Costoclavicular block as a diaphragm-sparing nerve block for shoulder surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.4097/kja.24595
Youngin Lee, Seunguk Bang, Jihyun Chung, Min Suk Chae, Jungwon Shin
{"title":"Costoclavicular block as a diaphragm-sparing nerve block for shoulder surgery: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Youngin Lee, Seunguk Bang, Jihyun Chung, Min Suk Chae, Jungwon Shin","doi":"10.4097/kja.24595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distal nerve block approaches have been explored to reduce hemidiaphragmatic paresis (HDP) more effectively than interscalene block (ISB). However, these approaches are associated with a high incidence of HDP. The costoclavicular block (CCB) provides effective analgesia while reducing HDP. Here, we hypothesized that CCB would decrease the incidence of HDP compared to ISB while still providing effective pain relief after surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomly allocated to receive either ultrasound-guided CCB (n = 35) or ISB (n = 35). Each group received 0.2% ropivacaine (20 ml CCB, 10 ml ISB). The primary outcome was the incidence of HDP, as measured using M-mode ultrasound. Diaphragmatic excursion, pulmonary function test results, opioid consumption, and pain scores were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six patients were included. CCB group had a significantly lower incidence of HDP than those in the ISB group (5.9% vs. 84.4%, P < 0.001). The diaphragmatic excursion reduction was significantly more in the ISB (3.87 cm) group than in the CCB (0.25 cm) group (P < 0.001). The decrease in forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s from baseline was significantly greater in the ISB. There was no significant difference in opioid consumption between the two groups during the entire postoperative period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with ISB, CCB significantly reduced the incidence of HDP while maintaining effective analgesia and causing less pulmonary function impairment. CCB may be a viable option for diaphragmatic-sparing analgesia after shoulder surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"30-38"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.24595","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Distal nerve block approaches have been explored to reduce hemidiaphragmatic paresis (HDP) more effectively than interscalene block (ISB). However, these approaches are associated with a high incidence of HDP. The costoclavicular block (CCB) provides effective analgesia while reducing HDP. Here, we hypothesized that CCB would decrease the incidence of HDP compared to ISB while still providing effective pain relief after surgery.

Methods: Seventy patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomly allocated to receive either ultrasound-guided CCB (n = 35) or ISB (n = 35). Each group received 0.2% ropivacaine (20 ml CCB, 10 ml ISB). The primary outcome was the incidence of HDP, as measured using M-mode ultrasound. Diaphragmatic excursion, pulmonary function test results, opioid consumption, and pain scores were evaluated.

Results: Sixty-six patients were included. CCB group had a significantly lower incidence of HDP than those in the ISB group (5.9% vs. 84.4%, P < 0.001). The diaphragmatic excursion reduction was significantly more in the ISB (3.87 cm) group than in the CCB (0.25 cm) group (P < 0.001). The decrease in forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s from baseline was significantly greater in the ISB. There was no significant difference in opioid consumption between the two groups during the entire postoperative period.

Conclusions: Compared with ISB, CCB significantly reduced the incidence of HDP while maintaining effective analgesia and causing less pulmonary function impairment. CCB may be a viable option for diaphragmatic-sparing analgesia after shoulder surgery.

肩关节手术中肋锁骨阻滞作为膈保留神经阻滞:一项随机对照试验。
背景:对于肩部手术,远端神经阻滞入路比斜角肌间阻滞(ISB)更有效地减少半膈肌性轻瘫(HDP)。然而,这些方法仍然显示HDP的高发生率。最近,肋锁骨阻滞(CCB)作为一种有前景的技术出现,可以提供有效的镇痛,同时降低HDP。我们假设与ISB相比,CCB可以降低HDP的发生率,同时仍能有效缓解术后疼痛。方法:70例接受关节镜下肩袖修复术的患者随机分为超声引导下CCB (n=35)和ISB (n=35)两组。各组均给予0.2%罗哌卡因(CCB=20ml, ISB=10ml)。主要结局是通过m型超声测量HDP的发生率。评估膈肌漂移、肺功能、阿片类药物消耗和疼痛评分。结果:66例患者完成分析。CCB组HDP发生率明显低于ISB组(5.9% vs. 84.4%, P < 0.001)。ISB组膈肌偏移减少(3.84±2.24)明显高于CCB组(0.5±1.22)(P < 0.001)。与基线相比,ISB组FVC和FEV1的下降幅度更大。两组术后全期阿片类药物用量无显著差异。结论:与ISB相比,CCB可显著降低HDP的发生率,同时保持有效的镇痛作用,肺功能损害较小。CCB可以被认为是肩部手术后保留膈肌镇痛的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
84
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信