A transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation device for the relief of neuropathic pain in NMOSD: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial.

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anastasia Vishnevetsky, Gabriela Romanow, Michael Levy
{"title":"A transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation device for the relief of neuropathic pain in NMOSD: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial.","authors":"Anastasia Vishnevetsky, Gabriela Romanow, Michael Levy","doi":"10.1177/20552173241301018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) often suffer from severe, disabling, and treatment-refractory neuropathic pain. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) therapy is a non-invasive, pain-modifying device.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether TENS therapy is safe, tolerable, and effective for neuropathic pain in patients with NMOSD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a four-week, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, remote trial of TENS in patients with NMOSD who have neuropathic pain, followed by a 12-week open-label extension period. The difference in the Numeric Rating Scale current pain scores between 0 weeks and 4 weeks was the primary outcome measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-six patients (23 per arm) were enrolled in this trial, of which 40 were included in the primary analysis (four in the intervention arm and two in the sham arm withdrew prior to assessment of the primary outcome). Both the sham and intervention arms demonstrated significant decreases in average pain, worst pain, and current pain rating between baseline and 4 weeks, but there was no significant difference between the two arms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, there was no demonstrated benefit of TENS over sham TENS treatment, however, both arms demonstrated significant decreases in reported pain between baseline and 4 weeks. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04614454.</p>","PeriodicalId":18961,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical","volume":"10 4","pages":"20552173241301018"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622348/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552173241301018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individuals with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) often suffer from severe, disabling, and treatment-refractory neuropathic pain. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) therapy is a non-invasive, pain-modifying device.

Objective: To determine whether TENS therapy is safe, tolerable, and effective for neuropathic pain in patients with NMOSD.

Methods: We conducted a four-week, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, remote trial of TENS in patients with NMOSD who have neuropathic pain, followed by a 12-week open-label extension period. The difference in the Numeric Rating Scale current pain scores between 0 weeks and 4 weeks was the primary outcome measure.

Results: Forty-six patients (23 per arm) were enrolled in this trial, of which 40 were included in the primary analysis (four in the intervention arm and two in the sham arm withdrew prior to assessment of the primary outcome). Both the sham and intervention arms demonstrated significant decreases in average pain, worst pain, and current pain rating between baseline and 4 weeks, but there was no significant difference between the two arms.

Conclusions: In conclusion, there was no demonstrated benefit of TENS over sham TENS treatment, however, both arms demonstrated significant decreases in reported pain between baseline and 4 weeks. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04614454.

经皮神经电刺激装置缓解NMOSD神经性疼痛:一项随机、双盲、假对照试验。
背景:视神经脊髓炎谱系障碍(NMOSD)患者通常患有严重的、致残的、难治性神经性疼痛。经皮神经电刺激(TENS)治疗是一种非侵入性的止痛装置。目的:探讨TENS治疗NMOSD患者神经性疼痛的安全性、耐受性和有效性。方法:我们对患有神经性疼痛的NMOSD患者进行了为期四周的随机、双盲、假对照、远程试验,随后进行了12周的开放标签延长期。0周和4周之间数值评定量表当前疼痛评分的差异是主要的结局衡量指标。结果:46例患者(每组23例)入组,其中40例纳入主要分析(干预组4例,假手术组2例在主要结果评估前退出)。从基线到4周,假手术组和干预组的平均疼痛、最严重疼痛和当前疼痛评分均有显著降低,但两组之间无显著差异。结论:结论是,没有证据表明TENS优于假TENS治疗,然而,两组在基线和4周之间报告的疼痛均有显着降低。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT04614454。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信