Transepithelial Versus Epithelium-off Photorefractive Keratectomy in High Compound Myopic Astigmatism: A Contralateral Eye Study.

IF 2.9 3区医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY

Journal of refractive surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.3928/1081597X-20241021-03

Alireza Peyman, Mohammad Ghoreishi, Leila Babaei, Pegah Noorshargh, Ali Forouhari, Mohsen Pourazizi

{"title":"Transepithelial Versus Epithelium-off Photorefractive Keratectomy in High Compound Myopic Astigmatism: A Contralateral Eye Study.","authors":"Alireza Peyman, Mohammad Ghoreishi, Leila Babaei, Pegah Noorshargh, Ali Forouhari, Mohsen Pourazizi","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20241021-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To compare clinical outcomes of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (t-PRK) and conventional epithelium-off PRK (PRK) in patients with high compound myopic astigmatism.Methods: Sixty eyes of 30 myopic individuals with at least -2.50 diopters (D) of spherical equivalent and 3.00 D of cylindrical refractive error were enrolled in the study. Both eyes of each patient were randomly assigned to either the t-PRK method or epithelium-off PRK as a matched contralateral control group. Refractive outcomes were evaluated 6 months after surgery.Results: At the 6-month visit, cylindrical refractive error magnitude was lower in the t-PRK (0.51 ± 0.29 D) compared to the PRK (0.67 ± 0.30 D) group (P = .04). The residual astigmatism was 0.50 diopters or less in 23 eyes (76%) in the t-PRK group and 15 eyes (50%) in the PRK group. In vector analysis using the Alpins method, t-PRK resulted in a significantly higher percentage of success of astigmatic surgery (84.68 ± 8.95 in t-PRK versus 79.46 ± 10.88 in PRK, P = .04). Additionally, there was a marginal advantage for the t-PRK group regarding index of success of astigmatism surgery (P = .06) and absolute (P = .08) and arithmetic (P = .07) angles of error compared to the PRK group. Both groups had an equal safety profile.Conclusions: T-PRK is more accurate for astigmatic correction in high astigmatism than conventional PRK. Both t-PRK and PRK are comparable respecting safety and efficacy. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(12):e956-e965.].","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"40 12","pages":"e956-e965"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20241021-03","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare clinical outcomes of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (t-PRK) and conventional epithelium-off PRK (PRK) in patients with high compound myopic astigmatism.

Methods: Sixty eyes of 30 myopic individuals with at least -2.50 diopters (D) of spherical equivalent and 3.00 D of cylindrical refractive error were enrolled in the study. Both eyes of each patient were randomly assigned to either the t-PRK method or epithelium-off PRK as a matched contralateral control group. Refractive outcomes were evaluated 6 months after surgery.

Results: At the 6-month visit, cylindrical refractive error magnitude was lower in the t-PRK (0.51 ± 0.29 D) compared to the PRK (0.67 ± 0.30 D) group (P = .04). The residual astigmatism was 0.50 diopters or less in 23 eyes (76%) in the t-PRK group and 15 eyes (50%) in the PRK group. In vector analysis using the Alpins method, t-PRK resulted in a significantly higher percentage of success of astigmatic surgery (84.68 ± 8.95 in t-PRK versus 79.46 ± 10.88 in PRK, P = .04). Additionally, there was a marginal advantage for the t-PRK group regarding index of success of astigmatism surgery (P = .06) and absolute (P = .08) and arithmetic (P = .07) angles of error compared to the PRK group. Both groups had an equal safety profile.

Conclusions: T-PRK is more accurate for astigmatic correction in high astigmatism than conventional PRK. Both t-PRK and PRK are comparable respecting safety and efficacy. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(12):e956-e965.].

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

$Journal of refractive surgery$

Journal of refractive surgery 医学-外科

CiteScore

5.10

自引率

12.50%

发文量

160

审稿时长

4-8 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.