Knee proprioception four months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Impact of limb dominance, anterolateral procedure, and association with readiness to return to sport

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Joffrey Drigny , Marine Rolland , Marion Remilly , Henri Guermont , Emmanuel Reboursière , Christophe Hulet , Antoine Gauthier
{"title":"Knee proprioception four months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Impact of limb dominance, anterolateral procedure, and association with readiness to return to sport","authors":"Joffrey Drigny ,&nbsp;Marine Rolland ,&nbsp;Marion Remilly ,&nbsp;Henri Guermont ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Reboursière ,&nbsp;Christophe Hulet ,&nbsp;Antoine Gauthier","doi":"10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Knee proprioception may be compromised after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but associated factors and impact remain unclear. This study evaluated knee proprioception 4 months after primary ACLR, compared with healthy controls, and explored the impacts of leg dominance, anterolateral procedures (AEAPs), and their association with psychological readiness to return to sports.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective cohort study included 30 ACLR participants and 20 healthy controls. Isokinetic testing measured knee strength and proprioception, using passive joint position sense (JPS1: detection, JPS2: repositioning) and kinesthesia (threshold to detection of passive motion). At 8 months, ACLR participants completed the ACL-RSI scale to assess psychological readiness to return to sports.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At 4 months postoperative, kinesthesia was better in the operated limb than the non-operated limb (p = 0.008), but position sense did not differ significantly. There were no significant differences in kinesthesia or position sense between ACLR participants and controls. The operated limb had worse JPS2 if the ACLR was on the non-dominant side. Proprioception was unaffected by AEAPs, and only repositioning showed a moderate, non-significant correlation with ACL-RSI (r = −0.377).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>At 4 months post-ACLR, kinesthesia improved in the operated leg; dominance influenced position sense, highlighting the need for personalized rehabilitation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49698,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy in Sport","volume":"71 ","pages":"Pages 61-68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy in Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X2400124X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Knee proprioception may be compromised after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but associated factors and impact remain unclear. This study evaluated knee proprioception 4 months after primary ACLR, compared with healthy controls, and explored the impacts of leg dominance, anterolateral procedures (AEAPs), and their association with psychological readiness to return to sports.

Methods

This prospective cohort study included 30 ACLR participants and 20 healthy controls. Isokinetic testing measured knee strength and proprioception, using passive joint position sense (JPS1: detection, JPS2: repositioning) and kinesthesia (threshold to detection of passive motion). At 8 months, ACLR participants completed the ACL-RSI scale to assess psychological readiness to return to sports.

Results

At 4 months postoperative, kinesthesia was better in the operated limb than the non-operated limb (p = 0.008), but position sense did not differ significantly. There were no significant differences in kinesthesia or position sense between ACLR participants and controls. The operated limb had worse JPS2 if the ACLR was on the non-dominant side. Proprioception was unaffected by AEAPs, and only repositioning showed a moderate, non-significant correlation with ACL-RSI (r = −0.377).

Conclusion

At 4 months post-ACLR, kinesthesia improved in the operated leg; dominance influenced position sense, highlighting the need for personalized rehabilitation.
前交叉韧带重建后4个月的膝关节本体感觉:肢体优势的影响,前外侧手术,以及与准备恢复运动的关系。
背景:前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后,膝关节本体感觉可能受损,但相关因素和影响尚不清楚。本研究评估了原发性ACLR术后4个月的膝关节本体感觉,并与健康对照组进行了比较,探讨了腿优势、前外侧手术(AEAPs)的影响及其与重返运动心理准备的关系。方法:本前瞻性队列研究包括30名ACLR参与者和20名健康对照。等速测试使用被动关节位置感(JPS1:检测,JPS2:重新定位)和动觉(检测被动运动的阈值)测量膝关节力量和本体感觉。在8个月时,ACLR参与者完成了ACL-RSI量表,以评估重返运动的心理准备。结果:术后4个月,手术肢体的运动感觉优于非手术肢体(p = 0.008),但位置感觉差异无统计学意义。在ACLR参与者和对照组之间,运动感觉和位置感觉没有显著差异。如果ACLR位于非优势侧,则手术肢体的JPS2较差。本体感觉不受AEAPs的影响,只有重新定位与ACL-RSI有中度的、不显著的相关性(r = -0.377)。结论:aclr术后4个月,手术下肢运动感觉改善;优势影响位置感,突出个性化康复的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physical Therapy in Sport
Physical Therapy in Sport 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
125
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy in Sport is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for the publication of research and clinical practice material relevant to the healthcare professions involved in sports and exercise medicine, and rehabilitation. The journal publishes material that is indispensable for day-to-day practice and continuing professional development. Physical Therapy in Sport covers topics dealing with the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of injuries, as well as more general areas of sports and exercise medicine and related sports science. The journal publishes original research, case studies, reviews, masterclasses, papers on clinical approaches, and book reviews, as well as occasional reports from conferences. Papers are double-blind peer-reviewed by our international advisory board and other international experts, and submissions from a broad range of disciplines are actively encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信