Enoxaparin 40mg Twice Daily with Peak Anti-Xa Adjustments is Safe and Necessary to Achieve Therapeutic Chemoprophylaxis in Burn-Injured Patients.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Desiree N Pinto, Sophia Lee, Cory Johnson, Rola Halabi, Tuan D Le, Lauren T Moffatt, Bonnie C Carney, Shane K Mathew, Melissa McLawhorn, Shawn Tejiram, Taryn E Travis, Jeffrey W Shupp
{"title":"Enoxaparin 40mg Twice Daily with Peak Anti-Xa Adjustments is Safe and Necessary to Achieve Therapeutic Chemoprophylaxis in Burn-Injured Patients.","authors":"Desiree N Pinto, Sophia Lee, Cory Johnson, Rola Halabi, Tuan D Le, Lauren T Moffatt, Bonnie C Carney, Shane K Mathew, Melissa McLawhorn, Shawn Tejiram, Taryn E Travis, Jeffrey W Shupp","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irae201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Burn injury results in hypercoagulability and an increased venous thromboembolism risk. However, the most effective chemoprophylaxis for burn-injured patients has yet to be elucidated. Therefore, this study aims to identify the safety and efficacy of a burn center's venous thromboembolism protocol modification which increased the dose of enoxaparin from 40mg daily to 40mg twice daily with peak anti-Xa level adjustments. It was hypothesized that this change would not increase bleeding complications and would decrease venous thromboembolism rates. All adult, burn-injured patients admitted to a regional burn center were retrospectively reviewed one year before and after the implementation of this protocol modification. There were no differences in demographics, injury characteristics, or hospital length of stay between the pre- (n=432) and post-protocol modification (n=407) groups. Bleeding complications did not increase in the post-protocol group, including intraoperative blood loss (50 vs 25cc), the total number of transfusions (9.0 vs 6.0 units), and GI bleeding events (0.7 vs 0.2%) (all p>0.05). Most patients receiving enoxaparin 40mg twice daily achieved an initial therapeutic level based on peak anti-Xa measurements (46.5%), yet the rate of venous thromboembolisms between pre- and post-protocol groups was not statistically different (1.4 vs 0.7%, p=0.5072). Factors associated with an initial sub- or supratherapeutic peak anti-Xa level were percent total body surface area, weight, body mass index, and creatinine clearance. Overall, this study demonstrated that a higher dose of enoxaparin (40mg twice daily) with peak anti-Xa level adjustments was safe in burn-injured patients and necessary to obtain therapeutic levels of chemoprophylaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Burn injury results in hypercoagulability and an increased venous thromboembolism risk. However, the most effective chemoprophylaxis for burn-injured patients has yet to be elucidated. Therefore, this study aims to identify the safety and efficacy of a burn center's venous thromboembolism protocol modification which increased the dose of enoxaparin from 40mg daily to 40mg twice daily with peak anti-Xa level adjustments. It was hypothesized that this change would not increase bleeding complications and would decrease venous thromboembolism rates. All adult, burn-injured patients admitted to a regional burn center were retrospectively reviewed one year before and after the implementation of this protocol modification. There were no differences in demographics, injury characteristics, or hospital length of stay between the pre- (n=432) and post-protocol modification (n=407) groups. Bleeding complications did not increase in the post-protocol group, including intraoperative blood loss (50 vs 25cc), the total number of transfusions (9.0 vs 6.0 units), and GI bleeding events (0.7 vs 0.2%) (all p>0.05). Most patients receiving enoxaparin 40mg twice daily achieved an initial therapeutic level based on peak anti-Xa measurements (46.5%), yet the rate of venous thromboembolisms between pre- and post-protocol groups was not statistically different (1.4 vs 0.7%, p=0.5072). Factors associated with an initial sub- or supratherapeutic peak anti-Xa level were percent total body surface area, weight, body mass index, and creatinine clearance. Overall, this study demonstrated that a higher dose of enoxaparin (40mg twice daily) with peak anti-Xa level adjustments was safe in burn-injured patients and necessary to obtain therapeutic levels of chemoprophylaxis.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信