Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of a semi-quantitative lateral flow assay for the detection of Cryptococcus antigen in serum and cerebrospinal fluid specimens.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Maria Camila Castañeda-Torres, Julián Arango, Alejandra Zuluaga, Álvaro Rúa-Giraldo, Diego H Caceres
{"title":"Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of a semi-quantitative lateral flow assay for the detection of Cryptococcus antigen in serum and cerebrospinal fluid specimens.","authors":"Maria Camila Castañeda-Torres, Julián Arango, Alejandra Zuluaga, Álvaro Rúa-Giraldo, Diego H Caceres","doi":"10.1093/mmy/myae116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cryptococcosis predominantly affects immunocompromised individuals, particularly those with advanced HIV disease, with meningitis being the most severe form and linked to high mortality. Diagnosis typically relies on rapid Cryptococcus antigen (CrAg) testing, and antigen titer quantification helps in early detection and assessing disease severity. However, conventional titer methods are often more expensive than qualitative antigen detection. This study assessed the diagnostic performance of a semi-quantitative Lateral Flow Assay (CrAgSQ LFA, IMMY™) for CrAg detection in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collected between 2014-2022. The CrAgSQ LFA was compared to the standard CrAg LFA (IMMY™) and Clarus Cryptococcal Ag enzyme immunoassay (EIA-CrAg, IMMY™). The CrAgSQ LFA demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity in both serum and CSF, with perfect agreement (kappa 1.00) with the CrAg LFA. Comparing the CrAgSQ LFA with the titer measurement results obtained using CrAg LFA, in category 1+, titers ranged from 1:2-1:20; in 2+, from 1:5-1:40; in 3+, from 1:20-1:2560; and in category 4+, from 1:320-1:2560.Titer results for the CrAgSQ LFA aligned well with CrAg LFA, and operator agreement was strong, with weighted kappa values of 0.926 and 0.966. The CrAg-EIA showed a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 100% using the manufacture cut-off (> 0.265), which improved to 96% sensitivity with an optimized cut-off value (>0.145). Overall, the CrAgSQ LFA demonstrated high accuracy and reliability, suggesting it could be a valuable tool for diagnosing cryptococcosis in the Americas.</p>","PeriodicalId":18586,"journal":{"name":"Medical mycology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical mycology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myae116","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cryptococcosis predominantly affects immunocompromised individuals, particularly those with advanced HIV disease, with meningitis being the most severe form and linked to high mortality. Diagnosis typically relies on rapid Cryptococcus antigen (CrAg) testing, and antigen titer quantification helps in early detection and assessing disease severity. However, conventional titer methods are often more expensive than qualitative antigen detection. This study assessed the diagnostic performance of a semi-quantitative Lateral Flow Assay (CrAgSQ LFA, IMMY™) for CrAg detection in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collected between 2014-2022. The CrAgSQ LFA was compared to the standard CrAg LFA (IMMY™) and Clarus Cryptococcal Ag enzyme immunoassay (EIA-CrAg, IMMY™). The CrAgSQ LFA demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity in both serum and CSF, with perfect agreement (kappa 1.00) with the CrAg LFA. Comparing the CrAgSQ LFA with the titer measurement results obtained using CrAg LFA, in category 1+, titers ranged from 1:2-1:20; in 2+, from 1:5-1:40; in 3+, from 1:20-1:2560; and in category 4+, from 1:320-1:2560.Titer results for the CrAgSQ LFA aligned well with CrAg LFA, and operator agreement was strong, with weighted kappa values of 0.926 and 0.966. The CrAg-EIA showed a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 100% using the manufacture cut-off (> 0.265), which improved to 96% sensitivity with an optimized cut-off value (>0.145). Overall, the CrAgSQ LFA demonstrated high accuracy and reliability, suggesting it could be a valuable tool for diagnosing cryptococcosis in the Americas.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical mycology
Medical mycology 医学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
632
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Medical Mycology is a peer-reviewed international journal that focuses on original and innovative basic and applied studies, as well as learned reviews on all aspects of medical, veterinary and environmental mycology as related to disease. The objective is to present the highest quality scientific reports from throughout the world on divergent topics. These topics include the phylogeny of fungal pathogens, epidemiology and public health mycology themes, new approaches in the diagnosis and treatment of mycoses including clinical trials and guidelines, pharmacology and antifungal susceptibilities, changes in taxonomy, description of new or unusual fungi associated with human or animal disease, immunology of fungal infections, vaccinology for prevention of fungal infections, pathogenesis and virulence, and the molecular biology of pathogenic fungi in vitro and in vivo, including genomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics, and proteomics. Case reports are no longer accepted. In addition, studies of natural products showing inhibitory activity against pathogenic fungi are not accepted without chemical characterization and identification of the compounds responsible for the inhibitory activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信