Uncertainties about the benefit-risk balance of oncology medicines assessed by the European Medicines Agency.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
ESMO Open Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103991
A C Taams, C A Herberts, A C G Egberts, N Zafiropoulos, F Pignatti, L T Bloem
{"title":"Uncertainties about the benefit-risk balance of oncology medicines assessed by the European Medicines Agency.","authors":"A C Taams, C A Herberts, A C G Egberts, N Zafiropoulos, F Pignatti, L T Bloem","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug regulators assess and describe uncertainties regarding treatment outcomes and the benefit-risk balance of newly authorised medicines. We aimed to evaluate the type and number of uncertainties described in the benefit-risk assessment for initial marketing authorisations of oncology medicines assessed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). We also aimed to develop a systematic classification of uncertainties to contribute to improved communication about uncertainties.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We included all medicines containing a new active substance assessed by the EMA and granted an initial marketing authorisation by the European Commission in 2011-2022 for an oncology indication. We extracted characteristics of these oncology medicines and uncertainties described under the benefit-risk balance section of European public assessment reports. Uncertainties were categorised and their frequencies stratified according to time of marketing authorisation, and medicine and regulatory characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 121 oncology medicines were included for which 800 (median 6, range 0-23) uncertainties were identified. Uncertainties were classified into five categories: safety (n = 404, 51%), efficacy (n = 322, 40%), pharmacology (n = 58, 7%), use in clinical practice (n = 10, 1%), and quality (n = 6, 1%). Among 27 subcategories, most uncertainties were related to specific adverse events (n = 156, 20%), effect size (n = 155, 20%), safety in subpopulations (n = 124, 16%), or efficacy in subpopulations (n = 88, 11%). The type of medicine (P = 0.012), type of marketing authorisation (P = 0.001), and year of marketing authorisation (P = 0.007) were associated with the number of uncertainties per medicine, with the highest number observed for cell and gene therapies [8 (3-23)], medicines granted conditional marketing authorisation [7 (3-23)], and medicines authorised in 2019-2022 [7 (2-23)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At the time of initial marketing authorisation of oncology medicines, uncertainties about their benefit-risk balance most often concerned safety aspects, followed by efficacy. The number of uncertainties was highest for cell and gene therapies, conditionally authorised medicines, and medicines authorised in recent years.</p>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"9 12","pages":"103991"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11696770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103991","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Drug regulators assess and describe uncertainties regarding treatment outcomes and the benefit-risk balance of newly authorised medicines. We aimed to evaluate the type and number of uncertainties described in the benefit-risk assessment for initial marketing authorisations of oncology medicines assessed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). We also aimed to develop a systematic classification of uncertainties to contribute to improved communication about uncertainties.

Materials and methods: We included all medicines containing a new active substance assessed by the EMA and granted an initial marketing authorisation by the European Commission in 2011-2022 for an oncology indication. We extracted characteristics of these oncology medicines and uncertainties described under the benefit-risk balance section of European public assessment reports. Uncertainties were categorised and their frequencies stratified according to time of marketing authorisation, and medicine and regulatory characteristics.

Results: In total, 121 oncology medicines were included for which 800 (median 6, range 0-23) uncertainties were identified. Uncertainties were classified into five categories: safety (n = 404, 51%), efficacy (n = 322, 40%), pharmacology (n = 58, 7%), use in clinical practice (n = 10, 1%), and quality (n = 6, 1%). Among 27 subcategories, most uncertainties were related to specific adverse events (n = 156, 20%), effect size (n = 155, 20%), safety in subpopulations (n = 124, 16%), or efficacy in subpopulations (n = 88, 11%). The type of medicine (P = 0.012), type of marketing authorisation (P = 0.001), and year of marketing authorisation (P = 0.007) were associated with the number of uncertainties per medicine, with the highest number observed for cell and gene therapies [8 (3-23)], medicines granted conditional marketing authorisation [7 (3-23)], and medicines authorised in 2019-2022 [7 (2-23)].

Conclusion: At the time of initial marketing authorisation of oncology medicines, uncertainties about their benefit-risk balance most often concerned safety aspects, followed by efficacy. The number of uncertainties was highest for cell and gene therapies, conditionally authorised medicines, and medicines authorised in recent years.

欧洲药品管理局评估的肿瘤药物收益-风险平衡的不确定性。
背景:药品监管机构评估和描述新批准药物治疗结果和收益风险平衡的不确定性。我们的目的是评估欧洲药品管理局(EMA)评估的肿瘤药物首次上市许可的获益-风险评估中描述的不确定性的类型和数量。我们还旨在建立一个系统的不确定性分类,以有助于改善关于不确定性的沟通。材料和方法:我们纳入了所有含有EMA评估的新活性物质的药物,并于2011-2022年获得欧盟委员会肿瘤适应症的初始上市许可。我们提取了这些肿瘤药物的特征和欧洲公共评估报告中利益-风险平衡部分描述的不确定性。对不确定性进行分类,并根据上市许可时间、药物和监管特征对其频率进行分层。结果:共纳入121种肿瘤药物,确定了800种(中位数6,范围0-23)不确定度。不确定性分为5类:安全性(n = 404, 51%)、有效性(n = 322, 40%)、药理学(n = 58, 7%)、临床应用(n = 10, 1%)和质量(n = 6, 1%)。在27个亚类别中,大多数不确定性与特定不良事件(n = 156, 20%)、效应大小(n = 155, 20%)、亚群安全性(n = 124, 16%)或亚群有效性(n = 88, 11%)有关。药物类型(P = 0.012)、上市许可类型(P = 0.001)和上市许可年份(P = 0.007)与每种药物的不确定性数量相关,细胞和基因疗法的不确定性数量最多[8(3-23)],获得有条件上市许可的药物[7(3-23)],以及2019-2022年批准的药物[7(2-23)]。结论:在肿瘤药物首次上市许可时,其收益-风险平衡的不确定性通常涉及安全性方面,其次是有效性。细胞和基因疗法、有条件批准的药物和近年来批准的药物的不确定性数量最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ESMO Open
ESMO Open Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
255
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: ESMO Open is the online-only, open access journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). It is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to sharing high-quality medical research and educational materials from various fields of oncology. The journal specifically focuses on showcasing innovative clinical and translational cancer research. ESMO Open aims to publish a wide range of research articles covering all aspects of oncology, including experimental studies, translational research, diagnostic advancements, and therapeutic approaches. The content of the journal includes original research articles, insightful reviews, thought-provoking editorials, and correspondence. Moreover, the journal warmly welcomes the submission of phase I trials and meta-analyses. It also showcases reviews from significant ESMO conferences and meetings, as well as publishes important position statements on behalf of ESMO. Overall, ESMO Open offers a platform for scientists, clinicians, and researchers in the field of oncology to share their valuable insights and contribute to advancing the understanding and treatment of cancer. The journal serves as a source of up-to-date information and fosters collaboration within the oncology community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信