Effect of inspiratory and expiratory muscle training on respiratory function and decannulation outcome in patients with tracheostomy after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Lei Li, Rui Liu, Zhonghua Yu, Jing He, Quan Wei
{"title":"Effect of inspiratory and expiratory muscle training on respiratory function and decannulation outcome in patients with tracheostomy after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Lei Li, Rui Liu, Zhonghua Yu, Jing He, Quan Wei","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2024.2437328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of inspiratory and expiratory muscle training (IEMT) for patients who underwent tracheostomy after stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was an investigator-initiated, single-center, two-arm, evaluator-blinded, randomized clinical trial conducted at West China Hospital of Sichuan University, China, from January 2022 to June 2022. The patients were randomly divided into the intervention group and control group. Patients in both groups received conventional clinical, rehabilitation treatment and usual care. The intervention group also received IEMT for three weeks. There were three primary outcomes including maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP, cmH<sub>2</sub>O), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP, cmH2O) and decannulation outcome after intervention (n, %). The secondary outcomes were other respiratory function outcomes, motor function, activities of daily living (ADL), quality of life (QoL) and the new pulmonary infection rate after the intervention at three weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 50 participants were enrolled [25 in each group; 39 (78%) were men; mean (SD) age, 55.94 (11.97) years]. At three weeks, significant differences were found in the MIP [control vs IEMT: 39.04 (6.21) vs 56.28 (10.41), <i>p</i> < 0.001]; MEP [43.48 (5.36) vs 62.16 (10.18), <i>p</i> < 0.001], and tracheal tube extraction success rate [2 (8%) vs 9 (36%), <i>p</i> = 0.019] between the two groups. In addition, the new pulmonary infection rate in the intervention groups were significantly different (all <i>p</i> < 0.05) from those in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IEMT can improve respiratory function, decannulation outcome, among patients with tracheostomy after stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2437328","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of inspiratory and expiratory muscle training (IEMT) for patients who underwent tracheostomy after stroke.

Methods: The study was an investigator-initiated, single-center, two-arm, evaluator-blinded, randomized clinical trial conducted at West China Hospital of Sichuan University, China, from January 2022 to June 2022. The patients were randomly divided into the intervention group and control group. Patients in both groups received conventional clinical, rehabilitation treatment and usual care. The intervention group also received IEMT for three weeks. There were three primary outcomes including maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP, cmH2O), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP, cmH2O) and decannulation outcome after intervention (n, %). The secondary outcomes were other respiratory function outcomes, motor function, activities of daily living (ADL), quality of life (QoL) and the new pulmonary infection rate after the intervention at three weeks.

Results: A total of 50 participants were enrolled [25 in each group; 39 (78%) were men; mean (SD) age, 55.94 (11.97) years]. At three weeks, significant differences were found in the MIP [control vs IEMT: 39.04 (6.21) vs 56.28 (10.41), p < 0.001]; MEP [43.48 (5.36) vs 62.16 (10.18), p < 0.001], and tracheal tube extraction success rate [2 (8%) vs 9 (36%), p = 0.019] between the two groups. In addition, the new pulmonary infection rate in the intervention groups were significantly different (all p < 0.05) from those in the control group.

Conclusions: IEMT can improve respiratory function, decannulation outcome, among patients with tracheostomy after stroke.

吸气和呼气肌肉训练对中风后气管切开患者呼吸功能和拔管效果的影响:随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues. The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信