Sara J. Ochoa , Gregg A. Hanzlicek , Kamilyah R. Miller , Justin Kastner , Jeba R.J. Jesudoss Chelladurai
{"title":"Survey on canine hookworms: Knowledge, perceptions and practices among U.S. veterinarians","authors":"Sara J. Ochoa , Gregg A. Hanzlicek , Kamilyah R. Miller , Justin Kastner , Jeba R.J. Jesudoss Chelladurai","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Canine hookworms (<em>Ancylostoma caninum</em>) are highly prevalent in pet dogs in the United States of America (U.S.). They pose a significant health risk to infected dogs and are also a potential risk to humans as zoonotic agents. Veterinarians play a crucial role in managing this threat through the diagnosis and treatment of infections in pet dogs. However, the rising incidence of anthelmintic resistance in U.S. hookworm populations necessitates increased awareness among veterinarians. To determine U.S. veterinarian's knowledge, perceptions and practices about canine hookworms, a cross-sectional online survey was administered between February and December 2022. 208 veterinarians from 43 states participated in the study. Only 65 % of veterinarians reported awareness of hookworm prevalence. Hookworm infected dogs were encountered more frequently in the South than in Western states. Veterinarians perceived that hookworms were present in all breeds without breed predilection followed by mixed breeds, pit bulls and hound breeds. Most respondents reported that infections were rarely symptomatic, highlighting the importance of diagnostic testing. In-clinic diagnostic modalities were most preferred. Fenbendazole and pyrantel pamoate were the most commonly used anthelmintics. Most veterinarians followed up on infected dogs but retesting time after treatment varied. Awareness of multi-drug resistant hookworms was high but encountering persistent hookworm cases was lower. Veterinarians frequently educated clients about hookworms and prevention, but less about the zoonotic potential. This study provides insights for improving awareness, diagnostics, treatment protocols, and client education regarding canine hookworms in the U.S.. Overall, veterinarians play an active role in hookworm prevention and control.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 105501"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528824003680","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Canine hookworms (Ancylostoma caninum) are highly prevalent in pet dogs in the United States of America (U.S.). They pose a significant health risk to infected dogs and are also a potential risk to humans as zoonotic agents. Veterinarians play a crucial role in managing this threat through the diagnosis and treatment of infections in pet dogs. However, the rising incidence of anthelmintic resistance in U.S. hookworm populations necessitates increased awareness among veterinarians. To determine U.S. veterinarian's knowledge, perceptions and practices about canine hookworms, a cross-sectional online survey was administered between February and December 2022. 208 veterinarians from 43 states participated in the study. Only 65 % of veterinarians reported awareness of hookworm prevalence. Hookworm infected dogs were encountered more frequently in the South than in Western states. Veterinarians perceived that hookworms were present in all breeds without breed predilection followed by mixed breeds, pit bulls and hound breeds. Most respondents reported that infections were rarely symptomatic, highlighting the importance of diagnostic testing. In-clinic diagnostic modalities were most preferred. Fenbendazole and pyrantel pamoate were the most commonly used anthelmintics. Most veterinarians followed up on infected dogs but retesting time after treatment varied. Awareness of multi-drug resistant hookworms was high but encountering persistent hookworm cases was lower. Veterinarians frequently educated clients about hookworms and prevention, but less about the zoonotic potential. This study provides insights for improving awareness, diagnostics, treatment protocols, and client education regarding canine hookworms in the U.S.. Overall, veterinarians play an active role in hookworm prevention and control.
期刊介绍:
Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research.
The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally.
High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health.
Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.