Self-Determined Motivation for Alcohol Use and Drinking Frequency, Intensity, and Consequences.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Substance Use & Misuse Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1080/10826084.2024.2434684
J B Courtney, M A Russell, D E Conroy
{"title":"Self-Determined Motivation for Alcohol Use and Drinking Frequency, Intensity, and Consequences.","authors":"J B Courtney, M A Russell, D E Conroy","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2024.2434684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective:</i> Drinking motives predict drinking behaviors and outcomes among adults. Drinking motives are rarely studied using self-determination theory (SDT), which aligns with harm-reduction approaches to alcohol use, but SDT can offer a complementary theoretical framework to existing drinking motives frameworks that may help explain the observed heterogeneity in drinking motives and account for more variance in drinking outcomes. This study examined the associations between five SDT-based drinking motives with drinking frequency, intensity, and consequences. <i>Method:</i> A total number of 630 adults (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 21.5, 55% female, 88% undergraduates) rated drinking motives using the Comprehensive Relative Autonomy Index for Drinking (CRAI-Drinking) and the Drinking Motives Questionnaire (DMQ), typical alcohol consumption, and negative and positive drinking consequences. <i>Results:</i> Poisson regressions indicated that intrinsic (IRR = 1.13) and identified (IRR = 1.11) regulations were significantly associated with drinking frequency, identified (IRR = 0.94) and positive introjected (IRR = 1.07) regulations were significantly associated with drinking intensity, and amotivation (IRR = 1.16) and intrinsic regulation (IRR = 1.09) were associated with negative and positive consequences, respectively, after controlling for other CRAI-Drinking and DMQ scores, sex, and drinking intensity. After accounting for DMQ scores and sex, CRAI-Drinking scores accounted for 1.7%-9.9% additional deviance in drinking behaviors and consequences. <i>Conclusions:</i> Adults high in autonomous reasons for drinking reported low-risk, high-enjoyment drinking experiences. In contrast, adults with higher scores for amotivation for drinking reported more negative consequences, even after accounting for drinking intensity, suggesting that high amotivation for drinking may be a novel signal for future alcohol-related risks. These findings support the idea that SDT provides a useful framework for understanding drinking motives, behaviors, and consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":" ","pages":"787-797"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2434684","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Drinking motives predict drinking behaviors and outcomes among adults. Drinking motives are rarely studied using self-determination theory (SDT), which aligns with harm-reduction approaches to alcohol use, but SDT can offer a complementary theoretical framework to existing drinking motives frameworks that may help explain the observed heterogeneity in drinking motives and account for more variance in drinking outcomes. This study examined the associations between five SDT-based drinking motives with drinking frequency, intensity, and consequences. Method: A total number of 630 adults (Mage = 21.5, 55% female, 88% undergraduates) rated drinking motives using the Comprehensive Relative Autonomy Index for Drinking (CRAI-Drinking) and the Drinking Motives Questionnaire (DMQ), typical alcohol consumption, and negative and positive drinking consequences. Results: Poisson regressions indicated that intrinsic (IRR = 1.13) and identified (IRR = 1.11) regulations were significantly associated with drinking frequency, identified (IRR = 0.94) and positive introjected (IRR = 1.07) regulations were significantly associated with drinking intensity, and amotivation (IRR = 1.16) and intrinsic regulation (IRR = 1.09) were associated with negative and positive consequences, respectively, after controlling for other CRAI-Drinking and DMQ scores, sex, and drinking intensity. After accounting for DMQ scores and sex, CRAI-Drinking scores accounted for 1.7%-9.9% additional deviance in drinking behaviors and consequences. Conclusions: Adults high in autonomous reasons for drinking reported low-risk, high-enjoyment drinking experiences. In contrast, adults with higher scores for amotivation for drinking reported more negative consequences, even after accounting for drinking intensity, suggesting that high amotivation for drinking may be a novel signal for future alcohol-related risks. These findings support the idea that SDT provides a useful framework for understanding drinking motives, behaviors, and consequences.

酒精使用的自我决定动机、饮酒频率、强度和后果。
目的:饮酒动机预测成年人饮酒行为及其后果。很少使用自决理论(SDT)来研究饮酒动机,这与减少酒精使用的危害的方法相一致,但SDT可以为现有的饮酒动机框架提供一个补充的理论框架,这可能有助于解释观察到的饮酒动机的异质性,并解释饮酒结果的更多差异。本研究考察了五种基于sdd的饮酒动机与饮酒频率、强度和后果之间的关系。方法:630名成年人(男性21.5人,女性55%,大学生88%)使用饮酒综合相对自主指数(CRAI-Drinking)和饮酒动机问卷(DMQ)对饮酒动机、典型饮酒量、消极和积极饮酒后果进行评分。结果:泊松回归结果显示,在控制了其他cri - drinking和DMQ评分、性别、性别等因素后,内在调节(IRR = 1.13)和识别调节(IRR = 1.11)与饮酒频率显著相关,识别调节(IRR = 0.94)和正内注入调节(IRR = 1.07)与饮酒强度显著相关,动机调节(IRR = 1.16)和内在调节(IRR = 1.09)分别与消极和积极后果相关。还有饮酒强度。在考虑了DMQ分数和性别后,cri - drinking分数在饮酒行为和后果方面的额外偏差占1.7%-9.9%。结论:自主饮酒原因高的成年人报告了低风险、高享受的饮酒经历。相比之下,即使考虑到饮酒强度,饮酒动机得分较高的成年人也报告了更多的负面后果,这表明饮酒动机高可能是未来酒精相关风险的新信号。这些发现支持了SDT为理解饮酒动机、行为和后果提供了一个有用的框架的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信