Yuqi Tan, Zheng Ye, Xinyang Lv, Yiteng Zhang, Meng Zhang, Chunchao Xia, Zhenlin Li
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of simultaneous multislice diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating breast lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yuqi Tan, Zheng Ye, Xinyang Lv, Yiteng Zhang, Meng Zhang, Chunchao Xia, Zhenlin Li","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqae240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the diagnostic performance of simultaneous multislice diffusion-weighted imaging (SMS-DWI) in differentiating malignant and benign breast lesions, and compare it with conventional single shot and readout segmented echo planar imaging without the SMS technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify comparative studies reporting the diagnostic performance of SMS-DWI and conventional DWI in patients with breast lesions. Histopathological analysis was used as a reference standard for malignant breast lesions. The methodological quality was evaluated using QUADAS-2 scale. The summary sensitivity, summary specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of the summarized receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated and compared between SMS-DWI and conventional DWI using a bivariate random-effects model. Heterogeneity was explored with meta-regression and subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies with 626 patients and 649 breast lesions (benign: 222, malignant: 427) were included. The summary sensitivity, summary specificity, and AUC for SMS-DWI were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.78-0.95), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.81-0.98), and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.98), respectively, and those for conventional DWI were 0.90 (0.95 CI: 0.84-0.94), 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80-0.92), and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92-0.96), respectively. The diagnostic performance was not significantly different between SMS-DWI and conventional DWI (P = .337).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SMS-DWI has high diagnostic performance in differentiating breast lesions, which is not significantly different from the conventional DWI.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>There is no significant difference between SMS-DWI and conventional DWI in differentiating breast lesions, suggesting SMS-DWI may be a potential alternative to conventional DWI in breast imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae240","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the diagnostic performance of simultaneous multislice diffusion-weighted imaging (SMS-DWI) in differentiating malignant and benign breast lesions, and compare it with conventional single shot and readout segmented echo planar imaging without the SMS technique.
Methods: The literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify comparative studies reporting the diagnostic performance of SMS-DWI and conventional DWI in patients with breast lesions. Histopathological analysis was used as a reference standard for malignant breast lesions. The methodological quality was evaluated using QUADAS-2 scale. The summary sensitivity, summary specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of the summarized receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated and compared between SMS-DWI and conventional DWI using a bivariate random-effects model. Heterogeneity was explored with meta-regression and subgroup analyses.
Results: Six studies with 626 patients and 649 breast lesions (benign: 222, malignant: 427) were included. The summary sensitivity, summary specificity, and AUC for SMS-DWI were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.78-0.95), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.81-0.98), and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.98), respectively, and those for conventional DWI were 0.90 (0.95 CI: 0.84-0.94), 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80-0.92), and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92-0.96), respectively. The diagnostic performance was not significantly different between SMS-DWI and conventional DWI (P = .337).
Conclusions: SMS-DWI has high diagnostic performance in differentiating breast lesions, which is not significantly different from the conventional DWI.
Advances in knowledge: There is no significant difference between SMS-DWI and conventional DWI in differentiating breast lesions, suggesting SMS-DWI may be a potential alternative to conventional DWI in breast imaging.
期刊介绍:
BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences.
Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840
- Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks
- ISSN: 0007-1285
- eISSN: 1748-880X
Open Access option