Complex kinship testing using the MGIEasy Pa-SNPs genotyping kit.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Qingzhen Zhang, Tingting Dong, Xueqian Wang, Xiaochang Zhang, Sen Yang, Peng Cheng, Zhe Zhou, Shengqi Wang
{"title":"Complex kinship testing using the MGIEasy Pa-SNPs genotyping kit.","authors":"Qingzhen Zhang, Tingting Dong, Xueqian Wang, Xiaochang Zhang, Sen Yang, Peng Cheng, Zhe Zhou, Shengqi Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00414-024-03376-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disaster victim identification and criminal investigations have intensified the demand of complex kinship testing. Compared to close relatives, distant relatives share fewer identical-by-descent genetic segments; therefore, more genetic markers are required to improve the system effectiveness. Driven by the progress of next-generation sequencing, several commercial or in-house panels, including a large number of genetic markers, have been developed and applied in forensic caseworks. However, few efficient panels are available for first cousins (FC) kinship testing. Here, we adopted the MGIEasy Pa-SNPs genotyping kit, a two-step multiplex PCR strategy to detect 2,009 SNPs, and evaluated their system effectiveness in complex kinship analysis. Samples from 10,000 pairs of relatives and unrelated individuals were simulated to evaluate the system power. Simultaneously, real samples were used to further confirm this, including 72 pairs of full siblings (FS), 52 pairs of uncle/aunt/-niece/nephew (UN), 92 pairs of FC, 79 pairs of first cousin once removed (1C1R), and 780 pairs of unrelated individuals. The results showed that this kit was sufficiently powerful in FS, UN, and FC versus unrelated kinship testing and could also discriminate part of 1C1R relatives against unrelated individuals. This method was also powerful in the kinship determination of FS versus UN, FS versus FC, FS versus 1C1R, and UN versus 1C1R kinship testing but had limited power to determine UN versus FC and FC versus 1C1R relationships. This study provides an effective strategy and guidance for complex kinship analysis in forensic practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14071,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-024-03376-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disaster victim identification and criminal investigations have intensified the demand of complex kinship testing. Compared to close relatives, distant relatives share fewer identical-by-descent genetic segments; therefore, more genetic markers are required to improve the system effectiveness. Driven by the progress of next-generation sequencing, several commercial or in-house panels, including a large number of genetic markers, have been developed and applied in forensic caseworks. However, few efficient panels are available for first cousins (FC) kinship testing. Here, we adopted the MGIEasy Pa-SNPs genotyping kit, a two-step multiplex PCR strategy to detect 2,009 SNPs, and evaluated their system effectiveness in complex kinship analysis. Samples from 10,000 pairs of relatives and unrelated individuals were simulated to evaluate the system power. Simultaneously, real samples were used to further confirm this, including 72 pairs of full siblings (FS), 52 pairs of uncle/aunt/-niece/nephew (UN), 92 pairs of FC, 79 pairs of first cousin once removed (1C1R), and 780 pairs of unrelated individuals. The results showed that this kit was sufficiently powerful in FS, UN, and FC versus unrelated kinship testing and could also discriminate part of 1C1R relatives against unrelated individuals. This method was also powerful in the kinship determination of FS versus UN, FS versus FC, FS versus 1C1R, and UN versus 1C1R kinship testing but had limited power to determine UN versus FC and FC versus 1C1R relationships. This study provides an effective strategy and guidance for complex kinship analysis in forensic practice.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
165
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Legal Medicine aims to improve the scientific resources used in the elucidation of crime and related forensic applications at a high level of evidential proof. The journal offers review articles tracing development in specific areas, with up-to-date analysis; original articles discussing significant recent research results; case reports describing interesting and exceptional examples; population data; letters to the editors; and technical notes, which appear in a section originally created for rapid publication of data in the dynamic field of DNA analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信