{"title":"The causal effects of childhood sunburn occasions on melanoma: A univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization study.","authors":"Wei Sun, Huihui Sun, Chong Yu","doi":"10.1515/med-2024-1078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Observational studies have shown an association between childhood sunburn occasions (CSOs) and melanoma <i>in situ</i> (MIS). However, these studies have shown contradictory results. Here, we used a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) method to make a causal inference between CSOs and melanoma at the genetic level. Based on the publicly available genome-wide association study summary data, including childhood sunburn (<i>n</i> = 346,955) and MIS (<i>n</i> = 218,792), the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method of the random effects model was used, supplemented by the MR-Egger method, the weighted median method, and the weighted mode method. IVW results showed a 2.58-fold increased risk of melanoma development for each standard deviation increase in CSOs (odds ratio [OR] = 3.58; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.68-7.64; <i>P</i> = 1.00 × 10<sup>-3</sup>), with the MR-Egger (OR = 4.76, 95% CI: 1.65-13.75, <i>P</i> = 5.60 × 10<sup>-3</sup>), weighted median (OR = 4.89, 95% CI: 1.62-14.76, <i>P</i> = 4.90 × 10<sup>-3</sup>), and weighted mode (OR = 6.26, 95% CI: 2.49-15.77, <i>P</i> = 3.00 × 10<sup>-4</sup>) supporting the results. Furthermore, both the funnel plot and the MR-Egger intercepts showed the absence of directional pleiotropy between childhood sunburn and MIS. Our study confirmed that CSOs increase the risk of melanoma development.</p>","PeriodicalId":19715,"journal":{"name":"Open Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":"20241078"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11627034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2024-1078","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Observational studies have shown an association between childhood sunburn occasions (CSOs) and melanoma in situ (MIS). However, these studies have shown contradictory results. Here, we used a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) method to make a causal inference between CSOs and melanoma at the genetic level. Based on the publicly available genome-wide association study summary data, including childhood sunburn (n = 346,955) and MIS (n = 218,792), the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method of the random effects model was used, supplemented by the MR-Egger method, the weighted median method, and the weighted mode method. IVW results showed a 2.58-fold increased risk of melanoma development for each standard deviation increase in CSOs (odds ratio [OR] = 3.58; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.68-7.64; P = 1.00 × 10-3), with the MR-Egger (OR = 4.76, 95% CI: 1.65-13.75, P = 5.60 × 10-3), weighted median (OR = 4.89, 95% CI: 1.62-14.76, P = 4.90 × 10-3), and weighted mode (OR = 6.26, 95% CI: 2.49-15.77, P = 3.00 × 10-4) supporting the results. Furthermore, both the funnel plot and the MR-Egger intercepts showed the absence of directional pleiotropy between childhood sunburn and MIS. Our study confirmed that CSOs increase the risk of melanoma development.
期刊介绍:
Open Medicine is an open access journal that provides users with free, instant, and continued access to all content worldwide. The primary goal of the journal has always been a focus on maintaining the high quality of its published content. Its mission is to facilitate the exchange of ideas between medical science researchers from different countries. Papers connected to all fields of medicine and public health are welcomed. Open Medicine accepts submissions of research articles, reviews, case reports, letters to editor and book reviews.