Predictors of VILI risk: driving pressure, 4DPRR and mechanical power ratio-an experimental study.

IF 2.8 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Mauro Galizia, Valentina Ghidoni, Giulia Catozzi, Stefano Giovanazzi, Domenico Nocera, Beatrice Donati, Tommaso Pozzi, Rosanna D'Albo, Mattia Busana, Federica Romitti, Peter Herrmann, Onnen Moerer, Konrad Meissner, Michael Quintel, Luigi Camporota, Luciano Gattinoni
{"title":"Predictors of VILI risk: driving pressure, 4DPRR and mechanical power ratio-an experimental study.","authors":"Mauro Galizia, Valentina Ghidoni, Giulia Catozzi, Stefano Giovanazzi, Domenico Nocera, Beatrice Donati, Tommaso Pozzi, Rosanna D'Albo, Mattia Busana, Federica Romitti, Peter Herrmann, Onnen Moerer, Konrad Meissner, Michael Quintel, Luigi Camporota, Luciano Gattinoni","doi":"10.1186/s40635-024-00697-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) is one of the side effects of mechanical ventilation during ARDS; a prerequisite for averting it is the quantification of its risk factors associated with a given ventilatory setting. Many clinical variables have been proposed as predictors of VILI, of which driving pressure is the most widely used. In this study, we compared the performance of driving pressure, four times the driving pressure added to respiratory rate (4DPRR) and mechanical power ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a study population of 121 previously healthy pigs exposed to harmful ventilation, we compared the association of driving pressure, 4DPRR and mechanical power ratio to lung weight, lung wet-to-dry and total histological score. All the three variables were associated with these outcomes. Driving pressure, 4DPRR and mechanical power ratio increase linearly with the lung weight (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> of 0.27, 0.36 and 0.40, respectively), the lung wet-to-dry ratio (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> of 0.19, 0.25 and 0.37) and the total histological score (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> of 0.26, 0.38 and 0.26). Using a multiple linear regression model with forward analysis, starting with tidal volume and progressively adding respiratory rate and positive end-expiratory pressure, and comparing the topic with the outcome variables, we obtained R<sup>2</sup> values, respectively, of 0.07, 0.20, 0.42 for lung weight, 0.09, 0.19, 0.26 for lung wet-to-dry ratio and 0.07, 0.27, 0.43 for total histological score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Driving pressure, 4DPRR and mechanical power ratio, were all associated with lung injury in healthy animals undergoing mechanical ventilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"12 1","pages":"116"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11635077/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00697-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) is one of the side effects of mechanical ventilation during ARDS; a prerequisite for averting it is the quantification of its risk factors associated with a given ventilatory setting. Many clinical variables have been proposed as predictors of VILI, of which driving pressure is the most widely used. In this study, we compared the performance of driving pressure, four times the driving pressure added to respiratory rate (4DPRR) and mechanical power ratio.

Results: In a study population of 121 previously healthy pigs exposed to harmful ventilation, we compared the association of driving pressure, 4DPRR and mechanical power ratio to lung weight, lung wet-to-dry and total histological score. All the three variables were associated with these outcomes. Driving pressure, 4DPRR and mechanical power ratio increase linearly with the lung weight (adjusted R2 of 0.27, 0.36 and 0.40, respectively), the lung wet-to-dry ratio (adjusted R2 of 0.19, 0.25 and 0.37) and the total histological score (adjusted R2 of 0.26, 0.38 and 0.26). Using a multiple linear regression model with forward analysis, starting with tidal volume and progressively adding respiratory rate and positive end-expiratory pressure, and comparing the topic with the outcome variables, we obtained R2 values, respectively, of 0.07, 0.20, 0.42 for lung weight, 0.09, 0.19, 0.26 for lung wet-to-dry ratio and 0.07, 0.27, 0.43 for total histological score.

Conclusions: Driving pressure, 4DPRR and mechanical power ratio, were all associated with lung injury in healthy animals undergoing mechanical ventilation.

VILI风险预测因子:驾驶压力、4DPRR和机械功率比的实验研究
背景:呼吸机致肺损伤(VILI)是ARDS机械通气的不良反应之一;避免它的先决条件是量化与给定通气设置相关的风险因素。许多临床变量被提出作为VILI的预测因子,其中驾驶压力是应用最广泛的。在本研究中,我们比较了驾驶压力、四倍驾驶压力对呼吸速率(4DPRR)和机械功率比的性能。结果:在121头暴露于有害通气的健康猪的研究群体中,我们比较了驱动压力、4DPRR和机械功率比与肺重量、肺干湿比和总组织学评分的关系。所有这三个变量都与这些结果有关。驱动压力、4DPRR和机械功率比随肺重(调整R2分别为0.27、0.36和0.40)、肺干湿比(调整R2分别为0.19、0.25和0.37)和总组织学评分(调整R2分别为0.26、0.38和0.26)呈线性增加。采用多元线性回归模型进行正向分析,从潮气量开始,逐步增加呼吸频率和呼气末正压,并将主题与结局变量进行比较,得到肺重的R2值分别为0.07、0.20、0.42,肺湿干比的R2值分别为0.09、0.19、0.26,总组织学评分的R2值分别为0.07、0.27、0.43。结论:机械通气健康动物的驱动压力、4DPRR和机械功率比均与肺损伤有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信