How did the RCP get into a mess over physician associates?

The BMJ Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1136/bmj.q2729
Adele Waters
{"title":"How did the RCP get into a mess over physician associates?","authors":"Adele Waters","doi":"10.1136/bmj.q2729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Royal College of Physicians has been at the centre of the UK row over physician associates. Adele Waters explores what happened and where it leaves the college now In March 2024 the Royal College of Physicians was forced to hold an extraordinary general meeting (EGM), only the third in its more than 500 year history.1 The issue that prompted it was physician associates (PAs), specifically their regulation, scope of practice, and expansion across the health service. The meeting was ill tempered and fraught, with participants describing it as “really aggressive” and an “unmitigated disaster.”2 Such was the concern about the meeting’s conduct and the level of hostility in the room that the RCP was forced to admit it had failed its membership and ordered an independent review to establish what had gone wrong.3 That review, carried out by the health think tank the King’s Fund and published in September,2 found a “pervasive lack of trust and confidence” in the RCP’s governance and that its governing council had been operating ineffectively. After the EGM the college saw several high level resignations: its former president Sarah Clarke,4 registrar Cathryn Edwards,5 former deputy registrar Jamie Read,6 and, after the King’s Fund review, the chair of the board of trustees, David Croisdale-Appleby.7 In 2015 the college had established the Faculty of Physician Associates (FPA), in conjunction with Health Education England (as it was then called) and other medical royal colleges (box 1). Several members of the FPA’s board also resigned en masse after the EGM, including its president and vice president.8 The FPA will close at the end of this year, although the RCP will continue to oversee the annual PA exam. Box 1 ### Timeline—RCP and PAsRETURN TO TEXT","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Royal College of Physicians has been at the centre of the UK row over physician associates. Adele Waters explores what happened and where it leaves the college now In March 2024 the Royal College of Physicians was forced to hold an extraordinary general meeting (EGM), only the third in its more than 500 year history.1 The issue that prompted it was physician associates (PAs), specifically their regulation, scope of practice, and expansion across the health service. The meeting was ill tempered and fraught, with participants describing it as “really aggressive” and an “unmitigated disaster.”2 Such was the concern about the meeting’s conduct and the level of hostility in the room that the RCP was forced to admit it had failed its membership and ordered an independent review to establish what had gone wrong.3 That review, carried out by the health think tank the King’s Fund and published in September,2 found a “pervasive lack of trust and confidence” in the RCP’s governance and that its governing council had been operating ineffectively. After the EGM the college saw several high level resignations: its former president Sarah Clarke,4 registrar Cathryn Edwards,5 former deputy registrar Jamie Read,6 and, after the King’s Fund review, the chair of the board of trustees, David Croisdale-Appleby.7 In 2015 the college had established the Faculty of Physician Associates (FPA), in conjunction with Health Education England (as it was then called) and other medical royal colleges (box 1). Several members of the FPA’s board also resigned en masse after the EGM, including its president and vice president.8 The FPA will close at the end of this year, although the RCP will continue to oversee the annual PA exam. Box 1 ### Timeline—RCP and PAsRETURN TO TEXT
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信