Acceptability and Feasibility of the English Version of Elevida, a Self-Guided Online Fatigue Intervention for People With Multiple Sclerosis.

Q1 Nursing
International journal of MS care Pub Date : 2024-12-09 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.7224/1537-2073.2023-048
Jo Lane, Carmel Poyser, Yixuan Zhao, Robyn M Lucas, Björn Meyer, Christoph Heesen, Nicolas Cherbuin, Anne Brüstle, Susy Macqueen, Alice Richardson, Christian Lueck, Stefan M Gold
{"title":"Acceptability and Feasibility of the English Version of Elevida, a Self-Guided Online Fatigue Intervention for People With Multiple Sclerosis.","authors":"Jo Lane, Carmel Poyser, Yixuan Zhao, Robyn M Lucas, Björn Meyer, Christoph Heesen, Nicolas Cherbuin, Anne Brüstle, Susy Macqueen, Alice Richardson, Christian Lueck, Stefan M Gold","doi":"10.7224/1537-2073.2023-048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fatigue is common in multiple sclerosis (MS); it significantly impairs quality of life, and treatment options are limited. A randomized controlled trial of Elevida, a self-guided, online German fatigue intervention, showed significant benefit. We tested an English version of Elevida with people with MS in Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were volunteers with MS who self-reported at least mild fatigue (≥ 43 on the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions scale), some mobility (Expanded Disability Status Scale < 8), and no or mild cognitive difficulties (≤ 32 on the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Questionnaire). Participants completed the 9-week English Elevida program, commenting on and rating its acceptability. The Chalder Fatigue Scale was completed at baseline, end-of-program, and 2 months later. We undertook qualitative (thematic analysis) and quantitative (before/after differences, tested using paired <i>t</i> test) analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight people with MS expressed an interest in the study; 26 were eligible; 20 began the study. Fifteen participants (75%) completed the program (mean [SD]: 58.9 [10.5] years of age, 67% women, 9 with relapsing MS, 6 with progressive MS). Over 90% of completing participants rated acceptability as good or very good, and approximately 70% found the program helpful. Three themes were identified: Positive or negative comments on program features, incorrect assumptions in program content, and personal experiences and reflections. Significant improvement (<i>P</i> < .01) in fatigue scores from baseline to program completion was maintained 2 months after program completion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elevida was acceptable and effective for MS-related fatigue. Identified themes will guide further development of the program to satisfy users' sense of autonomy, competence, and relatedness.</p>","PeriodicalId":14150,"journal":{"name":"International journal of MS care","volume":"26 Q4","pages":"347-354"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11628539/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of MS care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2023-048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fatigue is common in multiple sclerosis (MS); it significantly impairs quality of life, and treatment options are limited. A randomized controlled trial of Elevida, a self-guided, online German fatigue intervention, showed significant benefit. We tested an English version of Elevida with people with MS in Australia.

Methods: Participants were volunteers with MS who self-reported at least mild fatigue (≥ 43 on the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions scale), some mobility (Expanded Disability Status Scale < 8), and no or mild cognitive difficulties (≤ 32 on the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Questionnaire). Participants completed the 9-week English Elevida program, commenting on and rating its acceptability. The Chalder Fatigue Scale was completed at baseline, end-of-program, and 2 months later. We undertook qualitative (thematic analysis) and quantitative (before/after differences, tested using paired t test) analyses.

Results: Thirty-eight people with MS expressed an interest in the study; 26 were eligible; 20 began the study. Fifteen participants (75%) completed the program (mean [SD]: 58.9 [10.5] years of age, 67% women, 9 with relapsing MS, 6 with progressive MS). Over 90% of completing participants rated acceptability as good or very good, and approximately 70% found the program helpful. Three themes were identified: Positive or negative comments on program features, incorrect assumptions in program content, and personal experiences and reflections. Significant improvement (P < .01) in fatigue scores from baseline to program completion was maintained 2 months after program completion.

Conclusions: Elevida was acceptable and effective for MS-related fatigue. Identified themes will guide further development of the program to satisfy users' sense of autonomy, competence, and relatedness.

多发性硬化症患者自主在线疲劳干预系统Elevida英文版的可接受性和可行性
背景:疲劳在多发性硬化症(MS)中很常见;它严重影响生活质量,治疗选择有限。一项随机对照试验显示,一种自我指导的在线德国疲劳干预疗法Elevida有显著的疗效。我们在澳大利亚的多发性硬化症患者身上测试了英文版的Elevida。方法:参与者是自我报告至少有轻度疲劳(运动和认知功能疲劳量表≥43),有一定活动能力(扩展残疾状态量表< 8),无或轻度认知困难(多发性硬化症神经心理问卷≤32)的MS志愿者。参与者完成了为期9周的英语课程,并对其可接受性进行了评论和评级。在基线、项目结束和2个月后完成Chalder疲劳量表。我们进行了定性(专题分析)和定量(差异前后,使用配对t检验)分析。结果:38名MS患者表示对这项研究感兴趣;26例符合条件;20岁开始这项研究。15名参与者(75%)完成了该计划(平均[SD]: 58.9[10.5]岁,67%为女性,9名多发性硬化症复发,6名多发性硬化症进展)。超过90%的完成参与者将可接受性评为好或非常好,大约70%的人认为该计划有帮助。确定了三个主题:对节目功能的正面或负面评论,节目内容的错误假设,以及个人经历和反思。疲劳评分从基线到项目完成后2个月有显著改善(P < 0.01)。结论:依立达治疗多发性硬化症相关疲劳可接受且有效。确定的主题将指导程序的进一步发展,以满足用户的自主性、能力和相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of MS care
International journal of MS care Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信