Lurbinectedin is an effective alternative to platinum rechallenge and may restore platinum sensitivity in patients with sensitive relapsed small cell lung cancer.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1080/14737140.2024.2438067
Manuel Dómine Gómez, Vivek Subbiah, Solange Peters, María Angeles Sala, José Trigo, Luis Paz-Ares, Antonio Nieto Archilla, Javier Gomez Garcia, Cristina Alvarez García, José Antonio López-Vilariño de Ramos, Carmen Kahatt Lopez, Cristian M Fernandez
{"title":"Lurbinectedin is an effective alternative to platinum rechallenge and may restore platinum sensitivity in patients with sensitive relapsed small cell lung cancer.","authors":"Manuel Dómine Gómez, Vivek Subbiah, Solange Peters, María Angeles Sala, José Trigo, Luis Paz-Ares, Antonio Nieto Archilla, Javier Gomez Garcia, Cristina Alvarez García, José Antonio López-Vilariño de Ramos, Carmen Kahatt Lopez, Cristian M Fernandez","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2024.2438067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Platinum rechallenge is recommended for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who relapse ≥90 days after completing first-line chemotherapy, although it may not always be the most suitable option.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Articles for review were identified via PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov searches, supplemented with non-indexed publications (e.g. conference abstracts) known to the manufacturer. We examined evidence for platinum re-exposure in patients with sensitive relapsed SCLC, and present lurbinectedin as a potential alternative. The complementary mechanisms of action of lurbinectedin and platinum, owing to opposite sensitivity of SCLC cells, may resensitize tumor cells to platinum. As efficacy outcomes with lurbinectedin are equivalent or better than those with platinum rechallenge and its hematological safety profile is more favorable, achieving maximum dose intensity is more likely. The simpler dosing schedule of lurbinectedin (1 vs 3 days) and lack of need for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor primary prophylaxis lessens treatment burden.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Incorporation of lurbinectedin into therapeutic algorithms for relapsed SCLC has challenged long-established treatment paradigms. Initial evidence indicates that using lurbinectedin after failure of first-line platinum may prolong the platinum-free interval and reserve platinum for later use. Current evidence supports lurbinectedin as a second-line option in patients with sensitive relapsed SCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"27-40"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2024.2438067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Platinum rechallenge is recommended for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who relapse ≥90 days after completing first-line chemotherapy, although it may not always be the most suitable option.

Areas covered: Articles for review were identified via PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov searches, supplemented with non-indexed publications (e.g. conference abstracts) known to the manufacturer. We examined evidence for platinum re-exposure in patients with sensitive relapsed SCLC, and present lurbinectedin as a potential alternative. The complementary mechanisms of action of lurbinectedin and platinum, owing to opposite sensitivity of SCLC cells, may resensitize tumor cells to platinum. As efficacy outcomes with lurbinectedin are equivalent or better than those with platinum rechallenge and its hematological safety profile is more favorable, achieving maximum dose intensity is more likely. The simpler dosing schedule of lurbinectedin (1 vs 3 days) and lack of need for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor primary prophylaxis lessens treatment burden.

Expert opinion: Incorporation of lurbinectedin into therapeutic algorithms for relapsed SCLC has challenged long-established treatment paradigms. Initial evidence indicates that using lurbinectedin after failure of first-line platinum may prolong the platinum-free interval and reserve platinum for later use. Current evidence supports lurbinectedin as a second-line option in patients with sensitive relapsed SCLC.

Lurbinectedin是铂再挑战的有效替代品,可能恢复敏感复发小细胞肺癌患者的铂敏感性。
简介:对于完成一线化疗后复发≥90天的小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者(敏感性复发),一般推荐铂类再挑战;然而,它可能并不总是最合适或最方便的选择。涵盖领域:审查文章主要通过PubMed检索确定,检索词为“lurbinectedin”、“platinum rechallenge”和“小细胞肺癌”,并通过ClinicalTrials.gov检索和lurbinectedin制造商已知的相关文章(例如会议摘要)进行补充。对敏感性复发SCLC患者铂再暴露的证据进行了研究,lurbinectedin被认为是一种潜在的替代方案。由于SCLC细胞的敏感性相反,lurbinectedin和铂的互补作用机制可能使肿瘤细胞对铂重新敏感。由于lurbinectedin的疗效结果与铂再挑战相当或更好,其血液学安全性更有利,因此更有可能达到最大剂量强度。lurbinectedin较简单的给药计划(1天vs 3天)和不需要粒细胞集落刺激因子一级预防,相对于铂再挑战减轻了治疗负担。专家意见:将lurbinectedin纳入复发性SCLC的治疗方案挑战了长期建立的治疗范例,并提出了有关治疗策略的问题。初步证据表明,在一线铂失效后使用lurbinectedin可以延长无铂间隔时间,并为以后使用保留铂。目前的证据支持lurbinectedin作为敏感性复发SCLC患者的二线选择,提供了铂再挑战的可行替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches. Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信