Comparison of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Using the Made-in-Japan Robotic System Hinotori Versus Da Vinci: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
{"title":"Comparison of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Using the Made-in-Japan Robotic System Hinotori Versus Da Vinci: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis","authors":"Hiroki Tsujioka, Kiyoshi Setoguchi, Asumi Nirazuka, Kintaro Hasegawa, Keita Izumi, Akinori Nakayama, Kazutaka Saito","doi":"10.1002/rcs.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>We compared the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using hinotori with those of patients who underwent RARP using da Vinci Xi through propensity score matching to evaluate the potential benefits and efficacy of hinotori.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Perioperative data of patients who underwent RARP between 2017 and 2023 were retrospectively evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>After adjusting for preoperative risk factors, each group comprised 118 propensity score-matched patients. Both median total operative time and median console time were significantly longer in the hinotori group (median differences, 26 and 23 min, respectively). Although the hinotori group had lower estimated blood loss, no significant differences were noted between the groups in postoperative complications, positive surgical margin rates, 12-month biochemical recurrence rates, and urinary continence recovery rates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Although RARP requires more time with hinotori, our study demonstrated that RARP can be performed safely and effectively immediately after the installation of hinotori.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50311,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery","volume":"20 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rcs.70013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
We compared the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using hinotori with those of patients who underwent RARP using da Vinci Xi through propensity score matching to evaluate the potential benefits and efficacy of hinotori.
Methods
Perioperative data of patients who underwent RARP between 2017 and 2023 were retrospectively evaluated.
Results
After adjusting for preoperative risk factors, each group comprised 118 propensity score-matched patients. Both median total operative time and median console time were significantly longer in the hinotori group (median differences, 26 and 23 min, respectively). Although the hinotori group had lower estimated blood loss, no significant differences were noted between the groups in postoperative complications, positive surgical margin rates, 12-month biochemical recurrence rates, and urinary continence recovery rates.
Conclusions
Although RARP requires more time with hinotori, our study demonstrated that RARP can be performed safely and effectively immediately after the installation of hinotori.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery provides a cross-disciplinary platform for presenting the latest developments in robotics and computer assisted technologies for medical applications. The journal publishes cutting-edge papers and expert reviews, complemented by commentaries, correspondence and conference highlights that stimulate discussion and exchange of ideas. Areas of interest include robotic surgery aids and systems, operative planning tools, medical imaging and visualisation, simulation and navigation, virtual reality, intuitive command and control systems, haptics and sensor technologies. In addition to research and surgical planning studies, the journal welcomes papers detailing clinical trials and applications of computer-assisted workflows and robotic systems in neurosurgery, urology, paediatric, orthopaedic, craniofacial, cardiovascular, thoraco-abdominal, musculoskeletal and visceral surgery. Articles providing critical analysis of clinical trials, assessment of the benefits and risks of the application of these technologies, commenting on ease of use, or addressing surgical education and training issues are also encouraged. The journal aims to foster a community that encompasses medical practitioners, researchers, and engineers and computer scientists developing robotic systems and computational tools in academic and commercial environments, with the intention of promoting and developing these exciting areas of medical technology.