Noha A. Mourad , Marina Gálvez-Peralta , Christopher B. Brown , Ahmad Hanif , Amy-Joan L. Ham
{"title":"A Call for Clarity: A Proposed Toolkit to Integrate Foundational Sciences into Pharmacy Curricula","authors":"Noha A. Mourad , Marina Gálvez-Peralta , Christopher B. Brown , Ahmad Hanif , Amy-Joan L. Ham","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) Pharmacotherapy Didactic Curriculum Toolkit has been used across many schools of pharmacy to guide the depth and breadth of therapeutics coverage, but no counterpart for foundational science coverage in pharmacy education currently exists. Broad topic areas for the foundational sciences are outlined in Appendix 1 of the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) standards, but the standards lack specific direction with regard to foundational sciences content needed in the professional pharmacy curriculum. Faculty are therefore challenged to determine the depth and breadth of foundational sciences to meet educational standards within limited curricular space, often resulting in curricular hoarding and overload. Another challenge is how faculty should best integrate the foundational sciences with clinical practice in accordance with ACPE expectations. This narrative review serves as an urgent call to develop a Comprehensive Foundational Sciences Toolkit and provides an example of a toolkit mapped to pharmacy educational standards and competencies. The authors discuss the potential of this foundational sciences toolkit to 1) guide faculty on the appropriate coverage of foundational sciences within the professional pharmacy curriculum to limit curricular overload; and 2) enhance communication and coordination between faculty to facilitate the process of streamlining, connecting, and aligning content across the foundational and clinical sciences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"89 1","pages":"Article 101340"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945924110595","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) Pharmacotherapy Didactic Curriculum Toolkit has been used across many schools of pharmacy to guide the depth and breadth of therapeutics coverage, but no counterpart for foundational science coverage in pharmacy education currently exists. Broad topic areas for the foundational sciences are outlined in Appendix 1 of the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) standards, but the standards lack specific direction with regard to foundational sciences content needed in the professional pharmacy curriculum. Faculty are therefore challenged to determine the depth and breadth of foundational sciences to meet educational standards within limited curricular space, often resulting in curricular hoarding and overload. Another challenge is how faculty should best integrate the foundational sciences with clinical practice in accordance with ACPE expectations. This narrative review serves as an urgent call to develop a Comprehensive Foundational Sciences Toolkit and provides an example of a toolkit mapped to pharmacy educational standards and competencies. The authors discuss the potential of this foundational sciences toolkit to 1) guide faculty on the appropriate coverage of foundational sciences within the professional pharmacy curriculum to limit curricular overload; and 2) enhance communication and coordination between faculty to facilitate the process of streamlining, connecting, and aligning content across the foundational and clinical sciences.
期刊介绍:
The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors.
After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.