Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancy from donated frozen versus fresh oocytes.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Human Fertility Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1080/14647273.2024.2430234
Yuhuan Wang, Qiaoqiao Ding, Jialin Zou, Yue Niu, Daimin Wei
{"title":"Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancy from donated frozen versus fresh oocytes.","authors":"Yuhuan Wang, Qiaoqiao Ding, Jialin Zou, Yue Niu, Daimin Wei","doi":"10.1080/14647273.2024.2430234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate whether oocyte cryopreservation affects obstetric and perinatal outcomes, 350 donor oocyte recipients with live-born singletons were divided into three groups: frozen embryo transfer (FET) with fresh oocytes (n = 101), fresh embryo transfer (ET) with frozen oocytes (n = 190), FET with frozen oocytes (n = 59). Gestational age differed significantly (P = 0.025), with the FET with frozen oocytes group showing longer gestational age than FET with fresh oocytes group (276 days vs. 272 days, P = 0.04). Other outcomes were comparable among groups. Subgroup analysis of FET pregnancies revealed no significant differences between frozen and fresh oocyte groups in gestational age (B 1.38, P = 0.749), birth weight (B -0.11, P = 0.530), premature birth rates (6.8% vs. 11.9%, P = 0.746), low birth weight (LBW) (5.1% vs. 12.9%, P = 0.865), macrosomia (5.1% vs. 4.0%, P = 0.976), small for gestational age (SGA) (6.8% vs. 11.9%, P = 0.599), large for gestational age (LGA) (22.0% vs. 18.8%, P = 0.943), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (10.2% vs. 11.9%, P = 0.343), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) (8.5% vs. 17.8%, P = 0.143) or placental abnormalities (8.5% vs. 19.8%, P = 0.133). The study confirmed oocyte cryopreservation did not affect birth weight or obstetrical complications in donor oocyte recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13006,"journal":{"name":"Human Fertility","volume":"28 1","pages":"2430234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Fertility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2024.2430234","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate whether oocyte cryopreservation affects obstetric and perinatal outcomes, 350 donor oocyte recipients with live-born singletons were divided into three groups: frozen embryo transfer (FET) with fresh oocytes (n = 101), fresh embryo transfer (ET) with frozen oocytes (n = 190), FET with frozen oocytes (n = 59). Gestational age differed significantly (P = 0.025), with the FET with frozen oocytes group showing longer gestational age than FET with fresh oocytes group (276 days vs. 272 days, P = 0.04). Other outcomes were comparable among groups. Subgroup analysis of FET pregnancies revealed no significant differences between frozen and fresh oocyte groups in gestational age (B 1.38, P = 0.749), birth weight (B -0.11, P = 0.530), premature birth rates (6.8% vs. 11.9%, P = 0.746), low birth weight (LBW) (5.1% vs. 12.9%, P = 0.865), macrosomia (5.1% vs. 4.0%, P = 0.976), small for gestational age (SGA) (6.8% vs. 11.9%, P = 0.599), large for gestational age (LGA) (22.0% vs. 18.8%, P = 0.943), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (10.2% vs. 11.9%, P = 0.343), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) (8.5% vs. 17.8%, P = 0.143) or placental abnormalities (8.5% vs. 19.8%, P = 0.133). The study confirmed oocyte cryopreservation did not affect birth weight or obstetrical complications in donor oocyte recipients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Fertility
Human Fertility OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Human Fertility is a leading international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice in the areas of human fertility and infertility. Topics included span the range from molecular medicine to healthcare delivery, and contributions are welcomed from professionals and academics from the spectrum of disciplines concerned with human fertility. It is published on behalf of the British Fertility Society. The journal also provides a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed articles arising out of the activities of the Association of Biomedical Andrologists, the Association of Clinical Embryologists, the Association of Irish Clinical Embryologists, the British Andrology Society, the British Infertility Counselling Association, the Irish Fertility Society and the Royal College of Nursing Fertility Nurses Group. All submissions are welcome. Articles considered include original papers, reviews, policy statements, commentaries, debates, correspondence, and reports of sessions at meetings. The journal also publishes refereed abstracts from the meetings of the constituent organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信