Does across-trial target behavior influence representational momentum?

IF 1.6 4区心理学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY

Perception Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1177/03010066241299706

Susan E Ruppel, Timothy L Hubbard

{"title":"Does across-trial target behavior influence representational momentum?","authors":"Susan E Ruppel, Timothy L Hubbard","doi":"10.1177/03010066241299706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Whether behaviors of targets presented on other trials could influence representational momentum of a current target was examined. In Experiment 1, each participant received a stimulus set in which (a) 80% of trials presented a moving target and 20% of trials presented a stationary target or (b) 20% of trials presented a moving target and 80% of trials presented a stationary target. In Experiment 2, each participant received a stimulus set in which (a) 80% of trials presented rightward motion and 20% of trials presented leftward motion, (b) 50% of trials presented rightward motion and 50% of trials presented leftward motion, or (c) 20% of trials presented rightward motion and 80% of trials presented leftward motion. Representational momentum of a moving target was not influenced by whether the majority of other trials in the stimulus set presented a stationary target, motion in the same direction, or motion in the opposite direction. The results suggest that behavior of targets on other trials was not effective in creating expectations that influenced representational momentum of the current target. Implications for theories of representational momentum are noted.</p>","PeriodicalId":49708,"journal":{"name":"Perception","volume":" ","pages":"32-43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perception","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066241299706","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whether behaviors of targets presented on other trials could influence representational momentum of a current target was examined. In Experiment 1, each participant received a stimulus set in which (a) 80% of trials presented a moving target and 20% of trials presented a stationary target or (b) 20% of trials presented a moving target and 80% of trials presented a stationary target. In Experiment 2, each participant received a stimulus set in which (a) 80% of trials presented rightward motion and 20% of trials presented leftward motion, (b) 50% of trials presented rightward motion and 50% of trials presented leftward motion, or (c) 20% of trials presented rightward motion and 80% of trials presented leftward motion. Representational momentum of a moving target was not influenced by whether the majority of other trials in the stimulus set presented a stationary target, motion in the same direction, or motion in the opposite direction. The results suggest that behavior of targets on other trials was not effective in creating expectations that influenced representational momentum of the current target. Implications for theories of representational momentum are noted.

查看原文本刊更多论文

跨试验目标行为是否影响表征动量？

研究了其他实验中被试的行为是否会影响当前被试的表征动量。在实验1中，每个被试都接受一组刺激，其中(a) 80%的试验为运动目标，20%的试验为静止目标，或(b) 20%的试验为运动目标，80%的试验为静止目标。在实验2中，每个被试接受的刺激集合为：(a) 80%的实验为向右运动，20%的实验为向左运动，(b) 50%的实验为向右运动，50%的实验为向左运动，或(c) 20%的实验为向右运动，80%的实验为向左运动。运动目标的表征动量不受刺激集中大多数其他试验呈现静止目标、相同方向运动或相反方向运动的影响。结果表明，在其他实验中，目标的行为并不能有效地产生影响当前目标表征动量的期望。注意到表征动量理论的含义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Perception 医学-心理学

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

5.90%

发文量

审稿时长

4-8 weeks

期刊介绍： Perception is a traditional print journal covering all areas of the perceptual sciences, but with a strong historical emphasis on perceptual illusions. Perception is a subscription journal, free for authors to publish their research as a Standard Article, Short Report or Short & Sweet. The journal also publishes Editorials and Book Reviews.