Using Learning Health System Principles to Embed Patient Experience Data in Primary Care: A Qualitative Investigation.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Louise A Ellis, Georgia Fisher, Kate Churruca, Maree Saba, Tanja Schroeder, Janani Mahadeva, Sanjyot Vagholkar, Mark Yang Lee, Reema Harrison, Simon Willcock, Jeffrey Braithwaite
{"title":"Using Learning Health System Principles to Embed Patient Experience Data in Primary Care: A Qualitative Investigation.","authors":"Louise A Ellis, Georgia Fisher, Kate Churruca, Maree Saba, Tanja Schroeder, Janani Mahadeva, Sanjyot Vagholkar, Mark Yang Lee, Reema Harrison, Simon Willcock, Jeffrey Braithwaite","doi":"10.1002/hpm.3880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Though an important component of high-quality healthcare, the routine collection of patient experience data is limited in primary care, as is the evidence for how this data is being used for quality improvement. This study used a learning health system (LHS) framework to describe how a university-affiliated community general practice is integrating patient experience data into service and quality improvement efforts, and to identify barriers and facilitators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A co-designed qualitative case study was conducted with academic researchers and staff from a university-affiliated general practice in Australia. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in April 2024 with practice staff, and transcripts were deductively coded according to a five-domain learning health systems framework, and with additional codes capturing barriers and facilitators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen (53%) practice staff were interviewed, including general practitioners (n = 11), a practice nurse (n = 1), and administrative staff (n = 6). Participants identified multiple methods through which the practice captured the patient experience that spanned all domains of the LHS framework. However, there was less evidence of a coherent quality improvement strategy being employed, with associated barriers identified around staff workloads, training, and existing government funding policies. Key facilitators to the use of patient experience data included: membership of a larger health organisation and university; key dedicated administrative and clinical roles; and effective leadership, governance structures and policies to support continuous learning and drive service improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study presents a case example of how patient experience data is being integrated into general practice and identifies key barriers and facilitators to initiating and translating this data for continuous healthcare improvement. By mapping the use of patient experience data to a LHS framework, this study shows how LHS principles can be applied to primary care to facilitate the capture and use of patient experience data on an ongoing basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3880","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Though an important component of high-quality healthcare, the routine collection of patient experience data is limited in primary care, as is the evidence for how this data is being used for quality improvement. This study used a learning health system (LHS) framework to describe how a university-affiliated community general practice is integrating patient experience data into service and quality improvement efforts, and to identify barriers and facilitators.

Methods: A co-designed qualitative case study was conducted with academic researchers and staff from a university-affiliated general practice in Australia. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in April 2024 with practice staff, and transcripts were deductively coded according to a five-domain learning health systems framework, and with additional codes capturing barriers and facilitators.

Results: Eighteen (53%) practice staff were interviewed, including general practitioners (n = 11), a practice nurse (n = 1), and administrative staff (n = 6). Participants identified multiple methods through which the practice captured the patient experience that spanned all domains of the LHS framework. However, there was less evidence of a coherent quality improvement strategy being employed, with associated barriers identified around staff workloads, training, and existing government funding policies. Key facilitators to the use of patient experience data included: membership of a larger health organisation and university; key dedicated administrative and clinical roles; and effective leadership, governance structures and policies to support continuous learning and drive service improvement.

Conclusion: This study presents a case example of how patient experience data is being integrated into general practice and identifies key barriers and facilitators to initiating and translating this data for continuous healthcare improvement. By mapping the use of patient experience data to a LHS framework, this study shows how LHS principles can be applied to primary care to facilitate the capture and use of patient experience data on an ongoing basis.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信