Study of Conduction Blocks in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction – A Cross-Sectional Analysis

IF 0.9 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Swapnil Shinde, Nitin Jadhav
{"title":"Study of Conduction Blocks in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction – A Cross-Sectional Analysis","authors":"Swapnil Shinde, Nitin Jadhav","doi":"10.5152/eurasianjmed.2024.20164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Conduction blocks complicating ST(ST-segment)-elevation myocardial infarction are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Research indicates that anterior and inferior wall myocardial infarction were the most encountered causes of blocks but with conflicting results. However, patterns of conduction blocks have not been widely established in our population. The aim was to study the various patterns of conduction blocks following ST-elevation myocardial infarction and their prognostic implications. Prospectively, 70 patients, aged > 18 years, diagnosed with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction were included in the study. Post intensive care unit admission, all patients were observed for conduction blocks using a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram and repeated the same every 48 h throughout the hospitalization stay. Statistical analysis was performed using software R version 3.6.0. Out of 70 patients, 70% were males. Mean age was 60.7 ± 13.4 years. The proportion of blocks was first-degree heart block (28.6%), Mobitz II heart block (20%), complete heart block (17.1%), Mobitz I heart block (11.4%), right bundle branch block (10%), left bundle branch block (10%), left anterior hemiblock (1.4%), and trifascicular block (1.4%). No significant diference was found between males and females with respect to various conduction heart blocks (P > .05). Mortality was observed only in patients with complete heart block (11.4%) and first-degree heart block (2.8%; P = .003). Statistically, no significant diference was observed between various conduction blocks with respect to cardiac enzymes, random blood sugar, and lipid levels (P > .05). High mortality rate has been found in the patients with complete heart block indicating that severity of conduction block is a predictor of poor outcome in the ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":53592,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Medicine","volume":"56 3","pages":"148-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2024.20164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conduction blocks complicating ST(ST-segment)-elevation myocardial infarction are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Research indicates that anterior and inferior wall myocardial infarction were the most encountered causes of blocks but with conflicting results. However, patterns of conduction blocks have not been widely established in our population. The aim was to study the various patterns of conduction blocks following ST-elevation myocardial infarction and their prognostic implications. Prospectively, 70 patients, aged > 18 years, diagnosed with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction were included in the study. Post intensive care unit admission, all patients were observed for conduction blocks using a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram and repeated the same every 48 h throughout the hospitalization stay. Statistical analysis was performed using software R version 3.6.0. Out of 70 patients, 70% were males. Mean age was 60.7 ± 13.4 years. The proportion of blocks was first-degree heart block (28.6%), Mobitz II heart block (20%), complete heart block (17.1%), Mobitz I heart block (11.4%), right bundle branch block (10%), left bundle branch block (10%), left anterior hemiblock (1.4%), and trifascicular block (1.4%). No significant diference was found between males and females with respect to various conduction heart blocks (P > .05). Mortality was observed only in patients with complete heart block (11.4%) and first-degree heart block (2.8%; P = .003). Statistically, no significant diference was observed between various conduction blocks with respect to cardiac enzymes, random blood sugar, and lipid levels (P > .05). High mortality rate has been found in the patients with complete heart block indicating that severity of conduction block is a predictor of poor outcome in the ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eurasian Journal of Medicine
Eurasian Journal of Medicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
59
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Eurasian Journal of Medicine (Eurasian J Med) is an international, scientific, open access periodical published by independent, unbiased, and triple-blinded peer-review principles. The journal is the official publication of Atatürk University School of Medicine and published triannually in February, June, and October. The publication language of the journal is English. The aim of the Eurasian Journal of Medicine is to publish original research papers of the highest scientific and clinical value in all medical fields. The Eurasian J Med also includes reviews, editorial short notes and letters to the editor that either as a comment related to recently published articles in our journal or as a case report. The target audience of the journal includes researchers, physicians and healthcare professionals who are interested or working in in all medical disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信