Lurbinectedin is an effective alternative to platinum rechallenge and may restore platinum sensitivity in patients with sensitive relapsed small cell lung cancer.
Manuel Dómine Gómez, Vivek Subbiah, Solange Peters, María Angeles Sala, José Trigo, Luis Paz-Ares, Antonio Nieto Archilla, Javier Gomez Garcia, Cristina Alvarez García, José Antonio López-Vilariño de Ramos, Carmen Kahatt Lopez, Cristian M Fernandez
{"title":"Lurbinectedin is an effective alternative to platinum rechallenge and may restore platinum sensitivity in patients with sensitive relapsed small cell lung cancer.","authors":"Manuel Dómine Gómez, Vivek Subbiah, Solange Peters, María Angeles Sala, José Trigo, Luis Paz-Ares, Antonio Nieto Archilla, Javier Gomez Garcia, Cristina Alvarez García, José Antonio López-Vilariño de Ramos, Carmen Kahatt Lopez, Cristian M Fernandez","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2024.2438067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Platinum rechallenge is recommended for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who relapse ≥90 days after completing first-line chemotherapy, although it may not always be the most suitable option.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Articles for review were identified via PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov searches, supplemented with non-indexed publications (e.g. conference abstracts) known to the manufacturer. We examined evidence for platinum re-exposure in patients with sensitive relapsed SCLC, and present lurbinectedin as a potential alternative. The complementary mechanisms of action of lurbinectedin and platinum, owing to opposite sensitivity of SCLC cells, may resensitize tumor cells to platinum. As efficacy outcomes with lurbinectedin are equivalent or better than those with platinum rechallenge and its hematological safety profile is more favorable, achieving maximum dose intensity is more likely. The simpler dosing schedule of lurbinectedin (1 vs 3 days) and lack of need for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor primary prophylaxis lessens treatment burden.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Incorporation of lurbinectedin into therapeutic algorithms for relapsed SCLC has challenged long-established treatment paradigms. Initial evidence indicates that using lurbinectedin after failure of first-line platinum may prolong the platinum-free interval and reserve platinum for later use. Current evidence supports lurbinectedin as a second-line option in patients with sensitive relapsed SCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2024.2438067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Platinum rechallenge is recommended for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who relapse ≥90 days after completing first-line chemotherapy, although it may not always be the most suitable option.
Areas covered: Articles for review were identified via PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov searches, supplemented with non-indexed publications (e.g. conference abstracts) known to the manufacturer. We examined evidence for platinum re-exposure in patients with sensitive relapsed SCLC, and present lurbinectedin as a potential alternative. The complementary mechanisms of action of lurbinectedin and platinum, owing to opposite sensitivity of SCLC cells, may resensitize tumor cells to platinum. As efficacy outcomes with lurbinectedin are equivalent or better than those with platinum rechallenge and its hematological safety profile is more favorable, achieving maximum dose intensity is more likely. The simpler dosing schedule of lurbinectedin (1 vs 3 days) and lack of need for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor primary prophylaxis lessens treatment burden.
Expert opinion: Incorporation of lurbinectedin into therapeutic algorithms for relapsed SCLC has challenged long-established treatment paradigms. Initial evidence indicates that using lurbinectedin after failure of first-line platinum may prolong the platinum-free interval and reserve platinum for later use. Current evidence supports lurbinectedin as a second-line option in patients with sensitive relapsed SCLC.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches.
Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.