Measuring aspects of stigma cultures in healthcare settings.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Heather Stuart, Stephanie Knaak
{"title":"Measuring aspects of stigma cultures in healthcare settings.","authors":"Heather Stuart, Stephanie Knaak","doi":"10.1007/s00127-024-02780-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Stigma cultures in healthcare settings are the organizational-level norms values, assumptions, physical façades, and practices that govern day to day activities and interactions. Aspects include poor quality of care, coercive care, a punitive and patronizing atmosphere, and disempowerment to make treatment decisions. To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to reduce stigma cultures in healthcare settings, valid and reliable measures are needed. This paper describes the development and preliminary testing of a measure to assess mental illness related stigma in healthcare cultures from the perspectives of service users.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Item generation was grounded in the lived experiences of people with a mental or substance use disorder (n = 20) reflecting their personal experiences with physical or mental healthcare encounters. Wherever possible, items were adapted from existing scales. Items were rated on a 4-point agreement scale with higher scores indicating higher stigma. Following the qualitative analysis, survey data (n = 2,476) were collected and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis on split halves of the sample were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analyses provided statistical support for a 23-item unidimensional scale that could be used in any healthcare setting to assess key aspects of stigma cultures such as poor quality of care or lack of person-centered care. Reliability was high (0.92) and aggregated scale scores (ranging from 0 to 92) were approximately normal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Though further testing is needed, the resulting Stigma Cultures in Healthcare scale is intended to be used across a range of physical and mental healthcare settings to assess the extent to which key aspects of care are experienced as stigmatizing by clients with mental or substance use disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-024-02780-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Stigma cultures in healthcare settings are the organizational-level norms values, assumptions, physical façades, and practices that govern day to day activities and interactions. Aspects include poor quality of care, coercive care, a punitive and patronizing atmosphere, and disempowerment to make treatment decisions. To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to reduce stigma cultures in healthcare settings, valid and reliable measures are needed. This paper describes the development and preliminary testing of a measure to assess mental illness related stigma in healthcare cultures from the perspectives of service users.

Methods: Item generation was grounded in the lived experiences of people with a mental or substance use disorder (n = 20) reflecting their personal experiences with physical or mental healthcare encounters. Wherever possible, items were adapted from existing scales. Items were rated on a 4-point agreement scale with higher scores indicating higher stigma. Following the qualitative analysis, survey data (n = 2,476) were collected and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis on split halves of the sample were conducted.

Results: The analyses provided statistical support for a 23-item unidimensional scale that could be used in any healthcare setting to assess key aspects of stigma cultures such as poor quality of care or lack of person-centered care. Reliability was high (0.92) and aggregated scale scores (ranging from 0 to 92) were approximately normal.

Conclusions: Though further testing is needed, the resulting Stigma Cultures in Healthcare scale is intended to be used across a range of physical and mental healthcare settings to assess the extent to which key aspects of care are experienced as stigmatizing by clients with mental or substance use disorders.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.30%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic. In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation. Both original work and review articles may be submitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信