A I Oloruntoba, M Asghari-Jafarabadi, M Sashindranath, Å Ingvar, N R Adler, C Vico-Alonso, L Niklasson, A L Caixinha, E Hiscutt, Z Holmes, K B Assersen, S Adamson, T Jegathees, T Bertelsen, V Velasco-Tamariz, T Helkkula, S Kristiansen, R Toholka, M S Goh, A Chamberlain, C McCormack, T Vestergaard, D Mehta, T D Nguyen, Z Ge, H P Soyer, V Mar
{"title":"Assessment of image quality on the diagnostic performance of clinicians and deep learning models: Cross-sectional comparative reader study.","authors":"A I Oloruntoba, M Asghari-Jafarabadi, M Sashindranath, Å Ingvar, N R Adler, C Vico-Alonso, L Niklasson, A L Caixinha, E Hiscutt, Z Holmes, K B Assersen, S Adamson, T Jegathees, T Bertelsen, V Velasco-Tamariz, T Helkkula, S Kristiansen, R Toholka, M S Goh, A Chamberlain, C McCormack, T Vestergaard, D Mehta, T D Nguyen, Z Ge, H P Soyer, V Mar","doi":"10.1111/jdv.20462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Skin cancer is a prevalent and clinically significant condition, with early and accurate diagnosis being crucial for improved patient outcomes. Dermoscopy and artificial intelligence (AI) hold promise in enhancing diagnostic accuracy. However, the impact of image quality, particularly high dynamic range (HDR) conversion in smartphone images, on diagnostic performance remains poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effect of varying image qualities, including HDR-enhanced dermoscopic images, on the diagnostic capabilities of clinicians and a convolutional neural network (CNN) model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen dermatology clinicians assessed 303 images of 101 skin lesions that were categorized into three image quality groups: low quality (LQ), high quality (HQ) and enhanced quality (EQ) produced using HDR-style conversion. Clinicians participated in a two part reader study that required their diagnosis, management and confidence level for each image assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the binary classification of lesions, clinicians had the greatest diagnostic performance with HQ images, with sensitivity (77.3%; CI 69.1-85.5), specificity (63.1%; CI 53.7-72.5) and accuracy (70.2%; CI 61.3-79.1). For the multiclass classification, the overall performance was also best with HQ images, attaining the greatest specificity (91.9%; CI 83.2-95.0) and accuracy (51.5%; CI 48.4-54.7). Clinicians had a superior performance (median correct diagnoses) to the CNN model for the binary classification of LQ and EQ images, but their performance was comparable on the HQ images. However, in the multiclass classification, the CNN model significantly outperformed the clinicians on HQ images (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the importance of image quality on the diagnostic performance of clinicians and deep learning models. This has significant implications for telehealth reporting and triage.</p>","PeriodicalId":17351,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.20462","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Skin cancer is a prevalent and clinically significant condition, with early and accurate diagnosis being crucial for improved patient outcomes. Dermoscopy and artificial intelligence (AI) hold promise in enhancing diagnostic accuracy. However, the impact of image quality, particularly high dynamic range (HDR) conversion in smartphone images, on diagnostic performance remains poorly understood.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of varying image qualities, including HDR-enhanced dermoscopic images, on the diagnostic capabilities of clinicians and a convolutional neural network (CNN) model.
Methods: Eighteen dermatology clinicians assessed 303 images of 101 skin lesions that were categorized into three image quality groups: low quality (LQ), high quality (HQ) and enhanced quality (EQ) produced using HDR-style conversion. Clinicians participated in a two part reader study that required their diagnosis, management and confidence level for each image assessed.
Results: In the binary classification of lesions, clinicians had the greatest diagnostic performance with HQ images, with sensitivity (77.3%; CI 69.1-85.5), specificity (63.1%; CI 53.7-72.5) and accuracy (70.2%; CI 61.3-79.1). For the multiclass classification, the overall performance was also best with HQ images, attaining the greatest specificity (91.9%; CI 83.2-95.0) and accuracy (51.5%; CI 48.4-54.7). Clinicians had a superior performance (median correct diagnoses) to the CNN model for the binary classification of LQ and EQ images, but their performance was comparable on the HQ images. However, in the multiclass classification, the CNN model significantly outperformed the clinicians on HQ images (p < 0.01).
Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of image quality on the diagnostic performance of clinicians and deep learning models. This has significant implications for telehealth reporting and triage.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (JEADV) is a publication that focuses on dermatology and venereology. It covers various topics within these fields, including both clinical and basic science subjects. The journal publishes articles in different formats, such as editorials, review articles, practice articles, original papers, short reports, letters to the editor, features, and announcements from the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV).
The journal covers a wide range of keywords, including allergy, cancer, clinical medicine, cytokines, dermatology, drug reactions, hair disease, laser therapy, nail disease, oncology, skin cancer, skin disease, therapeutics, tumors, virus infections, and venereology.
The JEADV is indexed and abstracted by various databases and resources, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Embase, Global Health, InfoTrac, Ingenta Select, MEDLINE/PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, and others.