A bivariate reference interval for TSH and free thyroxine.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Arne Åsberg, Gustav Mikkelsen
{"title":"A bivariate reference interval for TSH and free thyroxine.","authors":"Arne Åsberg, Gustav Mikkelsen","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2024.2437613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Frequently, the serum concentrations of TSH (s-TSH) and free thyroxine (s-FT4) are interpreted together when a physician considers the patient's thyroid status. Then, each measurement is compared with its univariate reference interval. However, a pair of s-TSH and s-FT4 may be more appropriately assessed if compared with a <i>bivariate</i> reference interval. We constructed a bivariate reference interval for s-TSH and s-FT4 from their measurements in 495 healthy blood donors. After Box-Cox transformation, we estimated the Mahalanobis distances from each pair of s-TSH and s-FT4 to the center of the bivariate distribution. The 95 percentile in the distribution of the Mahalanobis distances was defined as the limit of the bivariate reference interval. Univariate reference intervals comprising the central 95% (2.5-97.5 percentile) and 97.5% (1.25-98.75 percentile) of reference values were estimated from the same data. Normal thyroid function was defined as both s-TSH and s-FT4 within their respective univariate reference intervals, or as a Mahalanobis distance within the 95% bivariate reference interval. In 177,514 specimens from adult individuals in out-patient care, 76.6% were classified as bivariate normal. The corresponding figures for the 95% and 97.5% univariate reference intervals were 68.9% and 76.2%, respectively. The kappa statistics for classification agreement between the bivariate 95% reference interval and the 95% and 97.5% univariate reference intervals were 0.790 and 0.881, respectively. We thought the bivariate reference interval to be clinically most accurate but were unable to prove it.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2024.2437613","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Frequently, the serum concentrations of TSH (s-TSH) and free thyroxine (s-FT4) are interpreted together when a physician considers the patient's thyroid status. Then, each measurement is compared with its univariate reference interval. However, a pair of s-TSH and s-FT4 may be more appropriately assessed if compared with a bivariate reference interval. We constructed a bivariate reference interval for s-TSH and s-FT4 from their measurements in 495 healthy blood donors. After Box-Cox transformation, we estimated the Mahalanobis distances from each pair of s-TSH and s-FT4 to the center of the bivariate distribution. The 95 percentile in the distribution of the Mahalanobis distances was defined as the limit of the bivariate reference interval. Univariate reference intervals comprising the central 95% (2.5-97.5 percentile) and 97.5% (1.25-98.75 percentile) of reference values were estimated from the same data. Normal thyroid function was defined as both s-TSH and s-FT4 within their respective univariate reference intervals, or as a Mahalanobis distance within the 95% bivariate reference interval. In 177,514 specimens from adult individuals in out-patient care, 76.6% were classified as bivariate normal. The corresponding figures for the 95% and 97.5% univariate reference intervals were 68.9% and 76.2%, respectively. The kappa statistics for classification agreement between the bivariate 95% reference interval and the 95% and 97.5% univariate reference intervals were 0.790 and 0.881, respectively. We thought the bivariate reference interval to be clinically most accurate but were unable to prove it.

促甲状腺激素和游离甲状腺素的双变量参考区间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
85
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry. The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信