Long-Term Adverse Effects After Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT): A Narrative Analysis Exploring People's Experiences, Meaning-Making, and Coping.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Emily Shipwright, David Murphy
{"title":"Long-Term Adverse Effects After Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT): A Narrative Analysis Exploring People's Experiences, Meaning-Making, and Coping.","authors":"Emily Shipwright, David Murphy","doi":"10.1177/10497323241303391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Approximately 2500 people receive electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) annually in the United Kingdom; however, there is growing evidence of long-term adverse effects. Few studies have focused on people's experience of ECT, particularly over the long term. The experience of ECT is known to be complex, requiring qualitative exploration. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the long-term adverse experiences of ECT, including psychological impacts, meaning-making, and coping. Narrative analysis considered thematic, structural, and performative elements of seven people's stories. Themes were explored across the timeline of participants' experiences. Before ECT, participants felt misinformed regarding ECT and misunderstood by healthcare professionals. They noticed immediate changes in their cognition, memory, and mood after ECT. Returning home was important in participants' discovery of differences. Long-term impacts were loss (of ability, memory, humanity, and connection), the realization that ECT had been damaging, and understanding ECT to have caused brain damage. The extensive nature of loss experienced by participants was comparable to the concept of ambiguous loss. They experienced a lack of follow-up care and denial of their experiences, which could contribute to psychological iatrogenic harm. Participants coped with adverse experiences by using prompts and strategies and connecting with others. Further research is needed into the adverse long-term effects of ECT, especially considering cognitive effects, memory loss, and how these contribute to a changed sense of self. Service development is urgently required, especially for ECT follow-up care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323241303391"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241303391","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Approximately 2500 people receive electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) annually in the United Kingdom; however, there is growing evidence of long-term adverse effects. Few studies have focused on people's experience of ECT, particularly over the long term. The experience of ECT is known to be complex, requiring qualitative exploration. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the long-term adverse experiences of ECT, including psychological impacts, meaning-making, and coping. Narrative analysis considered thematic, structural, and performative elements of seven people's stories. Themes were explored across the timeline of participants' experiences. Before ECT, participants felt misinformed regarding ECT and misunderstood by healthcare professionals. They noticed immediate changes in their cognition, memory, and mood after ECT. Returning home was important in participants' discovery of differences. Long-term impacts were loss (of ability, memory, humanity, and connection), the realization that ECT had been damaging, and understanding ECT to have caused brain damage. The extensive nature of loss experienced by participants was comparable to the concept of ambiguous loss. They experienced a lack of follow-up care and denial of their experiences, which could contribute to psychological iatrogenic harm. Participants coped with adverse experiences by using prompts and strategies and connecting with others. Further research is needed into the adverse long-term effects of ECT, especially considering cognitive effects, memory loss, and how these contribute to a changed sense of self. Service development is urgently required, especially for ECT follow-up care.

电休克治疗(ECT)后的长期不良反应:一个探索人们经历、意义制造和应对的叙事分析。
在英国,每年大约有2500人接受电休克疗法(ECT);然而,越来越多的证据表明长期的副作用。很少有研究关注人们对电痉挛疗法的体验,尤其是长期的。ECT的经验是复杂的,需要定性的探索。因此,本研究旨在探讨电痉挛治疗的长期不良经历,包括心理影响、意义产生和应对。叙事分析考虑了七个人故事的主题、结构和表演元素。主题是在参与者经历的时间轴上探索的。在ECT之前,参与者感到关于ECT的错误信息和被医疗保健专业人员误解。他们注意到在ECT之后,他们的认知、记忆和情绪都发生了立即的变化。回家对参与者发现差异很重要。长期影响是丧失(能力、记忆、人性和联系),意识到电痉挛疗法是有害的,并理解电痉挛疗法会导致脑损伤。参与者所经历的损失的广泛性与模糊损失的概念相当。他们经历了缺乏后续护理和否认他们的经历,这可能导致心理医源性伤害。参与者通过使用提示和策略以及与他人联系来应对不良经历。需要进一步研究电痉挛疗法的长期不良影响,特别是考虑到认知影响、记忆丧失,以及这些因素如何导致自我意识的改变。服务的发展是迫切需要的,特别是对ECT的随访护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信