Combination of Manual Therapy and Dry Needling Effectively Improves Acute Neck Pain and Muscular Tone and Stiffness in Combat Sports Athletes: A Randomized Controlled Study.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Adrian Kużdzał, Filipe Manuel Clemente, Sebastian Klich, Adam Kawczyński, Robert Trybulski
{"title":"Combination of Manual Therapy and Dry Needling Effectively Improves Acute Neck Pain and Muscular Tone and Stiffness in Combat Sports Athletes: A Randomized Controlled Study.","authors":"Adrian Kużdzał, Filipe Manuel Clemente, Sebastian Klich, Adam Kawczyński, Robert Trybulski","doi":"10.52082/jssm.2024.852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare the effects of manual therapy combined with dry needling (MTDN) to a control group, focusing on the impact on pressure pain threshold (PPT), muscle tone (MT), muscle stiffness (MS), muscle strength, and range of motion in the neck muscles of adult combat sports athletes. A randomized controlled study design was employed, with one group of athletes (n = 15) receiving MTDN intervention, while the other group (n = 15) underwent a control treatment (CG) involving a quasi-needle technique combined with manual therapy. Both groups participated in three sessions, either in the MTDN intervention or the control condition. All athletes, who were experiencing neck pain, were evaluated at rest, after one session, after three sessions, and again 72 hours after the third session. Muscle tone (MT) and muscle stiffness (MS) were measured using myotonometry, pressure pain threshold (PPT) was assessed with an algesiometer, muscle strength was evaluated using a handheld dynamometer, and range of motion was measured with an electronic goniometer. Group comparisons revealed significantly higher MT in CG compared to MTDN after the 3rd session (<i>p</i> < 0.001; <i>d</i> = 1.50). Additionally, CG showed significantly greater MS than MTDN after the 3rd session (<i>p</i> < 0.001; <i>d</i> = 1.75) and at 72 hours post-session (<i>p</i> < 0.001; <i>d</i> = 2.45). Conversely, MTDN exhibited significantly greater PPT than CG at 72 hours post-session (<i>p</i> < 0.001; <i>d</i> = 1.80). Our results suggest that MTDN is significantly more effective in improving muscle tone, stiffness, and acute pain compared to manual therapy alone. However, no significant impact was observed on maximal strength or neck range of motion. A combined approach may offer benefits by more rapidly reducing neck pain and better preparing muscle properties for future activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":54765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","volume":"23 4","pages":"852-862"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622045/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2024.852","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the effects of manual therapy combined with dry needling (MTDN) to a control group, focusing on the impact on pressure pain threshold (PPT), muscle tone (MT), muscle stiffness (MS), muscle strength, and range of motion in the neck muscles of adult combat sports athletes. A randomized controlled study design was employed, with one group of athletes (n = 15) receiving MTDN intervention, while the other group (n = 15) underwent a control treatment (CG) involving a quasi-needle technique combined with manual therapy. Both groups participated in three sessions, either in the MTDN intervention or the control condition. All athletes, who were experiencing neck pain, were evaluated at rest, after one session, after three sessions, and again 72 hours after the third session. Muscle tone (MT) and muscle stiffness (MS) were measured using myotonometry, pressure pain threshold (PPT) was assessed with an algesiometer, muscle strength was evaluated using a handheld dynamometer, and range of motion was measured with an electronic goniometer. Group comparisons revealed significantly higher MT in CG compared to MTDN after the 3rd session (p < 0.001; d = 1.50). Additionally, CG showed significantly greater MS than MTDN after the 3rd session (p < 0.001; d = 1.75) and at 72 hours post-session (p < 0.001; d = 2.45). Conversely, MTDN exhibited significantly greater PPT than CG at 72 hours post-session (p < 0.001; d = 1.80). Our results suggest that MTDN is significantly more effective in improving muscle tone, stiffness, and acute pain compared to manual therapy alone. However, no significant impact was observed on maximal strength or neck range of motion. A combined approach may offer benefits by more rapidly reducing neck pain and better preparing muscle properties for future activities.

手工疗法和干针的结合有效地改善急性颈部疼痛和肌肉张力和僵硬的战斗运动运动员:一项随机对照研究。
本研究旨在比较手工疗法联合干针(MTDN)与对照组的效果,重点研究对成人搏击运动运动员颈部肌肉压力痛阈值(PPT)、肌张力(MT)、肌肉僵硬度(MS)、肌肉力量和运动范围的影响。采用随机对照研究设计,其中一组运动员(n = 15)接受MTDN干预,而另一组(n = 15)接受包括准针技术结合手工治疗的对照治疗(CG)。两组都参加了三次会议,无论是在MTDN干预或控制条件下。所有经历颈部疼痛的运动员在休息时、一次训练后、三次训练后和第三次训练后72小时再次接受评估。采用肌张力计测量肌张力(MT)和肌肉僵硬度(MS),用疼痛计评估压痛阈值(PPT),用手持式测力仪评估肌肉力量,用电子测角仪测量运动范围。组间比较显示,与MTDN相比,第3次治疗后CG MT显著升高(p < 0.001;D = 1.50)。此外,CG在第3次治疗后显示MS显著高于MTDN (p < 0.001;D = 1.75)和术后72小时(p < 0.001;D = 2.45)。相反,MTDN在治疗后72小时的PPT表现明显高于CG (p < 0.001;D = 1.80)。我们的研究结果表明,与单独的手工治疗相比,MTDN在改善肌肉张力、僵硬和急性疼痛方面显着更有效。然而,没有观察到对最大力量或颈部活动范围的显著影响。综合方法可以更快地减轻颈部疼痛,更好地为未来的活动准备肌肉特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (JSSM) is a non-profit making scientific electronic journal, publishing research and review articles, together with case studies, in the fields of sports medicine and the exercise sciences. JSSM is published quarterly in March, June, September and December. JSSM also publishes editorials, a "letter to the editor" section, abstracts from international and national congresses, panel meetings, conferences and symposia, and can function as an open discussion forum on significant issues of current interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信