Roads are partial barriers to foraging solitary bees in an urban landscape.

IF 2.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Chloé M Markovits, Nicholas N Dorian, Elizabeth E Crone
{"title":"Roads are partial barriers to foraging solitary bees in an urban landscape.","authors":"Chloé M Markovits, Nicholas N Dorian, Elizabeth E Crone","doi":"10.1007/s00442-024-05652-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding how animals navigate novel heterogeneous landscapes is key to predicting species responses to land-use change. Roads are pervasive features of human-altered landscapes, known to alter movement patterns and habitat connectivity of vertebrates like small mammals and amphibians. However, less is known about how roads influence movement of insects, a knowledge gap that is especially glaring in light of recent investments in habitat plantings for insect pollinators along roads verges and medians. In this study, we experimentally investigate behavioral avoidance of roads by a solitary bee and explore whether landscape factors are associated with bee movement in urban Massachusetts, USA. Using mark-recapture surveys, we tracked individual solitary bee (Agapostemon virescens) foraging movements among floral patches separated by roads or grass lawn. We found that roads acted as partial barriers to movements of foraging bees, with road crossings nearly half as likely as along-road movements (36% vs. 64%). Movement probabilities were negatively associated with distance and the proportion of roadway between patches, and positively associated with higher floral resource density at the destination patch. Importantly, our findings also suggest that while roads impede bee movement, they are not complete barriers to dispersal of bees and/or transfer of pollen in urban landscapes. In the context of green space design, our findings suggest that prioritizing contiguous habitat and ensuring higher floral densities along road edges may enhance resource access for pollinators and mitigate the risk of ecological traps.</p>","PeriodicalId":19473,"journal":{"name":"Oecologia","volume":"207 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecologia","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-024-05652-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding how animals navigate novel heterogeneous landscapes is key to predicting species responses to land-use change. Roads are pervasive features of human-altered landscapes, known to alter movement patterns and habitat connectivity of vertebrates like small mammals and amphibians. However, less is known about how roads influence movement of insects, a knowledge gap that is especially glaring in light of recent investments in habitat plantings for insect pollinators along roads verges and medians. In this study, we experimentally investigate behavioral avoidance of roads by a solitary bee and explore whether landscape factors are associated with bee movement in urban Massachusetts, USA. Using mark-recapture surveys, we tracked individual solitary bee (Agapostemon virescens) foraging movements among floral patches separated by roads or grass lawn. We found that roads acted as partial barriers to movements of foraging bees, with road crossings nearly half as likely as along-road movements (36% vs. 64%). Movement probabilities were negatively associated with distance and the proportion of roadway between patches, and positively associated with higher floral resource density at the destination patch. Importantly, our findings also suggest that while roads impede bee movement, they are not complete barriers to dispersal of bees and/or transfer of pollen in urban landscapes. In the context of green space design, our findings suggest that prioritizing contiguous habitat and ensuring higher floral densities along road edges may enhance resource access for pollinators and mitigate the risk of ecological traps.

道路在一定程度上阻碍了独居蜜蜂在城市景观中觅食。
了解动物如何在新的异质景观中导航是预测物种对土地利用变化反应的关键。道路是人类改变景观的普遍特征,已知会改变小型哺乳动物和两栖动物等脊椎动物的运动模式和栖息地连通性。然而,人们对道路如何影响昆虫的运动知之甚少,鉴于最近在道路边缘和中间地带为昆虫传粉媒介种植栖息地的投资,这一知识差距尤其明显。在这项研究中,我们通过实验研究了美国马萨诸塞州城市中独居蜜蜂的行为回避行为,并探讨了景观因素是否与蜜蜂运动有关。利用标记-再捕获调查,我们跟踪了被道路或草坪隔开的花卉斑块中单个独居蜜蜂(Agapostemon virescens)的觅食运动。我们发现,道路对觅食蜜蜂的移动起到了部分障碍的作用,穿越道路的可能性几乎是沿着道路移动的一半(36%对64%)。移动概率与斑块间的距离和道路比例呈负相关,与目的地斑块较高的花卉资源密度呈正相关。重要的是,我们的研究结果还表明,虽然道路阻碍了蜜蜂的运动,但它们并不是蜜蜂传播和/或花粉在城市景观中转移的完全障碍。在绿色空间设计的背景下,我们的研究结果表明,优先考虑邻近的栖息地,并确保沿道路边缘较高的植物密度,可以增加传粉媒介的资源获取,减轻生态陷阱的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oecologia
Oecologia 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Oecologia publishes innovative ecological research of international interest. We seek reviews, advances in methodology, and original contributions, emphasizing the following areas: Population ecology, Plant-microbe-animal interactions, Ecosystem ecology, Community ecology, Global change ecology, Conservation ecology, Behavioral ecology and Physiological Ecology. In general, studies that are purely descriptive, mathematical, documentary, and/or natural history will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信