Evaluation of Clear Aligner Attachments Bonded to Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Prepared with Different Surface Roughening Methods: An In Vitro Study.

Q3 Dentistry
Abdullah M Fayyadh, Mohammed A Elbialy, Marwa A Tawfik
{"title":"Evaluation of Clear Aligner Attachments Bonded to Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Prepared with Different Surface Roughening Methods: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.","authors":"Abdullah M Fayyadh, Mohammed A Elbialy, Marwa A Tawfik","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to assess the effects of surface conditioning and different composite types on the surface roughness (SR) and shear bond strength (SBS) between lithium disilicate and clear aligner composite attachments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty ivoclar vivadent pressable (IPS) e.max press specimens were randomly allocated into four groups (<i>n</i> = 20) based on the surface treatment method employed. Group I: Used sandblasting with 50 μm Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> slurry particles; group II: Used 9.5% hydrofluoric acid (HFA); group III: Used 37% phosphoric acid (PhA); and group IV: Used an Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Surface roughness was measured using a stylus profilometer. For SBS, each group was split into two subgroups based on the composite type (<i>n</i> = 10): Filtek<sup>TM</sup> Z350 supreme ultra flowable and Filtek<sup>TM</sup> Z350. The evaluation of SBS was conducted using Instron universal testing equipment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicated that the sandblasting group gave the highest mean surface roughness, while the 37% PhA group showed the lowest recorded value. In addition, the HFA group had the highest mean SBS, while the 37% PhA group demonstrated the lowest SBS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The interaction of HFA and Filtek<sup>TM</sup> Z350 demonstrated the highest SBS, followed by sandblasting and Filtek<sup>TM</sup> Z350.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The current study may guide orthodontists to choose the appropriate composite material and conditioning technique to achieve a strong SBS between clear aligner composite attachments and lithium disilicate ceramic. How to cite this article: Fayyadh AM, Elbialy MA, Tawfik MA. Evaluation of Clear Aligner Attachments Bonded to Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Prepared with Different Surface Roughening Methods: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(8):766-771.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"25 8","pages":"766-771"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to assess the effects of surface conditioning and different composite types on the surface roughness (SR) and shear bond strength (SBS) between lithium disilicate and clear aligner composite attachments.

Materials and methods: Eighty ivoclar vivadent pressable (IPS) e.max press specimens were randomly allocated into four groups (n = 20) based on the surface treatment method employed. Group I: Used sandblasting with 50 μm Al2O3 slurry particles; group II: Used 9.5% hydrofluoric acid (HFA); group III: Used 37% phosphoric acid (PhA); and group IV: Used an Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Surface roughness was measured using a stylus profilometer. For SBS, each group was split into two subgroups based on the composite type (n = 10): FiltekTM Z350 supreme ultra flowable and FiltekTM Z350. The evaluation of SBS was conducted using Instron universal testing equipment.

Results: The results indicated that the sandblasting group gave the highest mean surface roughness, while the 37% PhA group showed the lowest recorded value. In addition, the HFA group had the highest mean SBS, while the 37% PhA group demonstrated the lowest SBS.

Conclusion: The interaction of HFA and FiltekTM Z350 demonstrated the highest SBS, followed by sandblasting and FiltekTM Z350.

Clinical significance: The current study may guide orthodontists to choose the appropriate composite material and conditioning technique to achieve a strong SBS between clear aligner composite attachments and lithium disilicate ceramic. How to cite this article: Fayyadh AM, Elbialy MA, Tawfik MA. Evaluation of Clear Aligner Attachments Bonded to Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Prepared with Different Surface Roughening Methods: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(8):766-771.

不同表面粗化方法制备的二硅酸锂陶瓷上明确对准器附着物的评价:体外研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估表面处理和不同复合材料类型对二硅酸锂与透明对准剂复合材料附着体表面粗糙度(SR)和剪切粘结强度(SBS)的影响。材料与方法:根据表面处理方法的不同,将80个ivoclar vivadensable (IPS) e.max按压标本随机分为4组(n = 20)。第一组:采用50 μm Al2O3砂浆颗粒喷砂;第二组:使用9.5%氢氟酸(HFA);第三组:使用37%磷酸(PhA);第四组:Er,Cr:YSGG激光器。表面粗糙度用触针轮廓仪测量。SBS按复合类型(n = 10)分为两个亚组:FiltekTM Z350 supreme ultra - flowable和FiltekTM Z350。采用Instron通用测试设备对SBS进行了评价。结果:喷砂组的平均表面粗糙度最高,37% PhA组的平均表面粗糙度最低。此外,HFA组的平均SBS最高,37% PhA组的平均SBS最低。结论:HFA与FiltekTM Z350相互作用的SBS最高,喷砂次之,FiltekTM Z350次之。临床意义:本研究可指导正畸医师选择合适的复合材料和调理技术,实现清晰矫正器复合附着体与二硅酸锂陶瓷之间的强SBS。如何引用本文:Fayyadh AM, Elbialy MA, Tawfik MA。不同表面粗化方法制备的二硅酸锂陶瓷上明确对准器附着物的评价:体外研究。[J]现代医学学报;2009;25(8):766-771。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信