Comparison of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Using the Made-in-Japan Robotic System Hinotori Versus Da Vinci: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Hiroki Tsujioka, Kiyoshi Setoguchi, Asumi Nirazuka, Kintaro Hasegawa, Keita Izumi, Akinori Nakayama, Kazutaka Saito
{"title":"Comparison of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Using the Made-in-Japan Robotic System Hinotori Versus Da Vinci: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis","authors":"Hiroki Tsujioka,&nbsp;Kiyoshi Setoguchi,&nbsp;Asumi Nirazuka,&nbsp;Kintaro Hasegawa,&nbsp;Keita Izumi,&nbsp;Akinori Nakayama,&nbsp;Kazutaka Saito","doi":"10.1002/rcs.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>We compared the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using hinotori with those of patients who underwent RARP using da Vinci Xi through propensity score matching to evaluate the potential benefits and efficacy of hinotori.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Perioperative data of patients who underwent RARP between 2017 and 2023 were retrospectively evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>After adjusting for preoperative risk factors, each group comprised 118 propensity score-matched patients. Both median total operative time and median console time were significantly longer in the hinotori group (median differences, 26 and 23 min, respectively). Although the hinotori group had lower estimated blood loss, no significant differences were noted between the groups in postoperative complications, positive surgical margin rates, 12-month biochemical recurrence rates, and urinary continence recovery rates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Although RARP requires more time with hinotori, our study demonstrated that RARP can be performed safely and effectively immediately after the installation of hinotori.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50311,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery","volume":"20 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rcs.70013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

We compared the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using hinotori with those of patients who underwent RARP using da Vinci Xi through propensity score matching to evaluate the potential benefits and efficacy of hinotori.

Methods

Perioperative data of patients who underwent RARP between 2017 and 2023 were retrospectively evaluated.

Results

After adjusting for preoperative risk factors, each group comprised 118 propensity score-matched patients. Both median total operative time and median console time were significantly longer in the hinotori group (median differences, 26 and 23 min, respectively). Although the hinotori group had lower estimated blood loss, no significant differences were noted between the groups in postoperative complications, positive surgical margin rates, 12-month biochemical recurrence rates, and urinary continence recovery rates.

Conclusions

Although RARP requires more time with hinotori, our study demonstrated that RARP can be performed safely and effectively immediately after the installation of hinotori.

使用日本制造机器人系统Hinotori和达芬奇的机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
背景:我们通过倾向评分匹配来比较使用hinotori进行机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)的患者和使用da Vinci Xi进行RARP的患者的手术结果,以评估hinotori的潜在益处和疗效。方法:回顾性分析2017 - 2023年RARP患者围手术期资料。结果:在调整术前危险因素后,每组有118例倾向评分匹配的患者。hinotori组的中位总手术时间和中位坐位时间均明显延长(中位差异分别为26分钟和23分钟)。尽管hinotori组的估计失血量较低,但两组在术后并发症、手术边缘阳性率、12个月生化复发率和尿失禁恢复率方面没有显著差异。结论:虽然RARP需要更多的时间,但我们的研究表明,RARP可以在安装日鸟后立即进行安全有效的RARP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery provides a cross-disciplinary platform for presenting the latest developments in robotics and computer assisted technologies for medical applications. The journal publishes cutting-edge papers and expert reviews, complemented by commentaries, correspondence and conference highlights that stimulate discussion and exchange of ideas. Areas of interest include robotic surgery aids and systems, operative planning tools, medical imaging and visualisation, simulation and navigation, virtual reality, intuitive command and control systems, haptics and sensor technologies. In addition to research and surgical planning studies, the journal welcomes papers detailing clinical trials and applications of computer-assisted workflows and robotic systems in neurosurgery, urology, paediatric, orthopaedic, craniofacial, cardiovascular, thoraco-abdominal, musculoskeletal and visceral surgery. Articles providing critical analysis of clinical trials, assessment of the benefits and risks of the application of these technologies, commenting on ease of use, or addressing surgical education and training issues are also encouraged. The journal aims to foster a community that encompasses medical practitioners, researchers, and engineers and computer scientists developing robotic systems and computational tools in academic and commercial environments, with the intention of promoting and developing these exciting areas of medical technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信