Human-Centered Design in Graduate Nursing Education: Outcomes From a Cohort Study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Nurse Educator Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1097/NNE.0000000000001778
Jeana M Holt, AkkeNeel Talsma, Jan Irene C Lloren, Imteyaz Eljarrah, Lynne Woehrle, Ilya Avdeev
{"title":"Human-Centered Design in Graduate Nursing Education: Outcomes From a Cohort Study.","authors":"Jeana M Holt, AkkeNeel Talsma, Jan Irene C Lloren, Imteyaz Eljarrah, Lynne Woehrle, Ilya Avdeev","doi":"10.1097/NNE.0000000000001778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many nursing curricula lack human-centered design (HCD) learning opportunities, and minimal evidence exists about HCD educational outcomes.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study explored the effects of HCD experiential learning activities on graduate nursing students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The quasi-experimental mixed-method design employed an explanatory approach. Pre- and posttest surveys were administered during an HCD workshop. Descriptive and inferential statistics assessed gains in the measures. Qualitative data were collected once, post-intervention, and analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four students provided complete responses. A linear mixed-effects regression model indicated statistically significant gains in creative self-efficacy, psychological empowerment, and traits of design thinkers. Qualitative themes contextualized the quantitative findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results indicated that HCD experiential learning influenced the study's constructs. These results set the stage for multi-site studies investigating the long-term outcomes of HCD interventions in nursing curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":54706,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Educator","volume":" ","pages":"E68-E74"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11850013/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Educator","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001778","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many nursing curricula lack human-centered design (HCD) learning opportunities, and minimal evidence exists about HCD educational outcomes.

Purpose: The study explored the effects of HCD experiential learning activities on graduate nursing students.

Methods: The quasi-experimental mixed-method design employed an explanatory approach. Pre- and posttest surveys were administered during an HCD workshop. Descriptive and inferential statistics assessed gains in the measures. Qualitative data were collected once, post-intervention, and analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Sixty-four students provided complete responses. A linear mixed-effects regression model indicated statistically significant gains in creative self-efficacy, psychological empowerment, and traits of design thinkers. Qualitative themes contextualized the quantitative findings.

Conclusions: The results indicated that HCD experiential learning influenced the study's constructs. These results set the stage for multi-site studies investigating the long-term outcomes of HCD interventions in nursing curricula.

护理研究生教育中以人为本的设计:一项队列研究的结果。
背景:许多护理课程缺乏以人为本设计(HCD)的学习机会,关于HCD教育成果的证据也很少。目的:探讨HCD体验式学习活动对护理研究生的影响。方法:准实验混合法设计采用解释法。在HCD研讨会期间进行了测试前和测试后的调查。描述性和推断性统计评估了这些措施的收益。定性数据收集一次,干预后,并使用专题分析进行分析。结果:64名学生提供了完整的回答。线性混合效应回归模型显示,设计思考者在创意自我效能、心理赋权和特质方面有统计学上的显著提高。定性主题将定量结果置于背景中。结论:HCD体验式学习对研究构念有影响。这些结果为调查护理课程中HCD干预的长期结果的多地点研究奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nurse Educator
Nurse Educator 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nurse Educator, a scholarly, peer reviewed journal for faculty and administrators in schools of nursing and nurse educators in other settings, provides practical information and research related to nursing education. Topics include program, curriculum, course, and faculty development; teaching and learning in nursing; technology in nursing education; simulation; clinical teaching and evaluation; testing and measurement; trends and issues; and research in nursing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信