Daniel L Ashmore, Daniel M Baker, Timothy R Wilson, Vanessa Halliday, Matthew J Lee
{"title":"Barriers faced by surgeons in identifying and managing malnutrition in emergency general surgery: A qualitative study.","authors":"Daniel L Ashmore, Daniel M Baker, Timothy R Wilson, Vanessa Halliday, Matthew J Lee","doi":"10.1111/codi.17261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Many patients undergoing emergency surgery are malnourished. Identifying malnutrition is a prerequisite to offering targeted nutritional support. Guidelines exist but little is known regarding exactly how surgeons identify malnutrition, or the barriers that influence surgeons' clinical decision-making. The aim of this work was to explore how consultant surgeons identify malnutrition in emergency general surgery (EGS) patients and the barriers to nutritional assessment and intervention.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Consultant surgeons with emergency surgery duties were invited to participate. Semi-structured interviews were conducted online, audiovisually recorded and transcribed. An inductive approach was used for data analysis using the framework method. Coding and analysis were performed by two independent researchers using NVivo software. Themes were developed and reviewed with the supervising team. Interviews continued until data saturation was reached. Ethical approval was gained prior to interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen interviews were conducted across three hospital settings. Identification of malnutrition consisted of three themes: 'The surgeon' (knowledge, experience, planning ahead); 'The patient' (selection, composition, clinical progress, operative considerations); and 'The institution' (collaboration, extended surgical team). Three themes encompassed barriers experienced: 'The surgeon' (understanding, culture, ownership, time constraints); 'The institution' (provision, staffing, conflict, hospital setting); and 'The wider context' (research, external factors). These influenced clinical decision-making, which had two themes: 'To join or not to join' (risk taking, site of anastomosis) and 'Nutritional support' (timing, referral pathways).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The identification and management of malnutrition in EGS is fraught with barriers, impacting operative and clinical decision-making. Improvements in surgeon education, culture, collaborative working and resources are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683319/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.17261","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Many patients undergoing emergency surgery are malnourished. Identifying malnutrition is a prerequisite to offering targeted nutritional support. Guidelines exist but little is known regarding exactly how surgeons identify malnutrition, or the barriers that influence surgeons' clinical decision-making. The aim of this work was to explore how consultant surgeons identify malnutrition in emergency general surgery (EGS) patients and the barriers to nutritional assessment and intervention.
Method: Consultant surgeons with emergency surgery duties were invited to participate. Semi-structured interviews were conducted online, audiovisually recorded and transcribed. An inductive approach was used for data analysis using the framework method. Coding and analysis were performed by two independent researchers using NVivo software. Themes were developed and reviewed with the supervising team. Interviews continued until data saturation was reached. Ethical approval was gained prior to interviews.
Results: Eighteen interviews were conducted across three hospital settings. Identification of malnutrition consisted of three themes: 'The surgeon' (knowledge, experience, planning ahead); 'The patient' (selection, composition, clinical progress, operative considerations); and 'The institution' (collaboration, extended surgical team). Three themes encompassed barriers experienced: 'The surgeon' (understanding, culture, ownership, time constraints); 'The institution' (provision, staffing, conflict, hospital setting); and 'The wider context' (research, external factors). These influenced clinical decision-making, which had two themes: 'To join or not to join' (risk taking, site of anastomosis) and 'Nutritional support' (timing, referral pathways).
Conclusions: The identification and management of malnutrition in EGS is fraught with barriers, impacting operative and clinical decision-making. Improvements in surgeon education, culture, collaborative working and resources are needed.
期刊介绍:
Diseases of the colon and rectum are common and offer a number of exciting challenges. Clinical, diagnostic and basic science research is expanding rapidly. There is increasing demand from purchasers of health care and patients for clinicians to keep abreast of the latest research and developments, and to translate these into routine practice. Technological advances in diagnosis, surgical technique, new pharmaceuticals, molecular genetics and other basic sciences have transformed many aspects of how these diseases are managed. Such progress will accelerate.
Colorectal Disease offers a real benefit to subscribers and authors. It is first and foremost a vehicle for publishing original research relating to the demanding, rapidly expanding field of colorectal diseases.
Essential for surgeons, pathologists, oncologists, gastroenterologists and health professionals caring for patients with a disease of the lower GI tract, Colorectal Disease furthers education and inter-professional development by including regular review articles and discussions of current controversies.
Note that the journal does not usually accept paediatric surgical papers.