{"title":"Speech recognition and real-ear-measured amplification in hearing-aid users with various grades of hearing loss.","authors":"Max Engler, Frank Digeser, Ulrich Hoppe","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2426009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The relationship between aided speech recognition and hearing-aid (HA) amplification was investigated in a retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Design and study sample: </strong>Pure-tone thresholds, aided and unaided speech recognition and real-ear measurements of 635 ears in 374 HA users were reviewed. Ears were classified according to pure-tone average (PTA) and real-ear aided response (REAR) in relation to the targets of NAL-NL2 and DSL v5.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For DSL v5.0, compared with NAL-NL2, higher amplification was calculated almost consistently for input levels of 65 and 80 dB SPL. Speech-recognition scores were best when the REAR reached ±5 dB or exceeded 5 dB the DSL v5.0 target and were lowest when the REAR fell more than 5 dB below the NAL-NL2 target.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The greatest impact of the REAR on speech recognition was observed at hearing losses between 50 and 80 dB HL. It was found that to optimise speech recognition and audibility for patients in this range HA fittings should target DSL v5.0 prescription values. For hearing losses below 50 dB HL, both NAL-NL2 and DSL v5.0 may be considered for HA fitting. However, for hearing losses above 80 dB HL, aided speech recognition is insufficient in most cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2426009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The relationship between aided speech recognition and hearing-aid (HA) amplification was investigated in a retrospective study.
Design and study sample: Pure-tone thresholds, aided and unaided speech recognition and real-ear measurements of 635 ears in 374 HA users were reviewed. Ears were classified according to pure-tone average (PTA) and real-ear aided response (REAR) in relation to the targets of NAL-NL2 and DSL v5.0.
Results: For DSL v5.0, compared with NAL-NL2, higher amplification was calculated almost consistently for input levels of 65 and 80 dB SPL. Speech-recognition scores were best when the REAR reached ±5 dB or exceeded 5 dB the DSL v5.0 target and were lowest when the REAR fell more than 5 dB below the NAL-NL2 target.
Conclusions: The greatest impact of the REAR on speech recognition was observed at hearing losses between 50 and 80 dB HL. It was found that to optimise speech recognition and audibility for patients in this range HA fittings should target DSL v5.0 prescription values. For hearing losses below 50 dB HL, both NAL-NL2 and DSL v5.0 may be considered for HA fitting. However, for hearing losses above 80 dB HL, aided speech recognition is insufficient in most cases.
目的:通过回顾性研究,探讨辅助语音识别与助听器(HA)放大的关系。设计和研究样本:对374名HA用户的635只耳朵的纯音阈值、辅助和非辅助语音识别和实耳测量进行了回顾。根据与NAL-NL2和DSL v5.0相关的纯音平均(PTA)和实耳辅助响应(REAR)对耳朵进行分类。结果:对于DSL v5.0,与NAL-NL2相比,对于65和80 dB SPL的输入电平,计算出的放大几乎一致。当REAR达到DSL v5.0目标±5 dB或超过5 dB时,语音识别得分最高;当REAR低于NAL-NL2目标超过5 dB时,语音识别得分最低。结论:在听力损失在50 - 80 dB HL之间时,REAR对语音识别的影响最大。研究发现,为了优化该范围内患者的语音识别和可听性,HA配件应以DSL v5.0处方值为目标。对于低于50 dB HL的听力损失,可以考虑使用NAL-NL2和DSL v5.0进行HA拟合。然而,对于80 dB HL以上的听力损失,辅助语音识别在大多数情况下是不够的。
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.