Initial evaluation of 4-palmitoyloxy butyrate in whole blood as potential biomarker after γ-hydroxybutyric acid intake.

Abstract

The problem of finding a suitable biomarker to widen the detection window of γ-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) intake remains a challenge in forensic toxicology. Based on previously published results, the present study deals with the evaluation of a fatty acid ester of GHB (4-palmitoyloxy butyrate (GHB-Pal)) in whole blood as a potential biomarker to extend the detection window of GHB use e.g. in drug-facilitated sexual assaults (DFSA). A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the quantification of GHB-Pal in whole blood was validated. Whole blood samples were collected from subjects involed in police roadside controls (n=113) and from narcolepsy patients (n=10) after the controlled administration of Xyrem® (sodium oxybate). Both sample collectives were previously tested for GHB using two different methods: ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). In samples from routine police casework, GHB-Pal was detected in 67 out of 113 analysed GHB-positive samples with a mean concentration of 0.8 ng/mL ± 0.5 ng/mL (standard deviation). Among samples that were tested positive for both compounds, no linear correlation was observed between GHB and GHB-Pal concentrations (r=0.508). In contrast, GHB-Pal was not detected in any of the blood samples analysed from the patients. The absence of GHB and GHB-Pal in the patient cohort may be attributed to the time interval between dose intake and blood collection (approx. 3 and 6 h), during which GHB was eliminated from the body. Furthermore, GHB-Pal was only detectable at a GHB concentration of at least 16 µg/mL, which indicates that endogenous concentrations or low GHB doses may not be sufficient for GHB-Pal formation. Due to missing correlation between both compounds and the lack of GHB-Pal detection several hours after GHB administration, it can be assumed that GHB-Pal in blood is not a suitable biomarker to widen the detection window of GHB.