Understanding NCLEX-RN Repeat Writers' Learning Needs: A Pilot Developmental Design Research Study.

Marnie Kramer
{"title":"Understanding NCLEX-RN Repeat Writers' Learning Needs: A Pilot Developmental Design Research Study.","authors":"Marnie Kramer","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20240724-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Graduates who fail the National Council Licensing Examination for Registered Nurses (NCLEX-RN) require evidence-informed educational support.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This educational development study tested an online program created by a nurse educator and researcher for Canadian-educated nursing students (<i>n</i> = 19) who were taking the NCLEX-RN for the second time. Data collected were biweekly virtual meetings with detailed field notes, program completion data, and self-reported NCLEX-RN results. Formative evaluation of the online program was completed after each of the three research cycles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten students passed and two students failed the next examination, five students were lost to follow-up, and two students withdrew from the study. Participants had challenges completing the online program. Two types of repeat writers emerged and included students who had an under or over attention to their studying during remediation. Given these findings, specific education design principles are suggested for repeat NCLEX-RN test takers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Students who take the NCLEX-RN a second time require combined cognitive and affective learning supports to combat the stress of failing. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2024;63(X):XXX-XXX.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94241,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of nursing education","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of nursing education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20240724-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Graduates who fail the National Council Licensing Examination for Registered Nurses (NCLEX-RN) require evidence-informed educational support.

Method: This educational development study tested an online program created by a nurse educator and researcher for Canadian-educated nursing students (n = 19) who were taking the NCLEX-RN for the second time. Data collected were biweekly virtual meetings with detailed field notes, program completion data, and self-reported NCLEX-RN results. Formative evaluation of the online program was completed after each of the three research cycles.

Results: Ten students passed and two students failed the next examination, five students were lost to follow-up, and two students withdrew from the study. Participants had challenges completing the online program. Two types of repeat writers emerged and included students who had an under or over attention to their studying during remediation. Given these findings, specific education design principles are suggested for repeat NCLEX-RN test takers.

Conclusion: Students who take the NCLEX-RN a second time require combined cognitive and affective learning supports to combat the stress of failing. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(X):XXX-XXX.].

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信