Julian V Kool van Langenberghe, Petra Schwarzer, Tobias Jahn, Christoph Tappeiner, Dimitrios Kyroudis, Eva Vrbka, David Goldblum
{"title":"Comparison of Ocular Biometry Measurements from Two Swept-Source OCT Devices: Eyestar 900 vs. Anterion.","authors":"Julian V Kool van Langenberghe, Petra Schwarzer, Tobias Jahn, Christoph Tappeiner, Dimitrios Kyroudis, Eva Vrbka, David Goldblum","doi":"10.1055/a-2463-4061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advanced swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) devices are the current gold standard for the measurement of ocular biometric and keratometric parameters, which are essential for the calculation and selection of intraocular lenses (IOLs). This study compares the agreement of two SS-OCT devices, the Eyestar 900 (Haag-Streit, Köniz, Switzerland) and the Anterion (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All patients undergoing cataract surgery or seeking consultation for corneal abnormalities between January 2024 and May 2024 were eligible for inclusion. Both eyes were included in the final analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A sample of 86 eyes from 43 patients was analysed. The mean differences (ES-AN) across all data between the Eyestar 900 (ES) and Anterion (AN) were as follows: anterior chamber depth (ACD) - 0.080 mm (ICC > 0.926), axial length (AL) 0.015 mm (ICC > 0.99), central corneal thickness (CCT) 0.914 µm (ICC > 0.921), corneal curvature along the flat meridian (K1) - 0.024 D (ICC > 0.904), and steep meridian (K2) - 0.210 D (ICC > 0.902), white-to-white corneal diameter (WTW) 0.215 mm (ICC > 0.81). There was excellent agreement for ACD, AL, CCT, K1, K2, and WTW. However, the corneal axis (AX) showed only moderate agreement (ICC > 0.389), with a mean difference of 5.97° and a notable standard deviation of 58.6°.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Eyestar 900 and Anterion demonstrated substantial agreement for all parameters except for the corneal meridian axis. It may be assumed that the inclusion of eyes with irregular corneal topographies may have contributed to this discrepancy.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Overall, there was a high level of agreement between the Eyestar 900 and Anterion. It is reasonable to assume that the measurement outcomes provided by both devices are interchangeable for the calculation of target refractive outcomes for intraocular lenses, with no clinically relevant differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":17904,"journal":{"name":"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2463-4061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Advanced swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) devices are the current gold standard for the measurement of ocular biometric and keratometric parameters, which are essential for the calculation and selection of intraocular lenses (IOLs). This study compares the agreement of two SS-OCT devices, the Eyestar 900 (Haag-Streit, Köniz, Switzerland) and the Anterion (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany).
Materials and methods: All patients undergoing cataract surgery or seeking consultation for corneal abnormalities between January 2024 and May 2024 were eligible for inclusion. Both eyes were included in the final analysis.
Results: A sample of 86 eyes from 43 patients was analysed. The mean differences (ES-AN) across all data between the Eyestar 900 (ES) and Anterion (AN) were as follows: anterior chamber depth (ACD) - 0.080 mm (ICC > 0.926), axial length (AL) 0.015 mm (ICC > 0.99), central corneal thickness (CCT) 0.914 µm (ICC > 0.921), corneal curvature along the flat meridian (K1) - 0.024 D (ICC > 0.904), and steep meridian (K2) - 0.210 D (ICC > 0.902), white-to-white corneal diameter (WTW) 0.215 mm (ICC > 0.81). There was excellent agreement for ACD, AL, CCT, K1, K2, and WTW. However, the corneal axis (AX) showed only moderate agreement (ICC > 0.389), with a mean difference of 5.97° and a notable standard deviation of 58.6°.
Conclusions: The Eyestar 900 and Anterion demonstrated substantial agreement for all parameters except for the corneal meridian axis. It may be assumed that the inclusion of eyes with irregular corneal topographies may have contributed to this discrepancy.
Summary: Overall, there was a high level of agreement between the Eyestar 900 and Anterion. It is reasonable to assume that the measurement outcomes provided by both devices are interchangeable for the calculation of target refractive outcomes for intraocular lenses, with no clinically relevant differences.
期刊介绍:
-Konzentriertes Fachwissen aus Klinik und Praxis:
Die entscheidenden Ergebnisse der internationalen Forschung - für Sie auf den Punkt gebracht und kritisch kommentiert,
Übersichtsarbeiten zu den maßgeblichen Themen der täglichen Praxis,
Top informiert - breite klinische Berichterstattung.
-CME-Punkte sammeln mit dem Refresher:
Effiziente, CME-zertifizierte Fortbildung, mit dem Refresher,
3 CME-Punkte pro Ausgabe - bis zu 36 CME-Punkte im Jahr!.
-Aktuelle Rubriken mit echtem Nutzwert:
Kurzreferate zu den wichtigsten Artikeln internationaler Zeitschriften,
Schwerpunktthema in jedem Heft: Ausführliche Übersichtsarbeiten zu den wichtigsten Themen der Ophthalmologie – so behalten Sie das gesamte Fach im Blick!,
Originalien mit den neuesten Entwicklungen,
Übersichten zu den relevanten Themen.