.5 years (range 4.0-10.9 years). With Children Centered Care, child comfort increased (88% vs. 77%), P = 0.02. The app and toy-scanner were popular among children. More parents felt "very much" prepared (80% vs. 57%), P < 0.01, and "very much" secure (92% vs. 79%), P < 0.01.

Conclusion: With the use of a multi-faceted, child-friendly concept, MRI without GA is a feasible first choice for children aged 4-10 years, with high levels of comfort for children and parents.

儿童为中心的护理:儿童和家长的观点在一个多方面的概念磁共振成像无麻醉-一项调查。
背景:引起焦虑的保健程序需要具体的儿童友好的方法。核磁共振成像(MRI)可引起儿童焦虑,通常使用全身麻醉(GA)。我们开发并测试了一个多方面的儿童友好概念,以儿童为中心的护理,用于无GA儿童的MRI。目的:采用问卷调查的方法,了解儿童和家长对“幼儿教育”概念的个人体验。主要目的是评估在非镇静MRI期间儿童的舒适度和家长的安全感。材料与方法:对2016年和2017年入组的265名4-10岁儿童进行前瞻性研究,将以儿童为中心的护理理念与标准设置进行比较。这个概念包括一个互动应用程序,训练有素的儿科放射技师,一个带玩具扫描仪的儿童休息室,以及扫描室内的儿童友好多媒体环境。使用了一项25项调查,包括开放式和封闭式问题,免费文本和视觉模拟量表来评估自我报告的儿童舒适度。结果:以儿童为中心护理组154例,标准组111例。总体而言,平均年龄为8.5岁(范围4.0-10.9岁)。采用以儿童为中心的护理,儿童舒适度提高(88%比77%),P = 0.02。该应用程序和玩具扫描仪在儿童中很受欢迎。结论:采用多面性、儿童友好的概念,不加GA的MRI是4-10岁儿童可行的首选,对儿童和家长都有很高的舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Radiology
Pediatric Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
300
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Asian and Oceanic Society for Pediatric Radiology Pediatric Radiology informs its readers of new findings and progress in all areas of pediatric imaging and in related fields. This is achieved by a blend of original papers, complemented by reviews that set out the present state of knowledge in a particular area of the specialty or summarize specific topics in which discussion has led to clear conclusions. Advances in technology, methodology, apparatus and auxiliary equipment are presented, and modifications of standard techniques are described. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信