Steffan Griffin, Rebecca Syed Sheriff, Kathryn Dane, Kearnan Myall, Kaitlin Simpson, Heather Lewis, Caithriona Yeomans, Jon Patricios, Simon Kemp, Karim Khan, Debbie Palmer, Samantha Fawkner, Paul Kelly
{"title":"'Mental heAlth and well-being in rUgby pLayers' (MAUL) study: an online survey of diverse cohorts of rugby union players internationally.","authors":"Steffan Griffin, Rebecca Syed Sheriff, Kathryn Dane, Kearnan Myall, Kaitlin Simpson, Heather Lewis, Caithriona Yeomans, Jon Patricios, Simon Kemp, Karim Khan, Debbie Palmer, Samantha Fawkner, Paul Kelly","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mental health and well-being is a relatively under-researched area in rugby, especially outside the elite men's game. Evidence suggests that physical activity and sports benefit mental health and well-being, and rugby provides health-enhancing moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This cross-sectional study used an online approach and engaged national rugby governing bodies to understand adult rugby players' mental health and well-being and increase the diversity of the current evidence base.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>500 rugby players completed an online survey. 44% of participants identified as female, and 55% as male. The UK (67%), Ireland (15%) and South Africa (12%) were the countries with the highest representation. 71% of participants were amateur players, with elite players making up 20% of the population. 87% of players participated in contact forms of the game, with 9% predominantly playing non-contact rugby. Over 50% of participants reported that rugby impacted 'extremely' positively on both their mental health and well-being. Based on the Kessler psychological distress scale (K10), 57.8% of all respondents belonged to the 'psychologically well' group. Males were more likely to belong to this group than females (p=0.01). Non-contact and amateur players had lower scores of psychological distress than contact and professional players (p=0.001 and p=0.006), respectively. Non-contact players had higher well-being (Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale) scores than contact players (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides new insights into the mental health and well-being of a diverse group of rugby players.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":"10 4","pages":"e002164"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629002/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Mental health and well-being is a relatively under-researched area in rugby, especially outside the elite men's game. Evidence suggests that physical activity and sports benefit mental health and well-being, and rugby provides health-enhancing moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.
Objective: This cross-sectional study used an online approach and engaged national rugby governing bodies to understand adult rugby players' mental health and well-being and increase the diversity of the current evidence base.
Results: 500 rugby players completed an online survey. 44% of participants identified as female, and 55% as male. The UK (67%), Ireland (15%) and South Africa (12%) were the countries with the highest representation. 71% of participants were amateur players, with elite players making up 20% of the population. 87% of players participated in contact forms of the game, with 9% predominantly playing non-contact rugby. Over 50% of participants reported that rugby impacted 'extremely' positively on both their mental health and well-being. Based on the Kessler psychological distress scale (K10), 57.8% of all respondents belonged to the 'psychologically well' group. Males were more likely to belong to this group than females (p=0.01). Non-contact and amateur players had lower scores of psychological distress than contact and professional players (p=0.001 and p=0.006), respectively. Non-contact players had higher well-being (Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale) scores than contact players (p<0.001).
Conclusion: This study provides new insights into the mental health and well-being of a diverse group of rugby players.