Lifecycle environmental benefits of integrated rational fertilization, biochar, and constructed wetland in mitigating nutrient loading

IF 5.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Yu-Ning Chen, Chihhao Fan, Michal Šereš, Markéta Šerešová, Jan Vymazal, Shu-Yuan Pan
{"title":"Lifecycle environmental benefits of integrated rational fertilization, biochar, and constructed wetland in mitigating nutrient loading","authors":"Yu-Ning Chen, Chihhao Fan, Michal Šereš, Markéta Šerešová, Jan Vymazal, Shu-Yuan Pan","doi":"10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agricultural activities due to fertilization contribute significantly to nutrient loadings and other environmental burdens, posing a severe threat to ecosystems. Although a portfolio of green agricultural practices is recommended, few studies address the environmental benefits from a life-cycle perspective. This study comprehensively evaluates the cradle-to-gate environmental benefits of integrating rational fertilization, biochar, and constructed wetlands (CWs) exemplified by plum cultivation. Four assessment scenarios were designed: (S1) conventional cultivation, (S2) rational fertilization with biochar amendment, (S3) conventional cultivation with a simulated CWs system, and (S4) rational fertilization with biochar amendment and a simulated CWs system. In the assessment, rational fertilization used half the fertilizer compared to conventional practices, biochar was applied at 0.1 ton/ha, and horizontal subsurface flow CWs were filled with washed gravel and planted with <ce:italic>Phragmites australis</ce:italic>. The findings show that rational fertilization combined with biochar (S2) or CWs (S3) alone show about half the eutrophication impacts of conventional cultivation (S1). Combining rational fertilization, biochar and CWs (S4) further reduces freshwater and marine eutrophication potentials by ∼73.5 % and ∼69.8 %, respectively. Similarly, these green agricultural practices (either S2 or S4) effectively reduce the overall endpoint impacts by about 47 %, with synergistic improvements, particularly in endpoint freshwater ecotoxicity and freshwater eutrophication, observed for S4 (a significant reduction of 76 %) compared to S1. Regarding the carbon footprint, the production of plums using conventional agriculture emits ∼300 kg CO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">2</ce:inf>-eq per ton-plum, whereas using green agricultural practices results in only ∼138 kg CO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">2</ce:inf>-eq per ton-plum, representing a reduction of 45.8 % in greenhouse gas emissions. This study highlights the potential of green agricultural practices to mitigate NPS nutrient loadings to aquifers and achieve sustainable agricultural management through reduced global warming and other environmental impacts.","PeriodicalId":7634,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Water Management","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Water Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109202","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural activities due to fertilization contribute significantly to nutrient loadings and other environmental burdens, posing a severe threat to ecosystems. Although a portfolio of green agricultural practices is recommended, few studies address the environmental benefits from a life-cycle perspective. This study comprehensively evaluates the cradle-to-gate environmental benefits of integrating rational fertilization, biochar, and constructed wetlands (CWs) exemplified by plum cultivation. Four assessment scenarios were designed: (S1) conventional cultivation, (S2) rational fertilization with biochar amendment, (S3) conventional cultivation with a simulated CWs system, and (S4) rational fertilization with biochar amendment and a simulated CWs system. In the assessment, rational fertilization used half the fertilizer compared to conventional practices, biochar was applied at 0.1 ton/ha, and horizontal subsurface flow CWs were filled with washed gravel and planted with Phragmites australis. The findings show that rational fertilization combined with biochar (S2) or CWs (S3) alone show about half the eutrophication impacts of conventional cultivation (S1). Combining rational fertilization, biochar and CWs (S4) further reduces freshwater and marine eutrophication potentials by ∼73.5 % and ∼69.8 %, respectively. Similarly, these green agricultural practices (either S2 or S4) effectively reduce the overall endpoint impacts by about 47 %, with synergistic improvements, particularly in endpoint freshwater ecotoxicity and freshwater eutrophication, observed for S4 (a significant reduction of 76 %) compared to S1. Regarding the carbon footprint, the production of plums using conventional agriculture emits ∼300 kg CO2-eq per ton-plum, whereas using green agricultural practices results in only ∼138 kg CO2-eq per ton-plum, representing a reduction of 45.8 % in greenhouse gas emissions. This study highlights the potential of green agricultural practices to mitigate NPS nutrient loadings to aquifers and achieve sustainable agricultural management through reduced global warming and other environmental impacts.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural Water Management
Agricultural Water Management 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
14.90%
发文量
648
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Water Management publishes papers of international significance relating to the science, economics, and policy of agricultural water management. In all cases, manuscripts must address implications and provide insight regarding agricultural water management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信