{"title":"Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancy from donated frozen versus fresh oocytes.","authors":"Yuhuan Wang, Qiaoqiao Ding, Jialin Zou, Yue Niu, Daimin Wei","doi":"10.1080/14647273.2024.2430234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate whether oocyte cryopreservation affects obstetric and perinatal outcomes, 350 donor oocyte recipients with live-born singletons were divided into three groups: frozen embryo transfer (FET) with fresh oocytes (n = 101), fresh embryo transfer (ET) with frozen oocytes (n = 190), FET with frozen oocytes (n = 59). Gestational age differed significantly (P = 0.025), with the FET with frozen oocytes group showing longer gestational age than FET with fresh oocytes group (276 days vs. 272 days, P = 0.04). Other outcomes were comparable among groups. Subgroup analysis of FET pregnancies revealed no significant differences between frozen and fresh oocyte groups in gestational age (B 1.38, P = 0.749), birth weight (B -0.11, P = 0.530), premature birth rates (6.8% vs. 11.9%, P = 0.746), low birth weight (LBW) (5.1% vs. 12.9%, P = 0.865), macrosomia (5.1% vs. 4.0%, P = 0.976), small for gestational age (SGA) (6.8% vs. 11.9%, P = 0.599), large for gestational age (LGA) (22.0% vs. 18.8%, P = 0.943), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (10.2% vs. 11.9%, P = 0.343), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) (8.5% vs. 17.8%, P = 0.143) or placental abnormalities (8.5% vs. 19.8%, P = 0.133). The study confirmed oocyte cryopreservation did not affect birth weight or obstetrical complications in donor oocyte recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13006,"journal":{"name":"Human Fertility","volume":"28 1","pages":"2430234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Fertility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2024.2430234","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To evaluate whether oocyte cryopreservation affects obstetric and perinatal outcomes, 350 donor oocyte recipients with live-born singletons were divided into three groups: frozen embryo transfer (FET) with fresh oocytes (n = 101), fresh embryo transfer (ET) with frozen oocytes (n = 190), FET with frozen oocytes (n = 59). Gestational age differed significantly (P = 0.025), with the FET with frozen oocytes group showing longer gestational age than FET with fresh oocytes group (276 days vs. 272 days, P = 0.04). Other outcomes were comparable among groups. Subgroup analysis of FET pregnancies revealed no significant differences between frozen and fresh oocyte groups in gestational age (B 1.38, P = 0.749), birth weight (B -0.11, P = 0.530), premature birth rates (6.8% vs. 11.9%, P = 0.746), low birth weight (LBW) (5.1% vs. 12.9%, P = 0.865), macrosomia (5.1% vs. 4.0%, P = 0.976), small for gestational age (SGA) (6.8% vs. 11.9%, P = 0.599), large for gestational age (LGA) (22.0% vs. 18.8%, P = 0.943), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (10.2% vs. 11.9%, P = 0.343), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) (8.5% vs. 17.8%, P = 0.143) or placental abnormalities (8.5% vs. 19.8%, P = 0.133). The study confirmed oocyte cryopreservation did not affect birth weight or obstetrical complications in donor oocyte recipients.
期刊介绍:
Human Fertility is a leading international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice in the areas of human fertility and infertility. Topics included span the range from molecular medicine to healthcare delivery, and contributions are welcomed from professionals and academics from the spectrum of disciplines concerned with human fertility. It is published on behalf of the British Fertility Society.
The journal also provides a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed articles arising out of the activities of the Association of Biomedical Andrologists, the Association of Clinical Embryologists, the Association of Irish Clinical Embryologists, the British Andrology Society, the British Infertility Counselling Association, the Irish Fertility Society and the Royal College of Nursing Fertility Nurses Group.
All submissions are welcome. Articles considered include original papers, reviews, policy statements, commentaries, debates, correspondence, and reports of sessions at meetings. The journal also publishes refereed abstracts from the meetings of the constituent organizations.