Rethinking the Pace of Productivity in Pharmacy Academia

IF 3.8 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Kathryn J. Smith , Jeff Cain , Lindsey M. Childs-Kean
{"title":"Rethinking the Pace of Productivity in Pharmacy Academia","authors":"Kathryn J. Smith ,&nbsp;Jeff Cain ,&nbsp;Lindsey M. Childs-Kean","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In response to rising levels of burnout and stress among pharmacy faculty, there is a growing call to reassess traditional approaches to productivity and well-being within the Academy. We introduce a “slower” approach to faculty work, one that advocates for a deliberate focus on quality over quantity and promoting sustainable practices that prioritize meaningful contributions and personal well-being. The aim of this commentary is to encourage pharmacy faculty to embrace a slow mindset while maintaining the ability to contribute meaningfully to the lives of their students, patients, colleagues, and the profession of pharmacy. Drawing from Cal Newport’s book, <em>Slow Productivity</em>, principles of obsessing over quality, doing fewer things, and working at a natural pace are explained. Practical strategies are discussed, including reevaluating workload distribution, setting realistic project limits, and embracing seasonal variations in academic demands. These approaches aim to foster a supportive and balanced organizational culture within pharmacy academia, aligning individual aspirations with institutional goals. This commentary encourages pharmacy faculty to embrace a slower, more intentional approach to their work, promoting personal and professional fulfillment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"89 1","pages":"Article 101338"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945924110571","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In response to rising levels of burnout and stress among pharmacy faculty, there is a growing call to reassess traditional approaches to productivity and well-being within the Academy. We introduce a “slower” approach to faculty work, one that advocates for a deliberate focus on quality over quantity and promoting sustainable practices that prioritize meaningful contributions and personal well-being. The aim of this commentary is to encourage pharmacy faculty to embrace a slow mindset while maintaining the ability to contribute meaningfully to the lives of their students, patients, colleagues, and the profession of pharmacy. Drawing from Cal Newport’s book, Slow Productivity, principles of obsessing over quality, doing fewer things, and working at a natural pace are explained. Practical strategies are discussed, including reevaluating workload distribution, setting realistic project limits, and embracing seasonal variations in academic demands. These approaches aim to foster a supportive and balanced organizational culture within pharmacy academia, aligning individual aspirations with institutional goals. This commentary encourages pharmacy faculty to embrace a slower, more intentional approach to their work, promoting personal and professional fulfillment.
重新思考药学学术界生产力的步伐。
为了应对药学院不断上升的职业倦怠和压力水平,越来越多的人呼吁重新评估学院内提高生产力和幸福感的传统方法。我们在教师工作中引入了一种“慢”的方法,提倡有意识地关注质量而不是数量,促进优先考虑有意义的贡献和个人福祉的可持续实践。这篇评论的目的是鼓励药学教师接受一种缓慢的心态,同时保持对学生、病人、同事和药学专业的生活做出有意义贡献的能力。从Cal Newport的书《缓慢的生产力》中,解释了痴迷于质量、做更少的事情和以自然的速度工作的原则。讨论了实际的策略,包括重新评估工作量分配,设定现实的项目限制,以及接受学术需求的季节性变化。这些方法的目的是在药学学术界培养一种支持性和平衡的组织文化,使个人愿望与机构目标保持一致。这篇评论鼓励药学教师采用一种更缓慢、更有意识的方法来完成他们的工作,促进个人和职业的实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信