The general public's perception of robotic surgery - A scoping review.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Charlotte McDonnell, Michael Devine, Dara Kavanagh
{"title":"The general public's perception of robotic surgery - A scoping review.","authors":"Charlotte McDonnell, Michael Devine, Dara Kavanagh","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Robotic surgery is typically characterized by the telemanipulation of robotic arms controlled by a surgeon via a command system. Medical technology advancements have caused variations in how robotic surgery is conceptualised. It is important to ascertain the public's perception of robotic surgery, as this impacts decision making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A study protocol was developed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. All original research articles, abstracts, conference proceedings or grey literature were eligible. The Medline (Pubmed), Scopus, and Cochrane Databases, Google Scholar, white and green statement papers, and international guidelines were searched. A preliminary search identified key terms. Title and abstract screening was conducted. Full texts were appraised for eligibility. An inductive extraction process was utilized, grouping data into themes by content analysis, and developing a coding framework. Heterogeneity limited pooling of data and prevented aggregated data analysis. Therefore, NVivo software was used to augment this qualitative process and develop a meta-synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 8818 articles across the bibliographic databases. After inclusion of the grey literature 132 full text manuscripts were assessed. 35 of which were included. Three main themes were identified from the coding framework: understanding of robotic surgery, acceptance of robotic surgery, and perceptions of robotic surgery. Micro-construct subthemes included 'understanding of robotic autonomy, surgeon role, and outcomes', 'determinants of understanding', 'sources of information', 'intention to use', and 'determinants of acceptance'. Robotic surgery is perceived as a risky modality by the general public. They have a limited understanding of this surgical approach and the extent of autonomy a robotic system has. Sex, age, and residence are important factors effecting the degree of understanding and intention to undergo robotic surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic surgery is perceived as a risky procedure by the general public. They have limited understanding of the modality, and low rates of acceptance to undergo it fearing greater complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2024.12.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Robotic surgery is typically characterized by the telemanipulation of robotic arms controlled by a surgeon via a command system. Medical technology advancements have caused variations in how robotic surgery is conceptualised. It is important to ascertain the public's perception of robotic surgery, as this impacts decision making.

Methods: A study protocol was developed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. All original research articles, abstracts, conference proceedings or grey literature were eligible. The Medline (Pubmed), Scopus, and Cochrane Databases, Google Scholar, white and green statement papers, and international guidelines were searched. A preliminary search identified key terms. Title and abstract screening was conducted. Full texts were appraised for eligibility. An inductive extraction process was utilized, grouping data into themes by content analysis, and developing a coding framework. Heterogeneity limited pooling of data and prevented aggregated data analysis. Therefore, NVivo software was used to augment this qualitative process and develop a meta-synthesis.

Results: The search yielded 8818 articles across the bibliographic databases. After inclusion of the grey literature 132 full text manuscripts were assessed. 35 of which were included. Three main themes were identified from the coding framework: understanding of robotic surgery, acceptance of robotic surgery, and perceptions of robotic surgery. Micro-construct subthemes included 'understanding of robotic autonomy, surgeon role, and outcomes', 'determinants of understanding', 'sources of information', 'intention to use', and 'determinants of acceptance'. Robotic surgery is perceived as a risky modality by the general public. They have a limited understanding of this surgical approach and the extent of autonomy a robotic system has. Sex, age, and residence are important factors effecting the degree of understanding and intention to undergo robotic surgery.

Conclusion: Robotic surgery is perceived as a risky procedure by the general public. They have limited understanding of the modality, and low rates of acceptance to undergo it fearing greater complications.

公众对机器人手术的看法-范围审查。
机器人外科手术的典型特点是外科医生通过命令系统控制机器人手臂的远程操作。医疗技术的进步导致了机器人手术概念的变化。确定公众对机器人手术的看法很重要,因为这会影响决策。方法:根据PRISMA指南制定研究方案。所有的原创研究文章、摘要、会议记录或灰色文献都是合格的。检索了Medline (Pubmed)、Scopus和Cochrane数据库、谷歌Scholar、白色和绿色声明文件以及国际指南。初步搜索确定了关键术语。对题目和摘要进行筛选。全文被评估是否合格。采用归纳提取流程,通过内容分析将数据分组为主题,并开发编码框架。异质性限制了数据的汇集,并阻碍了汇总数据分析。因此,使用NVivo软件来增强这一定性过程并开发元综合。结果:在书目数据库中检索出8818篇文章。纳入灰色文献后,对132份全文手稿进行了评估。其中包括35个。从编码框架中确定了三个主题:对机器人手术的理解、对机器人手术的接受和对机器人手术的感知。微观结构的子主题包括“对机器人自主性、外科医生角色和结果的理解”、“理解的决定因素”、“信息来源”、“使用意图”和“接受的决定因素”。机器人手术被公众认为是一种有风险的手术方式。他们对这种手术方法和机器人系统的自主程度了解有限。性别、年龄和居住地是影响接受机器人手术的理解程度和意愿的重要因素。结论:机器人手术被公众认为是一种危险的手术。他们对手术方式的了解有限,接受率低,担心更大的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field. Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信