Cannabis combined with oxycodone for pain relief in fibromyalgia pain: a randomized clinical self-titration trial with focus on adverse events.

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2024-11-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpain.2024.1497111
Cornelis Jan van Dam, Cornelis Kramers, Arnt Schellekens, Marcel Bouvy, Eveline van Dorp, Mikael A Kowal, Erik Olofsen, Albert Dahan, Marieke Niesters, Monique van Velzen
{"title":"Cannabis combined with oxycodone for pain relief in fibromyalgia pain: a randomized clinical self-titration trial with focus on adverse events.","authors":"Cornelis Jan van Dam, Cornelis Kramers, Arnt Schellekens, Marcel Bouvy, Eveline van Dorp, Mikael A Kowal, Erik Olofsen, Albert Dahan, Marieke Niesters, Monique van Velzen","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2024.1497111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We determined whether adding cannabis to oxycodone for chronic non-cancer pain management could reduce treatment-related adverse effects (AEs) while maintaining effective analgesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this open-label study, fibromyalgia patients aged ≥18 years were randomized to receive 5 mg oxycodone tablets (max. four times/day), 150 mg of inhaled cannabis containing 6.3% Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol and 8% cannabidiol (max. times inhalation sessions/day), or a combination of both for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was treatment-related adverse events, assessed using a 10-point composite adverse event (cAE) score; additionally, we recorded daily reported pain relief and daily tablet and cannabis consumption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 23 patients were treated with oxycodone, 29 with cannabis, and 29 with the oxycodone/cannabis combination. Three patients from the oxycodone group (13%) and 18 patients from the cannabis groups (31%, 9 in each group) withdrew from the trial within 2-3 weeks because of the severity of AEs. There were no differences in treatment-related cAE scores among the three groups that completed the study (<i>p</i> = 0.70). The analgesic responder rate showed a ≥1- point reduction in pain in 50% and a ≥2-point reduction in 20% of patients, while 50% of patients experienced no treatment benefit. The combination treatment reduced oxycodone tablet consumption by 35% (<i>p</i> = 0.02), but it did not affect the number of cannabis inhalation sessions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cannabis combined with oxycodone offered no advantage over either treatment alone, except for a reduction in opioid tablet intake; however, the overall drug load was the highest in the combination group. Moreover, cannabis was poorly tolerated and led to treatment discontinuation in one-third of participants treated with cannabis.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered at the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (trialsearch.who.int) on July 26, 2019, identifier NL7902.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"5 ","pages":"1497111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11625723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2024.1497111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We determined whether adding cannabis to oxycodone for chronic non-cancer pain management could reduce treatment-related adverse effects (AEs) while maintaining effective analgesia.

Methods: In this open-label study, fibromyalgia patients aged ≥18 years were randomized to receive 5 mg oxycodone tablets (max. four times/day), 150 mg of inhaled cannabis containing 6.3% Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and 8% cannabidiol (max. times inhalation sessions/day), or a combination of both for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was treatment-related adverse events, assessed using a 10-point composite adverse event (cAE) score; additionally, we recorded daily reported pain relief and daily tablet and cannabis consumption.

Results: In total, 23 patients were treated with oxycodone, 29 with cannabis, and 29 with the oxycodone/cannabis combination. Three patients from the oxycodone group (13%) and 18 patients from the cannabis groups (31%, 9 in each group) withdrew from the trial within 2-3 weeks because of the severity of AEs. There were no differences in treatment-related cAE scores among the three groups that completed the study (p = 0.70). The analgesic responder rate showed a ≥1- point reduction in pain in 50% and a ≥2-point reduction in 20% of patients, while 50% of patients experienced no treatment benefit. The combination treatment reduced oxycodone tablet consumption by 35% (p = 0.02), but it did not affect the number of cannabis inhalation sessions.

Conclusions: Cannabis combined with oxycodone offered no advantage over either treatment alone, except for a reduction in opioid tablet intake; however, the overall drug load was the highest in the combination group. Moreover, cannabis was poorly tolerated and led to treatment discontinuation in one-third of participants treated with cannabis.

Clinical trial registration: The trial was registered at the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (trialsearch.who.int) on July 26, 2019, identifier NL7902.

大麻联合羟考酮缓解纤维肌痛疼痛:一项随机临床自我滴定试验,重点关注不良事件。
目的:我们确定将大麻加入羟考酮治疗慢性非癌性疼痛是否可以在保持有效镇痛的同时减少治疗相关不良反应(ae)。方法:在这项开放标签研究中,年龄≥18岁的纤维肌痛患者随机接受5mg羟考酮片(最大剂量为5mg)。每天四次),吸入大麻150毫克,含6.3% Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol和8%大麻二酚(最大。吸入次数/天),或两者联合使用,持续6周。主要终点是治疗相关不良事件,使用10分综合不良事件(cAE)评分进行评估;此外,我们记录了每日报告的疼痛缓解和每日药片和大麻的消费量。结果:羟考酮治疗23例,大麻治疗29例,羟考酮/大麻联合治疗29例。羟考酮组的3名患者(13%)和大麻组的18名患者(31%,每组9名)因不良事件严重程度在2-3周内退出试验。完成研究的三组患者治疗相关cAE评分无差异(p = 0.70)。镇痛反应率显示50%的患者疼痛减轻≥1点,20%的患者疼痛减轻≥2点,而50%的患者没有治疗获益。联合治疗使羟考酮片的消耗量减少了35% (p = 0.02),但对大麻吸入次数没有影响。结论:大麻联合羟考酮除了减少阿片类药物的摄入量外,与单独治疗相比没有任何优势;然而,联合用药组的总药量最高。此外,大麻的耐受性很差,导致三分之一接受大麻治疗的参与者停止治疗。临床试验注册:该试验于2019年7月26日在世卫组织国际临床试验注册平台(trialsearch.who.int)注册,编号为NL7902。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信