Eliciting parents' decision-making to antibiotic use for upper respiratory tract infections: A discrete choice experiment.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Lixia Duan, Rujiao Lin, Dan Wang, Xi Wang, Xinyi Zhang, Liping Ding, Chenxi Liu
{"title":"Eliciting parents' decision-making to antibiotic use for upper respiratory tract infections: A discrete choice experiment.","authors":"Lixia Duan, Rujiao Lin, Dan Wang, Xi Wang, Xinyi Zhang, Liping Ding, Chenxi Liu","doi":"10.7189/jogh.14.04220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Addressing antibiotic resistance is important for reducing parents' self-medication of antibiotics for children's upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs). However, the decision-making process for parents who irrationally use such antibiotics is still unclear. In this study, we aimed to explore the reasons why parents self-medicate antibiotics for children's URTIs based on a discrete choice experiment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and in-depth interviews to identify the key attributes of choices when parents self-medicate antibiotics for children's URTIs. We developed and applied a discrete choice experiment in Wuhan and Chongqing, China. We used a mixed logit model to determine the impact of various attributes on parents' decisions, while we applied latent class logit models to explore different decision-making patterns within populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 400 valid responses were returned from parents. It was shown that symptom severity was the most important in parents' decision-making to self-medicate antibiotics for children's URTIs, followed by risk of side effects or resistance, duration, total cost, onset time of antibiotic, and antibiotic effectiveness. More severe and longer symptoms, perceived higher effectiveness, and fewer side effects of antibiotics consistently were significantly associated with parents' more likely to self-medicate with antibiotics for children's URTIs. There are also different patterns of decision-making of parents, including 'symptoms-oriented,' 'safety-oriented,' and 'comprehensive consideration.' Parents' gender and educational level were associated with decision-making patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Parents' self-medication of antibiotics for children's URTIs was mainly driven by symptoms, followed by perceived antibiotic value. We recommend a multi-faceted intervention strategy to enhance parents' ability to differentiate mild from severe URTIs, as well as their knowledge of antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"14 ","pages":"04220"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.04220","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Addressing antibiotic resistance is important for reducing parents' self-medication of antibiotics for children's upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs). However, the decision-making process for parents who irrationally use such antibiotics is still unclear. In this study, we aimed to explore the reasons why parents self-medicate antibiotics for children's URTIs based on a discrete choice experiment.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and in-depth interviews to identify the key attributes of choices when parents self-medicate antibiotics for children's URTIs. We developed and applied a discrete choice experiment in Wuhan and Chongqing, China. We used a mixed logit model to determine the impact of various attributes on parents' decisions, while we applied latent class logit models to explore different decision-making patterns within populations.

Results: A total of 400 valid responses were returned from parents. It was shown that symptom severity was the most important in parents' decision-making to self-medicate antibiotics for children's URTIs, followed by risk of side effects or resistance, duration, total cost, onset time of antibiotic, and antibiotic effectiveness. More severe and longer symptoms, perceived higher effectiveness, and fewer side effects of antibiotics consistently were significantly associated with parents' more likely to self-medicate with antibiotics for children's URTIs. There are also different patterns of decision-making of parents, including 'symptoms-oriented,' 'safety-oriented,' and 'comprehensive consideration.' Parents' gender and educational level were associated with decision-making patterns.

Conclusions: Parents' self-medication of antibiotics for children's URTIs was mainly driven by symptoms, followed by perceived antibiotic value. We recommend a multi-faceted intervention strategy to enhance parents' ability to differentiate mild from severe URTIs, as well as their knowledge of antibiotics.

诱导父母对上呼吸道感染使用抗生素的决策:一个离散选择实验。
背景:解决抗生素耐药性问题对于减少儿童上呼吸道感染(URTIs)患者家长自行使用抗生素具有重要意义。然而,不合理使用此类抗生素的父母的决策过程仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们旨在通过离散选择实验来探讨父母对儿童尿路感染自行使用抗生素的原因。方法:我们进行了系统回顾和深入访谈,以确定家长在为儿童尿道感染自行使用抗生素时选择的关键属性。我们在中国武汉和重庆开发并应用了一个离散选择实验。我们使用混合logit模型来确定各种属性对父母决策的影响,而我们使用潜在类别logit模型来探索群体内不同的决策模式。结果:共收到家长有效回复400份。结果表明,症状严重程度是影响家长对儿童尿路感染自行用药决策的最重要因素,其次是副作用或耐药风险、持续时间、总费用、抗生素起效时间和抗生素有效性。更严重和更长时间的症状、更高的有效性和更少的抗生素副作用与父母更有可能自我使用抗生素治疗儿童尿路感染显著相关。父母的决策模式也不同,包括“症状导向”、“安全导向”和“综合考虑”。父母的性别和受教育程度与决策模式有关。结论:儿童尿路感染患者家长自行用药以症状驱动为主,其次是感知抗生素价值驱动。我们建议采取多方面的干预策略,以提高家长区分轻度和重度尿路感染的能力,以及他们对抗生素的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信